Literature DB >> 29408461

Impacts of simultaneous multislice acquisition on sensitivity and specificity in fMRI.

Benjamin B Risk1, Mary C Kociuba2, Daniel B Rowe3.   

Abstract

Simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging can be used to decrease the time between acquisition of fMRI volumes, which can increase sensitivity by facilitating the removal of higher-frequency artifacts and boosting effective sample size. The technique requires an additional processing step in which the slices are separated, or unaliased, to recover the whole brain volume. However, this may result in signal "leakage" between aliased locations, i.e., slice "leakage," and lead to spurious activation (decreased specificity). SMS can also lead to noise amplification, which can reduce the benefits of decreased repetition time. In this study, we evaluate the original slice-GRAPPA (no leak block) reconstruction algorithm and acceleration factor (AF = 8) used in the fMRI data in the young adult Human Connectome Project (HCP). We also evaluate split slice-GRAPPA (leak block), which can reduce slice leakage. We use simulations to disentangle higher test statistics into true positives (sensitivity) and false positives (decreased specificity). Slice leakage was greatly decreased by split slice-GRAPPA. Noise amplification was decreased by using moderate acceleration factors (AF = 4). We examined slice leakage in unprocessed fMRI motor task data from the HCP. When data were smoothed, we found evidence of slice leakage in some, but not all, subjects. We also found evidence of SMS noise amplification in unprocessed task and processed resting-state HCP data.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  False negatives; False positives; Multiband; Noise amplification; Parallel imaging; Slice leakage; Slice-GRAPPA

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29408461     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  12 in total

1.  Cerebello-basal Ganglia Networks and Cortical Network Global Efficiency.

Authors:  T Bryan Jackson; Jessica A Bernard
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Reliability and stability challenges in ABCD task fMRI data.

Authors:  James T Kennedy; Michael P Harms; Ozlem Korucuoglu; Serguei V Astafiev; Deanna M Barch; Wesley K Thompson; James M Bjork; Andrey P Anokhin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 7.400

3.  Comparison of multi-shot and single shot echo-planar diffusion tensor techniques for the optic pathway in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Chang Y Ho; Rachael Deardorff; Stephen F Kralik; John D West; Yu-Chien Wu; Chie-Schin Shih
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Towards HCP-Style macaque connectomes: 24-Channel 3T multi-array coil, MRI sequences and preprocessing.

Authors:  Joonas A Autio; Matthew F Glasser; Takayuki Ose; Chad J Donahue; Matteo Bastiani; Masahiro Ohno; Yoshihiko Kawabata; Yuta Urushibata; Katsutoshi Murata; Kantaro Nishigori; Masataka Yamaguchi; Yuki Hori; Atsushi Yoshida; Yasuhiro Go; Timothy S Coalson; Saad Jbabdi; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Henry Kennedy; Stephen Smith; David C Van Essen; Takuya Hayashi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Interactions between methodological and interindividual variability: How Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task contrast maps vary and impact associations with behavior.

Authors:  Michael I Demidenko; Alexander S Weigard; Karthikeyan Ganesan; Hyesue Jang; Andrew Jahn; Edward D Huntley; Daniel P Keating
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Multiband diffusion tensor imaging for presurgical mapping of motor and language pathways in patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Jenabi; Robert J Young; Raquel Moreno; Madeleine Gene; Nicholas Cho; Ricardo Otazo; Andrei I Holodny; Kyung K Peck
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Accurate modeling of temporal correlations in rapidly sampled fMRI time series.

Authors:  Nadège Corbin; Nick Todd; Karl J Friston; Martina F Callaghan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Cluster failure revisited: Impact of first level design and physiological noise on cluster false positive rates.

Authors:  Anders Eklund; Hans Knutsson; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Comparison of SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI at 7T in an fMRI localizer study with matched spatiotemporal resolution and homogenized excitation profiles.

Authors:  Caroline Le Ster; Antonio Moreno; Franck Mauconduit; Vincent Gras; Ruediger Stirnberg; Benedikt A Poser; Alexandre Vignaud; Evelyn Eger; Stanislas Dehaene; Florent Meyniel; Nicolas Boulant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Does higher sampling rate (multiband + SENSE) improve group statistics - An example from social neuroscience block design at 3T.

Authors:  Ritu Bhandari; Evgeniya Kirilina; Matthan Caan; Judith Suttrup; Teresa De Sanctis; Lorenzo De Angelis; Christian Keysers; Valeria Gazzola
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.