Literature DB >> 29408354

Increased Gradients After Aortic Valve Replacement With the Perceval Valve: The Role of Oversizing.

Alfredo Giuseppe Cerillo1, Francesca Amoretti2, Massimiliano Mariani3, Emanuele Cigala3, Michele Murzi4, Tommaso Gasbarri4, Marco Solinas4, Dante Chiappino2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Significant underexpansion or distortion of valved stents may be associated with altered leaflet function, leading to increased transprosthetic gradients and, possibly, early structural degeneration. We investigated the relationship between a computed tomography measure of the degree of oversizing and the early hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with the Perceval sutureless aortic valve (LivaNova, Saluggia, Italy).
METHODS: The degree of oversizing of the implanted prosthesis was calculated as the ratio between the patients' aortic annulus cross-sectional area and the ex vivo cross-sectional area of the implanted prosthesis in 151 Perceval patients who underwent preoperative cardiac computed tomography. This value was then entered in a multivariate analysis to ascertain its role as a predictor of increased postoperative gradient.
RESULTS: The operative mortality was 1.3%. Procedural success, defined as having a normally functioning valve in the proper anatomical location, was achieved in 150 patients (99.3%). The mean transprosthetic gradient was 13.4 ± 5.0 mm Hg, and 23 patients (15.2%) showed a gradient of 20 mm Hg or more at discharge or at the 1-month follow-up. The degree of oversizing of the implanted prosthesis was the most important predictor of increased postoperative gradient (odds ratio, 1.264; 95% confidence interval, 1.147 to 1.394; p < 0.0001). Interestingly, other relevant factors (patients' body surface area, prosthesis size) were not associated with increased gradients.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that excessive oversizing should be avoided in Perceval patients and suggests that a different sizing algorithm, possibly based on cardiac computed tomography, should be developed. Further studies are needed to optimize the sizing strategy for the Perceval sutureless valve.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29408354     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.12.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

1.  Right anterior mini-thoracotomy and sutureless valves: the perfect marriage.

Authors:  Marco Solinas; Giacomo Bianchi; Francesca Chiaramonti; Rafik Margaryan; Enkel Kallushi; Tommaso Gasbarri; Filippo Santarelli; Michele Murzi; Pierandrea Farneti; Alessandro Leone; Simone Simeoni; Egidio Varone; Federica Marchi; Mattia Glauber; Giovanni Concistrè
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-07

2.  Sutureless valve and rapid deployment valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Campbell D Flynn; Michael L Williams; Adam Chakos; Lucy Hirst; Benjamin Muston; David H Tian
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09

3.  Avoiding oversizing in sutureless valves leads to lower transvalvular gradients and less permanent pacemaker implants postoperatively.

Authors:  Delphine Szecel; Marie Lamberigts; Filip Rega; Peter Verbrugghe; Christophe Dubois; Bart Meuris
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

4.  Surgical technique modifies the postoperative atrioventricular block rate in sutureless prostheses.

Authors:  Miguel González Barbeito; Francisco Estévez-Cid; Patricia Pardo Martínez; Carlos Velasco García de Sierra; Carmen Iglesias Gil; Cristina Quiñones Laguillo; José Joaquín Cuenca Castillo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  A pooled analysis of pacemaker implantation after Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Marco Moscarelli; Giuseppe Santarpino; Thanos Athanasiou; Pasquale Mastroroberto; Khalil Fattouch; Giuseppe Nasso; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-04

6.  Direct comparison of rapid deployment versus sutureless aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suk Ho Sohn; Yoonjin Kang; Ji Seong Kim; Jae Woong Choi; Myoung-Jin Jang; Ho Young Hwang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  The importance of sizing in sutureless valves.

Authors:  Bart Meuris; Marie Lamberigts; Delphine Szecel
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 8.  Rapid deployment technology versus conventional sutured bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Mohammad Yousuf Salmasi; Sruthi Ramaraju; Iqraa Haq; Ryan A B Mohamed; Taimoor Khan; Faruk Oezalp; George Asimakopoulos; Shahzad G Raja
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 1.778

9.  Leaflet thickening and stent geometry in sutureless bioprosthetic aortic valves.

Authors:  Raquel Themudo; Mikael Kastengren; Elin Bacsovics Brolin; Kerstin Cederlund; Anders Svensson; Magnus Dalén
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Perceval or Trifecta to Prevent Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Carlota Vigil-Escalera; Yvan Persia; Carlos Morales; Isaac Pascual; Alberto Domínguez-Rodríguez; Emiliano Rodríguez-Caulo; Manuel Carnero; Rocío Díaz; Pablo Avanzas; Cesar Moris; Jacobo Silva
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.