Literature DB >> 29408353

Impact of Operative Time on Outcomes after Pancreatic Resection: A Risk-Adjusted Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database.

Laura Maggino1, Jason B Liu2, Brett L Ecker3, Henry A Pitt4, Charles M Vollmer5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Longer operative time (OT) has been associated with negative outcomes in various surgical procedures, but its role in pancreatic resection, a complex, high-acuity endeavor, is not yet well defined. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between OT and pancreatectomy outcomes in a risk-adjusted fashion. STUDY
DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) between 2014 and 2015 using the procedure-targeted pancreatectomy database of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP. Univariable analyses and multiple backward stepwise conditional logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of OT on postoperative occurrences.
RESULTS: Among 10,157 patients, 6,844 PDs and 3,313 DPs were performed. Median operative time was 358 minutes (interquartile range 282 to 444 minutes) for PD and 213 minutes (interquartile range 157 to 285 minutes) for DP. Male sex, younger age, obesity, neoadjuvant treatment, minimally invasive approaches, and vascular/concurrent organ resections were associated with longer OT for both procedures. Morbidity increased in a stepwise manner with increasing OT. After risk adjustment, increasing OT was negatively associated with overall morbidity, major complications, pancreatectomy-specific complications, infectious complications, and prolonged hospital stay. These associations were independent from patients' preoperative characteristics, operative approach, vascular or concurrent organ resection, and postoperative diagnosis. These findings held true for both PD and DP. Conversely, the association between OT and mortality was mainly driven by the excessive operative durations for PDs, and was not significant for DPs.
CONCLUSIONS: Longer OT is independently associated with worse perioperative outcomes after pancreatic resection, and should be considered a relevant parameter in risk-adjustment processes for outcomes evaluation. These findings suggest possible areas of quality improvement through individual and system-level initiatives.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29408353     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  12 in total

1.  Evolving the Paradigm of Early Drain Removal Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Thomas F Seykora; Laura Maggino; Giuseppe Malleo; Major K Lee; Robert Roses; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly and octogenarian patients: a single-center, comparative study.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Yi-Ping Mou; Jia-Fei Yan; Ren-Chao Zhang; Miao-Zun Zhang; Jia-Yu Zhou; Xian-Fa Wang; Hendi Maher; Qi-Long Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Dimitrios Xourafas; Timothy M Pawlik; Jordan M Cloyd
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Surgical challenges during open pancreaticoduodenectomy in a patient with situs inversus totalis: A rare case report and literature review.

Authors:  Sami Jomaa; Haya Deeb; Deema Alshaar; Fadi Obaied Alahmar
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-09-13

5.  The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Elie Chouillard; Mohamed Abu Hilal; Roland Croner; Brice Gayet; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.

Authors:  Jia-Fei Yan; Yu Pan; Ke Chen; He-Pan Zhu; Qi-Long Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Laparoscopic versus open pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma: separate propensity score matching analyses of distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Chao-Jie Huang; Qi-Long Chen; Ren-Chao Zhang; Miao-Zun Zhang; Guan-Yu Wang; Xian-Fa Wang; Yi-Ping Mou; Jia-Fei Yan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy: A technical illustration.

Authors:  Shankar I Logarajah; Terence Jackson; Muhammad Darwish; Kei Nagatomo; Edward Cho; Houssam Osman; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2021-12-08

9.  Preemptive Administration of Albumin during Pancreatectomy Does Not Reduce Postoperative Complications: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Heejoon Jeong; Jie Ae Kim; Mikyung Yang; Hyun Joo Ahn; JinSeok Heo; In Woong Han; Sang Hyun Shin; Nam Young Lee; Woo Jin Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Centralizing a national pancreatoduodenectomy service: striking the right balance.

Authors:  L S Nymo; D Kleive; K Waardal; E A Bringeland; J A Søreide; K J Labori; K E Mortensen; K Søreide; K Lassen
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.