Literature DB >> 29408238

Measuring appetitive conditioned responses in humans.

Margaret C Wardle1, Paula Lopez-Gamundi2, Shelly B Flagel3.   

Abstract

Clinical and preclinical findings suggest that individuals with abnormal responses to reward cues (stimuli associated with reward) may be at risk for maladaptive behaviors including obesity, addiction and depression. Our objective was to develop a new paradigm for producing appetitive conditioning using primary (food) rewards in humans, and investigate the equivalency of several outcomes previously used to measure appetitive responses to conditioned cues. We used an individualized food reward, and multimodal subjective, psychophysiological and behavioral measures of appetitive responses to a conditioned stimulus (CS) that predicted delivery of that food. We tested convergence among these measures of appetitive response, and relationships between these measures and action impulsivity, a putative correlate of appetitive conditioning. 90 healthy young adults participated. Although the paradigm produced robust appetitive conditioning in some measures, particularly psychophysiological ones, there were not strong correlations among measures of appetitive responses to the CS, as would be expected if they indexed a single underlying process. In addition, there was only one measure that related to impulsivity. These results provide important information for translational researchers interested in appetitive conditioning, suggesting that various measures of appetitive conditioning cannot be treated interchangeably.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appetitive conditioning, translational research; Human subjects; Psychophysiology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29408238      PMCID: PMC5845787          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  62 in total

Review 1.  I like it, but I'm not sure why: can evaluative conditioning occur without conscious awareness?

Authors:  A P Field
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2000-03

2.  The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: empirical evidence and theoretical implications.

Authors:  Peter F Lovibond; David R Shanks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2002-01

3.  Comparing apples and oranges: using reward-specific and reward-general subjective value representation in the brain.

Authors:  Dino J Levy; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Electrophysiology of appetitive taste and appetitive taste conditioning in humans.

Authors:  Ingmar H A Franken; Jorg Huijding; Ilse M T Nijs; Jan W van Strien
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 5.  Appetitive conditioning: neural bases and implications for psychopathology.

Authors:  C Martin-Soelch; J Linthicum; M Ernst
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 6.  Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Guillaume Sescousse; Xavier Caldú; Bàrbara Segura; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Attentional bias in emotional disorders.

Authors:  C MacLeod; A Mathews; P Tata
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1986-02

Review 8.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Effects of nucleus accumbens core and shell lesions on autoshaped lever-pressing.

Authors:  Stephen E Chang; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Individual differences in voluntary alcohol intake in rats: relationship with impulsivity, decision making and Pavlovian conditioned approach.

Authors:  Marcia Spoelder; Jacques P Flores Dourojeanni; Kathy C G de Git; Annemarie M Baars; Heidi M B Lesscher; Louk J M J Vanderschuren
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for incentive salience sensitization as a pathway to alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Roberto U Cofresí; Bruce D Bartholow; Thomas M Piasecki
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  Mapping sign-tracking and goal-tracking onto human behaviors.

Authors:  Janna M Colaizzi; Shelly B Flagel; Michelle A Joyner; Ashley N Gearhardt; Jennifer L Stewart; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Behavioral response bias and event-related brain potentials implicate elevated incentive salience attribution to alcohol cues in emerging adults with lower sensitivity to alcohol.

Authors:  Roberto U Cofresí; Casey B Kohen; Courtney A Motschman; Reinout W Wiers; Thomas M Piasecki; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Evidence for a shared representation of sequential cues that engage sign-tracking.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Smedley; Kyle S Smith
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.729

5.  Transfer of incentive salience from a first-order alcohol cue to a novel second-order alcohol cue among individuals at risk for alcohol use disorder: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Kimberly A Fleming; Roberto U Cofresí; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 7.256

6.  Opposing roles for amygdala and vmPFC in the return of appetitive conditioned responses in humans.

Authors:  Claudia Ebrahimi; Stefan P Koch; Charlotte Pietrock; Thomas Fydrich; Andreas Heinz; Florian Schlagenhauf
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Skin Conductance Responses Indicate Children are Physiologically Aroused by Their Favourite Branded Food and Drink Products.

Authors:  Rachel Smith; Bridget Kelly; Heather Yeatman; Stuart Johnstone; Louise Baur; Lesley King; Emma Boyland; Kathy Chapman; Clare Hughes; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.