| Literature DB >> 29407723 |
Justin Newton Scanlan1, Nicola Hancock2, Anne Honey3.
Abstract
There is a need for robust outcome measures for use in psychiatric services. Particularly lacking are self-rated recovery measures with evidence of sensitivity to change. This study was established to examine the convergent validity and sensitivity to change over time (responsiveness) of the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS), in comparison to level of unmet need as measured by the Camberwell Assessment of Need - Short Appraisal Scale (CANSAS). Convergent validity was examined through cross-sectional correlations between 540 CANSAS and RAS-DS scores collected on the same day for the same individuals. Sensitivity to change was examined using correlations between change scores in CANSAS and RAS-DS where both were collected on the same day and the two time points were separated by 90 days or more (n = 498). Results demonstrated moderate, significant cross-sectional correlations between CANSAS scores and RAS-DS total and domain scores and between change scores of both instruments. Results suggest that the RAS-DS is sensitive enough to detect change over time. Only moderate correlation between the RAS-DS and CANSAS suggests that, in the context of recovery-oriented service provision, it is important to measure self-reported recovery in addition to level of unmet needs.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptation, Psychological; Needs assessment; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Self report; Social adjustment
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29407723 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychiatry Res ISSN: 0165-1781 Impact factor: 3.222