Literature DB >> 29407723

The Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Sensitivity to change over time and convergent validity with level of unmet need.

Justin Newton Scanlan1, Nicola Hancock2, Anne Honey3.   

Abstract

There is a need for robust outcome measures for use in psychiatric services. Particularly lacking are self-rated recovery measures with evidence of sensitivity to change. This study was established to examine the convergent validity and sensitivity to change over time (responsiveness) of the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS), in comparison to level of unmet need as measured by the Camberwell Assessment of Need - Short Appraisal Scale (CANSAS). Convergent validity was examined through cross-sectional correlations between 540 CANSAS and RAS-DS scores collected on the same day for the same individuals. Sensitivity to change was examined using correlations between change scores in CANSAS and RAS-DS where both were collected on the same day and the two time points were separated by 90 days or more (n = 498). Results demonstrated moderate, significant cross-sectional correlations between CANSAS scores and RAS-DS total and domain scores and between change scores of both instruments. Results suggest that the RAS-DS is sensitive enough to detect change over time. Only moderate correlation between the RAS-DS and CANSAS suggests that, in the context of recovery-oriented service provision, it is important to measure self-reported recovery in addition to level of unmet needs.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation, Psychological; Needs assessment; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Self report; Social adjustment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29407723     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  3 in total

1.  The Pathways to Participation (P2P) Program: A Pilot Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Danielle Hitch; Lindsay Vernon; Rachel Collins; Carolyn Dun; Sarah Palexas; Kate Lhuede
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  A mixed methods evaluation of an integrated adult mental health service model.

Authors:  Diana Beere; Imogen S Page; Sandra Diminic; Meredith Harris
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Demonstrating the processes and outcomes of a rural Community Mental Health Rehabilitation Service: A realist evaluation.

Authors:  A Leet; S Dennis; J Muller; S Walsh; H Bowen-Salter; J Kernot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.