Claire Adams Spears1, Dina M Jones2, Scott R Weaver3, Terry F Pechacek4, Michael P Eriksen5. 1. Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States; Division of Health Promotion and Behavior, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: cspears@gsu.edu. 2. Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: djones153@student.gsu.edu. 3. Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: srweaver@gsu.edu. 4. Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States; Division of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: tpechacek@gsu.edu. 5. Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States; Division of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: meriksen@gsu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Smoking rates are disproportionately high among adults with mental health conditions (MHC), and recent research suggests that among former smokers, those with MHC are more likely to use electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). This study investigated reasons for ENDS use and related risk perceptions among individuals with versus without MHC. METHODS: Among adult current ENDS users (n=550), associations between self-reported MHC diagnoses and motives for ENDS use and ENDS risk perceptions were examined, stratified by smoking status. RESULTS: There were no significant associations between MHC status and ENDS motives or perceptions in the overall sample. However, current smokers with MHC indicated thinking more about how ENDS might improve their health, and former smokers with MHC reported thinking less about how ENDS might harm their health, compared to their counterparts without MHC. Former smokers with MHC rated several reasons for ENDS use (e.g., less harmful than regular cigarettes; to quit smoking; appealing flavors) as more important than did those without MHC. CONCLUSIONS: Current and former smokers with MHC may be especially optimistic about health benefits of ENDS. However, they might also be prone to health risks of continued ENDS use or concurrent use with traditional cigarettes. It will be important for public health messaging to provide this population with accurate information about benefits and risks of ENDS.
BACKGROUND: Smoking rates are disproportionately high among adults with mental health conditions (MHC), and recent research suggests that among former smokers, those with MHC are more likely to use electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). This study investigated reasons for ENDS use and related risk perceptions among individuals with versus without MHC. METHODS: Among adult current ENDS users (n=550), associations between self-reported MHC diagnoses and motives for ENDS use and ENDS risk perceptions were examined, stratified by smoking status. RESULTS: There were no significant associations between MHC status and ENDS motives or perceptions in the overall sample. However, current smokers with MHC indicated thinking more about how ENDS might improve their health, and former smokers with MHC reported thinking less about how ENDS might harm their health, compared to their counterparts without MHC. Former smokers with MHC rated several reasons for ENDS use (e.g., less harmful than regular cigarettes; to quit smoking; appealing flavors) as more important than did those without MHC. CONCLUSIONS: Current and former smokers with MHC may be especially optimistic about health benefits of ENDS. However, they might also be prone to health risks of continued ENDS use or concurrent use with traditional cigarettes. It will be important for public health messaging to provide this population with accurate information about benefits and risks of ENDS.
Authors: Laura A Gibson; MeLisa R Creamer; Alison B Breland; Aida Luz Giachello; Annette Kaufman; Grace Kong; Terry F Pechacek; Jessica K Pepper; Eric K Soule; Bonnie Halpern-Felsher Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Terry F Pechacek; Pratibha Nayak; Kyle R Gregory; Scott R Weaver; Michael P Eriksen Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Claire Adams Spears; Dina M Jones; Scott R Weaver; Bo Yang; Terry F Pechacek; Michael P Eriksen Journal: Addiction Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Andrea H Weinberger; Jiaqi Zhu; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Katarzyna Wyka; Renee D Goodwin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Mehrak Javadi-Paydar; Tony M Kerr; Eric L Harvey; Maury Cole; Michael A Taffe Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Claire Adams Spears; Dina M Jones; Scott R Weaver; Bo Yang; Terry F Pechacek; Michael P Eriksen Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Alyssa F Harlow; Jessica L Fetterman; Craig S Ross; Rose Marie Robertson; Aruni Bhatnagar; Emelia J Benjamin; Andrew C Stokes Journal: Tob Control Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 6.953