Literature DB >> 29175027

Measuring perceptions related to e-cigarettes: Important principles and next steps to enhance study validity.

Laura A Gibson1, MeLisa R Creamer2, Alison B Breland3, Aida Luz Giachello4, Annette Kaufman5, Grace Kong6, Terry F Pechacek7, Jessica K Pepper8, Eric K Soule3, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher9.   

Abstract

Measuring perceptions associated with e-cigarette use can provide valuable information to help explain why youth and adults initiate and continue to use e-cigarettes. However, given the complexity of e-cigarette devices and their continuing evolution, measures of perceptions of this product have varied greatly. Our goal, as members of the working group on e-cigarette measurement within the Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science (TCORS) network, is to provide guidance to researchers developing surveys concerning e-cigarette perceptions. We surveyed the 14 TCORS sites and received and reviewed 371 e-cigarette perception items from seven sites. We categorized the items based on types of perceptions asked, and identified measurement approaches that could enhance data validity and approaches that researchers may consider avoiding. The committee provides suggestions in four areas: (1) perceptions of benefits, (2) harm perceptions, (3) addiction perceptions, and (4) perceptions of social norms. Across these 4 areas, the most appropriate way to assess e-cigarette perceptions depends largely on study aims. The type and number of items used to examine e-cigarette perceptions will also vary depending on respondents' e-cigarette experience (i.e., user vs. non-user), level of experience (e.g., experimental vs. established), type of e-cigarette device (e.g., cig-a-like, mod), and age. Continuous formative work is critical to adequately capture perceptions in response to the rapidly changing e-cigarette landscape. Most important, it is imperative to consider the unique perceptual aspects of e-cigarettes, building on the conventional cigarette literature as appropriate, but not relying on existing conventional cigarette perception items without adjustment.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beliefs; E-cigarette; Electronic cigarette; Measurement; Perceptions; Vaping

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29175027      PMCID: PMC5807230          DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  55 in total

1.  Perceptions of the relative harm of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among U.S. youth.

Authors:  Bridget K Ambrose; Brian L Rostron; Sarah E Johnson; David B Portnoy; Benjamin J Apelberg; Annette R Kaufman; Conrad J Choiniere
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Comparison of Direct and Indirect Measures of E-cigarette Risk Perceptions.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Michelle T Bover Manderski; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-01-01

3.  Correlates of unrealistic risk beliefs in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; William M P Klein; Richard P Moser; Mandi Yu; William R Waldron; Timothy S McNeel; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-11-26

Review 4.  Association Between Initial Use of e-Cigarettes and Subsequent Cigarette Smoking Among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samir Soneji; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Thomas A Wills; Adam M Leventhal; Jennifer B Unger; Laura A Gibson; JaeWon Yang; Brian A Primack; Judy A Andrews; Richard A Miech; Tory R Spindle; Danielle M Dick; Thomas Eissenberg; Robert C Hornik; Rui Dang; James D Sargent
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 5.  Nicotine and the Developing Human: A Neglected Element in the Electronic Cigarette Debate.

Authors:  Lucinda J England; Rebecca E Bunnell; Terry F Pechacek; Van T Tong; Tim A McAfee
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 6.  Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  E-cigarettes and cardiovascular risk: beyond science and mysticism.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Emmanuel J Favaloro; Tiziana Meschi; Camilla Mattiuzzi; Loris Borghi; Gianfranco Cervellin
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 4.180

8.  Perceived risk and quitting behaviors: results from the ITC 4-country survey.

Authors:  Mary Jean Costello; Christine Logel; Geoffrey T Fong; Mark P Zanna; Paul W McDonald
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2012-09

9.  Flavored e-cigarette use: Characterizing youth, young adult, and adult users.

Authors:  M B Harrell; S R Weaver; A Loukas; M Creamer; C N Marti; C D Jackson; J W Heath; P Nayak; C L Perry; T F Pechacek; M P Eriksen
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-11-11

10.  The Potential That Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Can be a Disruptive Technology: Results From a National Survey.

Authors:  Terry F Pechacek; Pratibha Nayak; Kyle R Gregory; Scott R Weaver; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  27 in total

1.  Motives and perceptions regarding electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among adults with mental health conditions.

Authors:  Claire Adams Spears; Dina M Jones; Scott R Weaver; Terry F Pechacek; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Measuring E-cigarette use, dependence, and perceptions: Important principles and considerations to advance tobacco regulatory science.

Authors:  Bonnie Halpern-Felsher; Hyoshin Kim
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  E-Cigarette Outcome Expectancies among Nationally Representative Samples of Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Joshua O Barker; Dannielle E Kelley; Seth M Noar; Beth A Reboussin; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.164

4.  Effects of Social Media on Adolescents' Willingness and Intention to Use E-Cigarettes: An Experimental Investigation.

Authors:  Erin A Vogel; Danielle E Ramo; Mark L Rubinstein; Kevin L Delucchi; Sabrina M Darrow; Caitlin Costello; Judith J Prochaska
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  A Middle School Program to Prevent E-Cigarette Use: A Pilot Study of "CATCH My Breath".

Authors:  Steven H Kelder; Dale S Mantey; Duncan Van Dusen; Kathleen Case; Alexandra Haas; Andrew E Springer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Longitudinal Analysis of Associations Between Reasons for Electronic Cigarette Use and Change in Smoking Status Among Adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.

Authors:  Eric K Soule; Andrew D Plunk; Paul T Harrell; Rashelle B Hayes; Kathryn C Edwards
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Measuring characteristics of e-cigarette consumption among college students.

Authors:  Su-Wei Wong; Hsien-Chang Lin; Megan E Piper; Adam Siddiqui; Anne Buu
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2018-10-05

8.  Cigarette and e-cigarette use and social perceptions over the transition to college: The role of ADHD symptoms.

Authors:  Melissa R Dvorsky; Joshua M Langberg
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2019-03-14

9.  Integrating Tobacco Prevention Skills into an Evidence-Based Intervention for Adolescents with ADHD: Results from a Pilot Efficacy Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rosalie Corona; Melissa R Dvorsky; Stephanie Romo; Amanda M Parks; Elizaveta Bourchtein; Zoe R Smith; Melissa Avila; Joshua Langberg
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2020-11

10.  Pharmacy Students' Perceptions of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems as Compared to Those of Other Health Care Students.

Authors:  Michelle Sahr; Shelby Kelsh; Anne Ottney; Mark Young; Rodney Larson; Minji Sohn
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.