Literature DB >> 29406851

Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography for Management of Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Mohamed-Salah Annabi1, Eden Touboul1, Abdellaziz Dahou1, Ian G Burwash2, Jutta Bergler-Klein3, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano4, Stefan Orwat5, Helmut Baumgartner5, Julia Mascherbauer3, Gerald Mundigler3, João L Cavalcante6, Éric Larose1, Philippe Pibarot1, Marie-Annick Clavel7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, patients are considered to have true-severe stenosis when the mean gradient (MG) is ≥40 mm Hg with an aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm2 during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). However, these criteria have not been previously validated.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the value of these criteria to predict the presence of true-severe AS and the occurrence of death in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LF-LG AS).
METHODS: One hundred eighty-six patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) LF-LG AS were prospectively recruited and underwent DSE, with measurement of the MG, AVA, and the projected AVA (AVAProj), which is an estimate of the AVA at a standardized normal flow rate. Severity of AS was independently corroborated by macroscopic evaluation of the valve at the time of valve replacement in 54 patients, by measurement of the aortic valve calcium by computed tomography in 25 patients, and by both methods in 8 patients. According to these assessments, 50 of 87 (57%) patients in the study cohort had true-severe stenosis.
RESULTS: Peak stress MG ≥40 mm Hg, peak stress AVA ≤1 cm2, and the combination of peak stress MG ≥40 mm Hg and peak stress AVA ≤1 cm2 correctly classified AS severity in 48%, 60%, and 47% of patients, respectively, whereas AVAProj ≤1 cm2 was better than all the previous markers (p < 0.007), with 70% correct classification. Among the subset of 88 patients managed conservatively (47% of the cohort), 52 died during a follow-up of 2.8 ± 2.5 years. After adjustment for age, sex, functional capacity, chronic kidney failure, and peak stress LVEF, peak stress MG and AVA were not predictors of mortality in this subset. In contrast, AVAProj ≤1 cm2 was a strong predictor of mortality under medical management (hazard ratio: 3.65; p = 0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with low LVEF LF-LG AS, the DSE criteria of a peak stress MG ≥40 mm Hg, or the composite of a peak stress MG ≥40 mm Hg and a peak stress AVA ≤1 cm2 proposed in the guidelines to identify true-severe AS and recommend valve replacement, have limited value to predict actual stenosis severity and outcomes. In contrast, AVAProj better distinguishes true-severe AS from pseudo-severe AS and is strongly associated with mortality in patients under conservative management. (Multicenter Prospective Study of Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis [TOPAS]; NCT01835028).
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LV dysfunction; aortic stenosis; stress echocardiography; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29406851     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  19 in total

1.  The role of dobutamine stress echocardiography based projected aortic valve area in assessing patients with classical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Mohinder R Vindhyal; Paul M Ndunda; Zaher Fanari
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

Review 2.  Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Contemporary Evaluation and Management.

Authors:  Mohamed Salah Abdelghani; Sundus Sardar; Abdelhaleem Shawky Hamada
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 3.  Severe low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of inadequate left ventricular responses to high afterload on diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making.

Authors:  Michael Dandel; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  The contemporary role of echocardiography in the assessment and management of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Takeshi Kitai; Rayji S Tsutsui
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Management of aortic stenosis: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.

Authors:  Mohammed Y Khanji; Fabrizio Ricci; Victor Galusko; Baskar Sekar; C Anwar A Chahal; Laura Ceriello; Sabina Gallina; Simon Kennon; Wael I Awad; Adrian Ionescu
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2021-07-21

6.  Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Flow Reserve Does Not Matter Anymore.

Authors:  Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 7.  The Role of Imaging in Measuring Disease Progression and Assessing Novel Therapies in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mhairi K Doris; Russell J Everett; Matthew Shun-Shin; Marie-Annick Clavel; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-01

8.  Serum Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Remodelling Reflect Extra-Valvular Cardiac Damage in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Laura Bäz; Gudrun Dannberg; Katja Grün; Julian Westphal; Sven Möbius-Winkler; Christian Jung; Alexander Pfeil; P Christian Schulze; Marcus Franz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Value of low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography on defining true severe low gradient aortic stenosis in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Kai Hu; Eva Liebner; Frank Weidemann; Sebastian Herrmann; Georg Ertl; Stefan Frantz; Peter Nordbeck
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Moderate Aortic Stenosis: What is it and When Should We Intervene?

Authors:  Sveeta Badiani; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; Nikoo Aziminia; Thomas A Treibel; Guy Lloyd
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.