Literature DB >> 33751049

Management of aortic stenosis: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.

Mohammed Y Khanji1,2,3, Fabrizio Ricci4,5,6, Victor Galusko7, Baskar Sekar8, C Anwar A Chahal2,9,10, Laura Ceriello4, Sabina Gallina4, Simon Kennon2, Wael I Awad2, Adrian Ionescu8.   

Abstract

Multiple guidelines exist for the management of aortic stenosis (AS). We systematically reviewed current guidelines and recommendations, developed by national or international medical organizations, on management of AS to aid clinical decision-making. Publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE between 1 June 2010 and 15 January 2021 were identified. Additionally, the International Guideline Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Library for Health Guidelines Finder, Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase, and websites of relevant organizations were searched. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Two reviewers assessed rigour of guideline development and extracted the recommendations. Of the seven guidelines and recommendations retrieved, five showed considerable rigour of development. Those rigourously developed, agreed on the definition of severe AS and diverse haemodynamic phenotypes, indications and contraindications for intervention in symptomatic severe AS, surveillance intervals in asymptomatic severe AS, and the importance of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) and shared decision-making. Discrepancies exist in age and surgical risk cut-offs for recommending surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) vs. transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the use of biomarkers and complementary multimodality imaging for decision-making in asymptomatic patients and surveillance intervals for non-severe AS. Contemporary guidelines for AS management agree on the importance of MDT involvement and shared decision-making for individualized treatment and unanimously indicate valve replacement in severe, symptomatic AS. Discrepancies exist in thresholds for age and procedural risk used in choosing between SAVR and TAVI, role of biomarkers and complementary imaging modalities to define AS severity and risk of progression in asymptomatic patients. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Guidelines recommendations; TAVI; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33751049      PMCID: PMC8294692          DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes        ISSN: 2058-1742


  56 in total

1.  Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Michael J Mack; Martin B Leon; Vinod H Thourani; Raj Makkar; Susheel K Kodali; Mark Russo; Samir R Kapadia; S Chris Malaisrie; David J Cohen; Philippe Pibarot; Jonathon Leipsic; Rebecca T Hahn; Philipp Blanke; Mathew R Williams; James M McCabe; David L Brown; Vasilis Babaliaros; Scott Goldman; Wilson Y Szeto; Philippe Genereux; Ashish Pershad; Stuart J Pocock; Maria C Alu; John G Webb; Craig R Smith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/EACTS/HVS/SCA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for the Treatment of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Heart Valve Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Robert O Bonow; Alan S Brown; Linda D Gillam; Samir R Kapadia; Clifford J Kavinsky; Brian R Lindman; Michael J Mack; Vinod H Thourani
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Patient screening for early detection of aortic stenosis (AS)-review of current practice and future perspectives.

Authors:  Martin Thoenes; Peter Bramlage; Pepe Zamorano; David Messika-Zeitoun; Daniel Wendt; Markus Kasel; Jana Kurucova; Richard P Steeds
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement.

Authors:  John Webb; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Stephen Fremes; Philippe Pibarot; Marc Ruel; Reda Ibrahim; Robert Welsh; Christopher Feindel; Samuel Lichtenstein
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Echocardiographic surveillance of aortic valve stenosis: towards a standardized approach.

Authors:  Abbas Zaidi; Adrian Ionescu; Rajan Sharma; Martyn Heatley
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2012-11

6.  Survival by stroke volume index in patients with low-gradient normal EF severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Mackram F Eleid; Paul Sorajja; Hector I Michelena; Joseph F Malouf; Christopher G Scott; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Cost-utility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis treated by medical management: a UK cost-utility analysis based on patient-level data from the ADVANCE study.

Authors:  Stephen Brecker; Stuart Mealing; Amie Padhiar; James Eaton; Mark Sculpher; Rachele Busca; Johan Bosmans; Ulrich J Gerckens; Peter Wenaweser; Corrado Tamburino; Sabine Bleiziffer; Nicolo Piazza; Neil Moat; Axel Linke
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2014-10-23

8.  Effects of Aortic Valve Replacement on Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Systolic Function: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qishi Zheng; Andie H Djohan; Enghow Lim; Zee Pin Ding; Lieng H Ling; Luming Shi; Edwin Shih-Yen Chan; Calvin Woon Loong Chin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The Role of Imaging in Measuring Disease Progression and Assessing Novel Therapies in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mhairi K Doris; Russell J Everett; Matthew Shun-Shin; Marie-Annick Clavel; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-01

Review 10.  Special Article - The role of hand-held ultrasound for cardiopulmonary assessment during a pandemic.

Authors:  Mohammed Y Khanji; Fabrizio Ricci; Riyaz S Patel; Anwar A Chahal; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; Victor Galusko; Jagat Narula; Adrian Ionescu
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 8.194

View more
  3 in total

1.  Aliased Flow Signal Planimetry by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Grading Aortic Stenosis Severity: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Cesare Mantini; Mohammed Y Khanji; Emilia D'Ugo; Marzia Olivieri; Cristiano Giovanni Caputi; Gabriella Bufano; Domenico Mastrodicasa; Darien Calvo Garcia; Domenico Rotondo; Matteo Candeloro; Claudio Tana; Filippo Cademartiri; Adrian Ionescu; Massimo Caulo; Sabina Gallina; Fabrizio Ricci
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-10-18

2.  Prognostic Value of Global Longitudinal Strain in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Minghui Zhang; Hui Chen; Hongwei Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 3.  Futility in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Search for Clarity.

Authors:  Kush P Patel; Thomas A Treibel; Paul R Scully; Michael Fertleman; Samuel Searle; Daniel Davis; James C Moon; Michael J Mullen
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.