Yara M Asi1, Lynn Unruh2, Xinliang Liu2. 1. Department of Health Management and Informatics, College of Health and Public Affairs, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. Yara.Asi@ucf.edu. 2. Department of Health Management and Informatics, College of Health and Public Affairs, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A significant body of research indicates that the conflict environment is detrimental to the quality of life and well-being of civilians. This study assesses the health-related quality of life, stress, and insecurity of the West Bank, which has been engaged in conflict for seven decades, in comparison to a demographically and culturally similar population in Jordan, a neighboring nation with no conflict. We expect the Jordanian sample to report better functioning. METHODS: We collected 793 surveys from university students (mean age = 20.2) in Nablus, West Bank (398 [50.2%]) and Irbid, Jordan (395 [49.8%]). The survey instrument consisted of the SF-36 to measure HRQoL, the PSS-4 to measure stress, and an insecurity scale, along with demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that outcomes in the West Bank were not significantly worse than in Jordan, and in some cases represented better functioning, especially in the SF-36 measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our counterintuitive results suggest that health and well-being outcomes are dependent on many factors in addition to conflict. For one, it may be that the better perceived health and well-being of the Palestinians is because they have developed a culture of resilience. Additionally, Jordanians are undergoing a period of instability due to internal struggles and surrounding conflicts.
PURPOSE: A significant body of research indicates that the conflict environment is detrimental to the quality of life and well-being of civilians. This study assesses the health-related quality of life, stress, and insecurity of the West Bank, which has been engaged in conflict for seven decades, in comparison to a demographically and culturally similar population in Jordan, a neighboring nation with no conflict. We expect the Jordanian sample to report better functioning. METHODS: We collected 793 surveys from university students (mean age = 20.2) in Nablus, West Bank (398 [50.2%]) and Irbid, Jordan (395 [49.8%]). The survey instrument consisted of the SF-36 to measure HRQoL, the PSS-4 to measure stress, and an insecurity scale, along with demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that outcomes in the West Bank were not significantly worse than in Jordan, and in some cases represented better functioning, especially in the SF-36 measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our counterintuitive results suggest that health and well-being outcomes are dependent on many factors in addition to conflict. For one, it may be that the better perceived health and well-being of the Palestinians is because they have developed a culture of resilience. Additionally, Jordanians are undergoing a period of instability due to internal struggles and surrounding conflicts.
Entities:
Keywords:
Conflict; Health-related quality of life; Insecurity; Jordan; Stress; West Bank
Authors: Niveen M E Abu-Rmeileh; Weeam Hammoudeh; Awad Mataria; Abdullatif Husseini; Marwan Khawaja; Harry S Shannon; Dennis Hogan; Graham C M Watt; Huda Zurayk; Rita Giacaman Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Sa'ed H Zyoud; Samah W Al-Jabi; Waleed M Sweileh; Aysha H Wildali; Hanan M Saleem; Hayat A Aysa; Mohammad A Badwan; Rahmat Awang; Donald E Morisky Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Samah W Al-Jabi; Sa'ed H Zyoud; Waleed M Sweileh; Aysha H Wildali; Hanan M Saleem; Hayat A Aysa; Mohammad A Badwan; Rahmat Awang Journal: Health Expect Date: 2014-12-07 Impact factor: 3.377