Literature DB >> 29403707

An ionic liquid supported CeO2 nanoparticles-carbon nanotubes composite-enhanced electrochemical DNA-based sensor for the detection of Pb2.

Yan Li1, Xiao-Rong Liu1, Xiao-Hui Ning1, Can-Can Huang1, Jian-Bin Zheng1, Jun-Cai Zhang1,2.   

Abstract

An electrochemical sensor incorporating a signal enhancement for the determination of lead (II) ions (Pb2+) was designed on the basis of the thrombin-binding aptamer (TBA) as a molecular recognition element and ionic liquid supported cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles-carbon nanotubes composite modification. The composite comprises nanoparticles CeO2, multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) and hydrophobic room temperature ionic liquid (RTIL) 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMIMBF4). The electrochemical sensors were fabricated by immersing the CeO2-MWNTs-EMIMBF4 modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) into the solution of TBA probe. In the presence of Pb2+, the TBA probe could form stable G-quartet structure by the specific binding interactions between Pb2+ and TBA. The TBA-bound Pb2+ can be electrochemically reduced, which provides a readout signal for quantitative detection of Pb2+. The reduction peak current is linearly related to the concentration of Pb2+ from 1.0×10-8 M to 1.0×10-5 M with a detection limit of 5×10-9 M. This work demonstrates that the CeO2-MWNTs-EMIMBF4 nanocomposite modified GCE provides a promising platform for immobilizing the TBA probe and enhancing the sensitivity of the DNA-based sensors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CeO2 nanoparticle; DNA-based sensor; Electrochemical; Ionic liquid; Lead (II) ion; Multi-wall carbon nanotubes

Year:  2011        PMID: 29403707      PMCID: PMC5760794          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2011.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Anal        ISSN: 2214-0883


Introduction

Detection and quantification of metal ions and organic molecules found in biological systems and in the environment remains an active area of research, as these molecules are either quite beneficial or toxic to human health. Lead is one of the most toxic metallic pollutants, for example, lead can cause renal malfunction and inhibit brain development [1], [2], [3]. Although conventional detection methods, including atomic absorption spectrometry [4], inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-mass spectrometry [5], anodic stripping voltammetry [6], and atomic fluorescence spectrometry [7], provide high sensitivity, they are not suitable for on-site detection because of their sophisticated equipments and sample treatments. In recent years, much optical and electrochemical techniques have been developed for the selective detection of Pb2+ based on small molecules [8], DNAzymes [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], oligonucleotides [14], polymers [15], and functional nanoparticles [16]. For example, Li and Lu [9] and Liu and Lu [10] developed a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based DNAzyme system for Pb2+ sensing. The sensor was made of FRET between fluorophore and quencher labeled on the DNAzyme (17E) and its substrate, respectively. In the presence of Pb2+, the 17E catalyzes hydrolytic cleavage of substrate and it turned on the fluorescence for sensing. Xiao et al. [11] developed an electrochemical DNAzyme-based Pb2+ biosensor fabricated by thiol-assembling a methylene blue-tagged thiol containing DNAzyme with a detection limit of 0.3 μM. However, many of these systems have limited practical use because of, for example, poor aqueous solubility, cross-sensitivity toward other metal ions, matrix interference, high cost (e.g., enzymes), complicated processing, the use of unstable molecules (e.g., RNA), or poor sensitivity [14]. Recently, Liu et al. [14] reported a technique for the highly selective and sensitive detection of Pb2+ using a thrombin-binding aptamer (TBA) probe labeled with the donor carboxyfluorescein and the quencher 4-([4-(dimethylamino) phenyl] azo) benzoic acid at its 5′ and 3′ termini. Owing to the high sensitivity, inherent simplicity, low cost, and excellent compatibility to miniaturization technology for electrochemical techniques, the development of electrochemical sensors for Pb2+ on the basis of TBA as a molecular recognition might hold great potential for decentralized studies and on-site monitoring. Room temperature ionic liquid (RTIL), composed of organic cations and various anions, represents a kind of novel nonaqueous but polar solvent [17]. It exhibits many unique advantages such as high chemical and thermal stabilities, negligible vapor pressure, high ionic conductivity, wide electrochemical windows, low toxicity, and ability to dissolve a wide range of organic and inorganic compounds [18]. The attractive properties of RTIL make them promising candidates for electrochemical DNA-based sensor [19], [20], [21]. Increasing attention has been paid to the modified electrodes with ionic liquid and nanomaterial composite in hopes of combining their unique properties. In recent years, that inorganic oxide nanoparticles are utilized to be the immobilizing carriers of ssDNA probe is becoming the focus of research due to unique properties derived from their low dimensionality and possible quantum-confinement effects [22], [23], [24]. Among the inorganic oxide nanoparticles, cerium oxide (CeO2) has been exploited as a promising material for biosensing owing to its unusual properties including large surface area, excellent biocompatibility, nontoxicity, high chemical stability, and strong adsorption ability (high isoelectric point ∼9.2) [25], [26]. It may be noted that positively charged surface of CeO2 nanoparticles could be utilized for binding of negatively charged biomolecules. Recently, a novel nanocomposite membrane, comprising nanosized shuttle-shaped CeO2, single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and hydrophobic RTIL, was developed on the glassy carbon electrode for electrochemical sensing of the immobilization and hybridization of DNA [27]. However, to our best knowledge, the application of ionic liquid supported CeO2 nanoparticles–multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) composite for the determination of Pb2+ has not been reported on the basis of the TBA as a molecular recognition element. The aim of this work was to improve the sensitivity of electrochemical DNA-based sensor for the detection of Pb2+ utilizing TBA as a molecular recognition element and ionic liquid supported CeO2 nanoparticles–MWNTs composite modified gold electrode. The schematic diagram of the electrochemical DNA-based sensor for the detection of Pb2+ ion is shown in Fig. 1. In this paper, an electrochemical sensor for the determination of Pb2+ was designed and the electrochemical characteristics of the electrochemical sensor fabricated were investigated. To our best knowledge, it is new example of electrochemical sensor for the determination of Pb2+ based on signal enhancement.
Figure 1

Schematic description of the electrochemical DNA-based sensor for the detection of Pb2+ ion.

Schematic description of the electrochemical DNA-based sensor for the detection of Pb2+ ion.

Experimental

Reagents and apparatus

MWNTs were obtained from Shenzhen Nanotech Port Co. Ltd. (Shenzhen, China). CeO2 nanoparticle was obtained from Beijing Nachen Science and Technology Ltd. Company (Beijing, China). 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMIMBF4) was obtained from Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Pb2+ stock solution was prepared by dissolving Pb(NO3)2 with Millipore Milli-Q water. Thrombin-binding aptamers were synthesized by Shenggong Bioengineering Ltd. Company (Shanghai, China). A 21-mer target aptamer probe adopted from literature [28] was used to bind with thrombin: 5′-CAC TGT GGT TGG TGT GGT TGG-(CH2)6-NH2-3′. MgCl2, CaCl2, Hg (NO3)2, CuCl2, ZnCl2, and all other reagents were of analytical grade. A 0.10 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH 7.40, 0.10 M NaCl+10 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4) was used as hybridization buffer, washing solution and electrolyte. All reagents were of analytical grade. Millipore Milli-Q water (18 MΩ cm) was used throughout. The experimental set-up for electrochemical measurement was the same as the previous paper [29].

Preparation of the CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE

The purified MWCNTs were prepared as reported in the literature [29], [30], [31]. 10 mg of purified MWNTs were dispersed in 10 mL of dimethylformamide (DMF) with the aid of ultrasonication for 2 h to give a 1.0 mg/mL homogeneous black suspension. Then 0.2 mg of CeO2 nanoparticles were added to the MWNTs suspension and the resulted suspension was ultrasonicated for 2 h. After that, EMIMBF4 (final concentration (v/v) 50%) was dispersed in the CeO2–MWNTs composite with the aid of ultrasonication [32]. Finally, a uniform CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4 nanocomposite suspension was obtained. Before modification, the GCE was pretreated as previously described [33]. 5 μL of the CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4 suspension was dropped on the GCE and let it dry at room temperature for 2 h, thus a uniform membrane coated electrode (CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE) was obtained. The CeO2/GCE, CeO2EMIMBF4/GCE and CeO2–MWNTs/GCE were fabricated through similar procedure.

DNA probe immobilization

Immobilization of TBAs was performed by immersing the CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE into 2.0 mL PBS (pH 7.0) solution containing 5.0×10−6 M TBAs probe for 4 h at room temperature, followed by washing the electrode with 0.10 M PBS and then rinsing it with ultrapure water to remove the unimmobilized TBA probe, and this TBA probe-captured electrode was denoted as TBA/CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE.

Electrochemical measurement

A sensor fabricated was immersed into different concentrations of Pb2+ solution for 60 min at 37 °C, followed by thoroughly washing with 0.10 M PBS to remove unbound Pb2+. After that, the electrode was transferred into electrochemical cell. The electrochemical reduction of Pb2+ to Pb+ was recorded by a cathodic scan of DPV. The DPV measurement was performed in the potential range from −0.5 to 0 V in 0.10 M PBS (pH 7.4, containing 0.1 M NaNO3) with pulse amplitude of 50  ms and pulse width of 50 mV.

Results and discussion

Electrochemical characteristics of the CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4 nanocomposite membrane

CV and EIS were used for monitoring the process of the fabrication of electrochemical DNA-based sensor for the detection of Pb2+ in each step. As can be seen from Fig. 2, the CeO2–MWNTs/GCE (Fig. 2, curve b) and the CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE (Fig. 2, curve c) had larger CV current than bare GCE (Fig. 2, curve a), which ascribed to the fact that modification of the electrode with CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4 could significantly enhance the effective electrode surface area and ionic conductivity. A current decrease (Fig. 2, curve d) appeared after exposing to TBA probe. It is well-known that an immobilized TBA probe as an electron-transfer blocking layer can hinder the diffusion of ferricyanide toward the electrode surface [34]. After incubation with 1.0×10–7 M Pb2+, the formation of the Pb2+/TBA/CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE contributed to a significant increase in redox current (Fig. 2, curve e). This is probably attributed to the fact that the positive charge of Pb2+ serves to reduce the repulsion of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− to the surface, promoting the interfacial electron transfer between the redox anions in solution and the electrode [35]. The results showed that the TBA probe is immobilized on the CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE and the interaction between the electrochemical DNA-based sensor and Pb2+ arises.
Figure 2

CV of obtained in 1 mL PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.40) containing 1 mM Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− and 0.1 M KCl at a scan rate of 50 mV/s at (a) bare GCE, (b) CeO2–MWCNTs/GCE, (c) CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE, (d) TBA/CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE, and (e) TBA/CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE incubate in Pb2+ solution for 60 min.

CV of obtained in 1 mL PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.40) containing 1 mM Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− and 0.1 M KCl at a scan rate of 50 mV/s at (a) bare GCE, (b) CeO2–MWCNTs/GCE, (c) CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE, (d) TBA/CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE, and (e) TBA/CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE incubate in Pb2+ solution for 60 min. Fig. 3 shows Nyquist plots of impedance spectra obtained at different electrodes. The change in semicircle diameter is a result in the change in the interfacial resistance Ret to electron transfer from their modified electrode to ferricyanide in solution. The electrochemical response was a nearly straight line (curve a), which is characteristic for a limiting step of the electrochemical process at a bare GCE. After CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4 nanocomposite was modified (curve b), the electrochemical response was a nearly straight line. After TBA probe was immobilized onto the surface of CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE, the Ret markedly increased to 96,370 Ω (curve c). This is attributed to the fact that the redox couple of K3[Fe(CN)6]/K4[Fe(CN)6] is suffered electrostatic repulsive forces from the immobilized TBA probe. In the presence of Pb2+, the Ret significantly decreased to 44,040 Ω (curve d). This is probably attributed to the fact that the conformation variation enhances the steric and coulombic force between adjacent DNA sequences [36], resulting in a decrease of Ret. The results extracted from EIS measurements (Fig. 3) are in good agreement with the results obtained from CV (Fig. 2).
Figure 3

Nyquist plots of impedance spectra obtained in 1 mL PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.40) containing 1 mM Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− and 0.1 M KCl at (a) bare GCE, (b) CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE, (c) TBA/CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE, and (d) TBA/CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE incubate in Pb2+ solution for 60 min. The biased potential was 0.172 V. The frequency was 0.1–100 kHz and the amplitude was 5.0 mV.

Nyquist plots of impedance spectra obtained in 1 mL PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.40) containing 1 mM Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− and 0.1 M KCl at (a) bare GCE, (b) CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE, (c) TBA/CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE, and (d) TBA/CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4/GCE incubate in Pb2+ solution for 60 min. The biased potential was 0.172 V. The frequency was 0.1–100 kHz and the amplitude was 5.0 mV.

Optimization of incubation time

It was found that a different incubation time of Pb2+ caused a visible difference in the increase of peak current. Therefore, the dependence of Pb2+ incubation time on the increase of the peak current was studied to determine the optimum incubation time of Pb2+. As shown in Fig. 4, the reduction peak current increased immediately when 1.0×10–7 M Pb2+ was introduced and then tended to reach the maximum after more than 40 min. To ensure that sufficient amount of Pb2+ can be gathered on the electrode, 60 min was chosen as the Pb2+ incubation time. This incubation time is longer than that required in homogenous fluorescent methods (15 min) [14], indicating that the reaction of the surface-confined TBA probe with Pb2+ is much slower than that of the TBA probe with Pb2+ in solution. The incubation time of this electrochemical sensor for a real sample should be reduced.
Figure 4

Dependence of peak current of the DNA-based sensor on incubation time in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.40) solution containing 1.0×10–7 M Pb2+ by the CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4 nanocomposite amplified strategy. DPV parameters: pulse amplitude, 50 ms; pulse width, 50 mV.

Dependence of peak current of the DNA-based sensor on incubation time in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.40) solution containing 1.0×10–7 M Pb2+ by the CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4 nanocomposite amplified strategy. DPV parameters: pulse amplitude, 50 ms; pulse width, 50 mV.

Performance of the electrochemical sensor

The quantitative behavior of the electrochemical sensor fabricated was assessed under optimized analytical condition. Fig. 5 shows the DPV profiles of the sensor at different concentrations of Pb2+. The reduction peaks of Pb2+ appeared at ∼0.3 V by DPV detection. From Fig. 5A, it can be seen that the peak current increases with an increase of the concentration of Pb2+. The peak current had a linear relationship with the concentration of Pb2+ in the range from 1.0×10–8 to 1.0×10–5 M (Fig. 5B). The linear regression equation was I=3.202+0.1882 lgC, (unit of C is M) and the correlation coefficient was 0.9943. The detection limit was 5.0×10–9 M Pb2+ (S/N=3). The detection limit is considerably lower than 72 nM, the EPA-defined maximal contamination level for Pb2+ in drinking water. The relative standard derivation for 5.0×10–7 M Pb2+ was 3.6% (n=7). The storage stability of the electrochemical DNA-based sensors fabricated was also checked. The results showed that the current response of the electrochemical DNA-based sensor to 1.0×10–7 M Pb2+ decreased about 4.5% after the sensor was stored in air at room temperature for 7 days. This suggests that the sensor has good stability. A satisfactory detection sensitivity, reproducibility and stability of the proposed sensor are, therefore, verified.
Figure 5

(A) DPV of the electrochemical sensor for the detection of different concentrations of Pb2+ by the CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4 nanocomposite amplified strategy: (a) 1.0×10–8 M, (b) 1.0×10–7 M, (c) 1.0×10–6 M, and (d) 1.0×10–5 M. (B) The linear relationship between the peak current and the concentration of Pb2+. The DPV conditions are the same as Fig. 4.

(A) DPV of the electrochemical sensor for the detection of different concentrations of Pb2+ by the CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4 nanocomposite amplified strategy: (a) 1.0×10–8 M, (b) 1.0×10–7 M, (c) 1.0×10–6 M, and (d) 1.0×10–5 M. (B) The linear relationship between the peak current and the concentration of Pb2+. The DPV conditions are the same as Fig. 4. The electrochemical DNA-based Pb2+ sensor was also highly selective. Fig. 6 depicts the electrochemical response of Pb2+ in a mixture of five different interference metal ions. As shown in Fig. 6, the sensor hardly exhibited substantial responses to a mixture of another five different metal ions (1 mM of Ca2+, Mg2+, Hg2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+) (curve a). The cross sensitivity of the sensor in a mixture of five different metal ions containing 1.0×10–7 M Pb2+ was also examined (curve b). The signal obtained from the mixture was slight lower than that obtained from pure Pb2+ solution. These results indicate that the electrochemical DNA-based sensor for the detection of Pb2+ exhibits high specificity. The result was in agreement with that the unique Pb2+ conformation formed by the T-base of DNA sequence, which is quite specific to Pb2+ [14], [37].
Figure 6

DPV corresponding to detection of (a) 0 and (b) 1.0×10–7 M of Pb2+ in a mixture of metal ions containing Ca2+, Mg2+, Hg2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ (1 mM, each). The DPV conditions are the same as Fig. 4.

DPV corresponding to detection of (a) 0 and (b) 1.0×10–7 M of Pb2+ in a mixture of metal ions containing Ca2+, Mg2+, Hg2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ (1 mM, each). The DPV conditions are the same as Fig. 4. The practical application of the designed sensor was evaluated by determination of the recovery of spiked Pb2+ in tap water samples. The analytical results are shown in Table 1. The analytical results show the acceptable relative standard deviation and quantitative recoveries, implying that the proposed sensor was applicable for practical Pb2+ detection.
Table 1

The concentration of Pb2+ in water samples detected using the proposed electrochemical DNA-based sensor.

SamplesAdded Pb2+ concentration (M)Concentration found (M)Recovery (%)RSD (%, n=3)
11.0×10–89.52×10–795.24.2
21.0×10–79.68×10–696.83.8
31.0×10–69.76×10–597.63.2
The concentration of Pb2+ in water samples detected using the proposed electrochemical DNA-based sensor.

Conclusions

An electrochemical DNA-based sensor for the detection of Pb2+ was developed based on the TBA as a molecular recognition element and ionic liquid supported CeO2 nanoparticles–carbon nanotubes composite modification. The developed sensor exhibited a high sensitivity and selectivity. It demonstrated that the sensitivity of electrochemical DNA-based sensor could be greatly improved by using the ionic liquid supported nanoparticles–carbon nanotubes composite modified the electrode. Also because of the high sensitivity, low cost, miniaturization, and simple operation of electrochemical methods, we expect that the CeO2–MWNTs–EMIMBF4 nanocomposite amplified electrochemical DNA-based sensor could be effective in detecting Pb2+ in the actual environment, and also provide a reference value for the detection of other heavy metals ions.
  29 in total

Review 1.  Subclinical neurophysiological effects of lead: A review on peripheral, central, and autonomic nervous system effects in lead workers.

Authors:  S Araki; H Sato; K Yokoyama; K Murata
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Spectroelectrochemical sensing based on attenuated total internal reflectance stripping voltammetry. 2. Determination of mercury and lead.

Authors:  Anne T Maghasi; Sean D Conklin; Tanya Shtoyko; Aigars Piruska; John N Richardson; Carl J Seliskar; William R Heineman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Application of ionic liquids in electrochemical sensing systems.

Authors:  Muhammad J A Shiddiky; Angel A J Torriero
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 10.618

4.  Electrochemical detection of parts-per-billion lead via an electrode-bound DNAzyme assembly.

Authors:  Yi Xiao; Aaron A Rowe; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Control over surface DNA density on gold nanoparticles allows selective and sensitive detection of mercury(II).

Authors:  Chi-Wei Liu; Chih-Ching Huang; Huan-Tsung Chang
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 3.882

6.  Carbon nanotube-enhanced electrochemical aptasensor for the detection of thrombin.

Authors:  Xiaorong Liu; Yan Li; Jianbin Zheng; Juncai Zhang; Qinglin Sheng
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 6.057

Review 7.  The human body burden of lead.

Authors:  H A Schroeder; I H Tipton
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1968-12

8.  Electrochemical and bioelectrochemistry properties of room-temperature ionic liquids and carbon composite materials.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Xuee Wu; Mingkui Wang; Ying Liu; Lianxun Gao; Shaojun Dong
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  A nano-porous CeO(2)/Chitosan composite film as the immobilization matrix for colorectal cancer DNA sequence-selective electrochemical biosensor.

Authors:  Ke-Jun Feng; Yun-Hui Yang; Zhi-Jie Wang; Jian-Hui Jiang; Guo-Li Shen; Ru-Qin Yu
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 6.057

10.  Electrochemical detection of mismatched DNA using a MutS probe.

Authors:  Minseon Cho; Sohyun Lee; Se-Young Han; Jin-Young Park; Md Aminur Rahman; Yoon-Bo Shim; Changill Ban
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Studies on a glutathione coated hollow ZnO modified glassy carbon electrode; a novel Pb(ii) selective electrochemical sensor.

Authors:  Lateef Ahmad Malik; Altaf Hussain Pandith; Arshid Bashir; Aaliya Qureashi; Taniya Manzoor
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.036

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.