| Literature DB >> 29403455 |
Ye Tian1, Yanglan Tan1, Zheng Yan1, Yucai Liao2, Jie Chen3, Marthe De Boevre4, Sarah De Saeger4, Aibo Wu1.
Abstract
Fungi belonging to Fusarium genus can infect crops in the field and cause subsequent mycotoxin contamination, which leads to yield and quality losses of agricultural commodities. The mycotoxin zearalenone (ZEN) produced by several Fusarium species (such as F. graminearum and F. culmorum) is a commonly-detected contaminant in foodstuffs, posing a tremendous risk to food safety. Thus, different strategies have been studied to manage toxigenic pathogens and mycotoxin contamination. In recent years, biological control of toxigenic fungi is emerging as an environment-friendly strategy, while Trichoderma is a fungal genus with great antagonistic potentials for controlling mycotoxin producing pathogens. The primary objective of this study was to explore the potentials of selected Trichoderma isolates on ZEN-producing F. graminearum, and the second aim was to investigate the metabolic activity of different Trichoderma isolates on ZEN. Three tested Trichoderma isolates were proved to be potential candidates for control of ZEN producers. In addition, we reported the capacity of Trichoderma to convert ZEN into its reduced and sulfated forms for the first time, and provided evidences that the tested Trichoderma could not detoxify ZEN via glycosylation. This provides more insight in the interaction between ZEN-producing fungi and Trichoderma isolates.Entities:
Keywords: Fusarium; Trichoderma; biological control; modified mycotoxins; mycotoxins; zearalenone (ZEN)
Year: 2018 PMID: 29403455 PMCID: PMC5778118 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Chemical structures of ZEN, α-ZOL, β-ZOL, ZAN, α-ZAL, β-ZAL, Z14G, α-ZOL14G, and β-ZOL14G.
MS/MS parameters for detected mycotoxins in SRM mode.
| ZEN | 317.2 [M-H]− | 8.60 | 175.5 | 26 | 131.5 | 32 |
| ZAN | 319.1 [M-H]− | 8.44 | 205.5 | 23 | 160.5 | 24 |
| α-ZOL | 319.3 [M-H]− | 8.29 | 160.5 | 22 | 130.5 | 33 |
| β-ZOL | 319.3 [M-H]− | 7.73 | 160.5 | 22 | 130.5 | 33 |
| α-ZAL | 321.3 [M-H]− | 8.11 | 277.5 | 24 | 303.5 | 23 |
| β-ZAL | 321.3 [M-H]− | 7.45 | 277.5 | 23 | 303.5 | 24 |
| Z14G | 479.0 [M-H]− | 6.78 | 317.5 | 20 | 175.6 | 45 |
| α-ZOL14G | 481.0 [M-H]− | 6.61 | 319.6 | 18 | 275.5 | 37 |
| β-ZOL14G | 481.0 [M-H]− | 5.78 | 319.6 | 23 | 275.5 | 36 |
Figure 2Colony morphology of F. graminearum F1 in co-culture assay after incubation on the potato dextrose agar (PDA). F. graminearum F1 grew alone (A); F. graminearum 5035 grew against T. harzianum JF309 (B); T. koningii GIM3.137 (C); T. harzianum GIM3.442 (D); T. longibranchiatum GIM3.534 (E); T. harzianum Q710613 (F); T. atroviride Q710251 (G); T. asperellum Q710682 (H); and T. virens Q710925 (I).
The inhibitory effect of antagonistic Trichoderma isolates on mycelial growth of F. graminearum F1 in dual culture.
| FG F1 vs. | Gc | 0.49 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Gt | 0.37 | <0.0001 | ||
| FG F1 vs. | Gc | 0.49 | <0.0001 | NS |
| Gt | 0.45 | <0.0001 | ||
| FG F1 vs. | Gc | 0.49 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Gt | 0.40 | <0.0001 | ||
| FG F1 vs. | Gc | 0.49 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Gt | 0.42 | <0.0001 | ||
| FG F1 vs. | Gc | 0.49 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Gt | 0.35 | <0.0001 | ||
| FG F1 vs. | Gc | 0.49 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Gt | 0.33 | <0.0001 | ||
| FG F1 vs. | Gc | 0.49 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Gt | 0.32 | <0.0001 | ||
| FG F1 vs. | Gc | 0.49 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Gt | 0.40 | <0.0001 | ||
The radial growth rate of F. graminearum F1 facing antagonists on PDA medium compared with the radial growth rate of the control.
a, slope of the growth curve of F. graminearum (growth rate, mm/hour).
P, significance of regression line.
P slope, significance of the difference between slopes of the pathogen F1 in the presence (Gt) and absence (Gc) of tested Trichoderma isolates.
NS, no significant difference.
Figure 3The inhibitory effect of antagonistic Trichoderma isolates on mycotoxin production (ZEN, A; ZAN, B; α-ZOL, C; and β-ZOL, D) of F. graminearum F1 in co-culture assay. From left to right: F. graminearum F1 grew alone, and grew against T. harzianum JF309, T. koningii GIM3.137, T. harzianum GIM3.442, T. longibranchiatum GIM3.534, T. harzianum Q710613, T. atroviride Q710251, T. asperellum Q710682, and T. virens Q710925. *P < 0.05, significantly different from control.
Figure 4The effects of ZEN on mycelial growth of Trichoderma isolates: T. harzianum JF309 (A), T. koningii GIM3.137 (B), T. harzianum GIM3.442 (C), T. longibranchiatum GIM3.534 (D), T. harzianum Q710613 (E), T. atroviride Q710251 (F), T. asperellum Q710682 (G), and T. virens Q710925 (H). The tested Trichoderma isolates were inoculated on PDA amended with ZEN at different concentrations (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 μg/ml), and the control was inoculated on PDA without ZEN. *P < 0.01, significantly different from control.
Figure 5SRM chromatograms of α-ZOL and β-ZOL in standard solution (10 ng/ml) (A) and in Trichoderma samples after 2 μg/ml ZEN treatment (B–I). The red line (m/z 319.3 > m/z 160.5) and blue line (m/z 319.3 > m/z 160.5) represent SRM traces for α-ZOL and β-ZOL, and the chromatographic retention time was used to distinguish the two ZOL isomers.
Figure 6Concentrations of the metabolites (α-ZOL and β-ZOL) detected in samples of 2 μg/ml ZEN-treated Trichoderma isolates on PDA medium.
Summary of metabolites in samples of ZEN-treated Trichoderma isolates on PDA medium analyzed by LC-HRMS.
| Mycotoxin standard | ZEN | 317.1394 | 317.1386 | 289.15, 273.16, 175.07, 149.10, 131.09 |
| α-ZOL, β-ZOL | 319.1551 | 319.1547 | 291.21, 275.20, 257.26, 174.12 | |
| Z14S | 397.0963 | 397.0953 | 317.14, 289.15, 273.16, 175.07, 149.10, 131.09 | |
| ZOL14S | 399.1119 | ND | ND | |
| Z14S | 397.0963 | 397.0949 | 317.14, 289.15, 273.16, 175.07, 149.10, 131.09 | |
| ZOL14S | 399.1119 | ND | ND | |
| Z14S | 397.0963 | 397.0954 | 317.14, 289.15, 273.16, 175.07, 149.10, 131.09 | |
| ZOL14S | 399.1119 | ND | ND | |
| Z14S | 397.0963 | 397.0948 | 317.14, 289.15, 273.16, 175.07, 149.10, 131.09 | |
| ZOL14S | 399.1119 | ND | ND | |
| Z14S | 397.0963 | 397.0950 | 317.14, 289.15, 273.16, 175.07, 149.10, 131.09 | |
| ZOL14S | 399.1119 | ND | ND | |
| Z14S | 397.0963 | 397.0952 | 317.14, 289.15, 273.16, 175.07, 149.10, 131.09 | |
| ZOL14S | 399.1119 | ND | ND | |
| Z14S | 397.0963 | 397.0953 | 317.14, 289.15, 273.16, 175.07, 149.10, 131.09 | |
| ZOL14S | 399.1119 | 399.1112 | 319.15, 291.21, 275.20, 257.26, 174.12 | |
| Z14S | 397.0963 | 397.0946 | 317.14, 289.15, 273.16, 175.07, 149.10, 131.09 | |
| ZOL14S | 399.1119 | ND | ND | |
ND, Not detected.
Figure 7The proposed metabolic detoxification process of mycotoxin ZEN in Trichoderma isolates.