| Literature DB >> 29403347 |
Julien Valette1,2, Clémence Ligneul1,2, Charlotte Marchadour1,2, Chloé Najac1,2, Marco Palombo3.
Abstract
In vivo diffusion-weighted MR spectroscopy (DW-MRS) allows measuring diffusion properties of brain metabolites. Unlike water, most metabolites are confined within cells. Hence, their diffusion is expected to purely reflect intracellular properties, opening unique possibilities to use metabolites as specific probes to explore cellular organization and structure. However, interpretation and modeling of DW-MRS, and more generally of intracellular diffusion, remains difficult. In this perspective paper, we will focus on the study of the time-dependency of brain metabolite apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). We will see how measuring ADC over several orders of magnitude of diffusion times, from less than 1 ms to more than 1 s, allows clarifying our understanding of brain metabolite diffusion, by firmly establishing that metabolites are neither massively transported by active mechanisms nor massively confined in subcellular compartments or cell bodies. Metabolites appear to be instead diffusing in long fibers typical of neurons and glial cells such as astrocytes. Furthermore, we will evoke modeling of ADC time-dependency to evaluate the effect of, and possibly quantify, some structural parameters at various spatial scales, departing from a simple model of hollow cylinders and introducing additional complexity, either short-ranged (such as dendritic spines) or long-ranged (such as cellular fibers ramification). Finally, we will discuss the experimental feasibility and expected benefits of extending the range of diffusion times toward even shorter and longer values.Entities:
Keywords: ADC time-dependency; brain metabolites; diffusion time; intracellular diffusion; microstructure
Year: 2018 PMID: 29403347 PMCID: PMC5780428 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Figure 1ADC time-dependency as measured in different published works from ultra-short t using oscillating gradients [down to t ~ 0.5 ms when taking t = 9/(64f) (Novikov and Kiselev, 2011), where f is the oscillating gradient frequency], up to very long t ~ 1 s using stimulated echo (data acquired at t ~ 2 s and reported in Palombo et al., 2016a are not shown here for clarity). Data points are ADC averaged for NAA, tCho, and tCr, but the trend is similar for each metabolite. The fact that ADC drops when t is increased at very short t, and then remains fairly stable at approximately one third of the ADC value measured at ultra-short times, is very consistent with metabolite diffusion mainly occurring in long and thin fibers (indeed, in the ideal situation of infinitely long and straight fibers, and in the case of an isotropic distribution of fiber orientations, ADC would drop from D at infinitely short t to D/3 once full restriction has been reached in the plane perpendicular to fiber axis, and then would stabilize at D/3 at longer t, where D is the free intracellular diffusivity). In a situation with metabolites massively confined in subcellular regions such as organelles or cell bodies, the ADC would drop to ~ 0 at long t over the observed time-range. Active transports would rather lead to ADC increasing with t, at least for the time-scales at which these transports become significant compared to diffusion.
Figure 2Trying to approach the free intracellular diffusion coefficient of brain metabolites using oscillating gradients. On this figure the ADC measured for NAA, tCr, and tCho, in the mouse brain at 11.7 T using a gradient coil capable of reaching 0.75 T/m along each axis (red open squares) (Ligneul and Valette, 2017) and the rat brain at 7 T using a gradient coil capable of reaching 1.5 T/m along each axis (blue diamonds) (Ligneul et al., 2017a), are displayed as a function of the inverse of square root of the angular frequency [since a linear trend is expected for ADC(ω−1/2) in the Mitra limit]. For better consistency between datasets, the first rat data obtained with oscillating gradients (Marchadour et al., 2012), which were probably slightly biased toward higher values due to some motion artifact, are not displayed here. Data points on the left (smallest ω−1/2) correspond to maximal OG frequency f = 665 Hz. Error bars stand for standard errors of the mean.