Literature DB >> 29402170

Residual limb fluid volume change and volume accommodation: Relationships to activity and self-report outcomes in people with trans-tibial amputation.

Joan E Sanders1, Robert T Youngblood1, Brian J Hafner1, Marcia A Ciol1, Katheryn J Allyn1, David Gardner1, John C Cagle1, Christian B Redd1, Colin R Dietrich1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fluctuations in limb volume degrade prosthesis fit and require users to accommodate changes using management strategies, such as donning and doffing prosthetic socks.
OBJECTIVES: To examine how activities and self-report outcomes relate to daily changes in residual limb fluid volume and volume accommodation. STUDY
DESIGN: Standardized, two-part laboratory protocol with an interim observational period.
METHODS: Participants were classified as "accommodators" or "non-accommodators," based on self-report prosthetic sock use. Participants' residual limb fluid volume change was measured using a custom bioimpedance analyzer and a standardized in-laboratory activity protocol. Self-report health outcomes were assessed with the Socket Comfort Score and Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire. Activity was monitored while participants left the laboratory for at least 3 h. They then returned to repeat the bioimpedance test protocol.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine people were enrolled. Morning-to-afternoon percent limb fluid volume change per hour was not strongly correlated to percent time weight-bearing or to self-report outcomes. As a group, non-accommodators ( n = 15) spent more time with their prosthesis doffed and reported better outcomes than accommodators.
CONCLUSION: Factors other than time weight-bearing may contribute to morning-to-afternoon limb fluid volume changes and reported satisfaction with the prosthesis among trans-tibial prosthesis users. Temporary doffing may be a more effective and satisfying accommodation method than sock addition. Clinical relevance Practitioners should be mindful that daily limb fluid volume change and prosthesis satisfaction are not dictated exclusively by activity. Temporarily doffing the prosthesis may slow daily limb fluid volume loss and should be investigated as an alternative strategy to sock addition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amputation stumps; artificial limbs; bioimpedance; outcome assessment; residual limb volume; socket fit; volume accommodation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29402170     DOI: 10.1177/0309364617752983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

1.  Developing a control framework for self-adjusting prosthetic sockets incorporating tissue injury risk estimation and generalized predictive control.

Authors:  F M Mbithi; A J Chipperfield; J W Steer; A S Dickinson
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2021-12-02

2.  Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alix Chadwell; Laura Diment; M Micó-Amigo; Dafne Z Morgado Ramírez; Alex Dickinson; Malcolm Granat; Laurence Kenney; Sisary Kheng; Mohammad Sobuh; Robert Ssekitoleko; Peter Worsley
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Volume Fluctuations in Active and Nonactive Transtibial Prosthetics Users.

Authors:  Nur Afiqah Hamzah; Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak; Mohd Sayuti Ab Karim; Siti Zuliana Salleh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Changes in Tissue Composition and Load Response After Transtibial Amputation Indicate Biomechanical Adaptation.

Authors:  J L Bramley; P R Worsley; D L Bader; C Everitt; A Darekar; L King; A S Dickinson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Reported Outcome Measures in Studies of Real-World Ambulation in People with a Lower Limb Amputation: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Mellema; Terje Gjøvaag
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.