Literature DB >> 29402085

Filter-Based Protein Digestion (FPD): A Detergent-Free and Scaffold-Based Strategy for TMT Workflows.

Ekaterina Stepanova1, Steven P Gygi1, Joao A Paulo1.   

Abstract

High-throughput proteome profiling requires thorough optimization to achieve comprehensive analysis. We developed a filter aided sample preparation (FASP)-like, detergent-free method, termed Filter-Based Protein Digestion (FPD). We compared FPD to protein extraction methods commonly used in isobaric tag-based proteome profiling, namely trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and chloroform-methanol (C-M) precipitation. We divided a mammalian whole cell lysate from the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line for parallel protein processing with TCA (n = 3), C-M (n = 2), and FPD using either 10 kDa (n = 3) or 30 kDa (n = 3) molecular weight cutoff membranes. We labeled each sample with tandem mass tag (TMT) reagents to construct a TMT11-plex experiment. In total, 8654 proteins were quantified across all samples. Pairwise comparisons showed very little deviation for individual protein abundance measurements between the two FPD methods, whereas TCA and FPD showed the most difference. Specifically, membrane proteins were more readily quantified when samples were processed using TCA precipitation than other methods tested. However, globally, only 4% of proteins differed greater than 4-fold in the most divergent pair of protein extraction methods (i.e., FPD10 and TCA). We conclude that the detergent-free FPD strategy, particularly using the faster-flowing 30 kDa filter, is a seamless alteration to high-throughput TMT workflows.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FASP; Lumos; SPS-MS3; TMT; precipitation; sample preparation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29402085      PMCID: PMC5984590          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  25 in total

1.  Quantitative mass spectrometry-based multiplexing compares the abundance of 5000 S. cerevisiae proteins across 10 carbon sources.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Jeremy D O'Connell; Robert A Everley; Jonathon O'Brien; Micah A Gygi; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  A comprehensive proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis of yeast deletion mutants of 14-3-3 orthologs and associated effects of rapamycin.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.

Authors:  J Kyte; R F Doolittle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Thymosin-beta 4 gene. Preliminary characterization and expression in tissues, thymic cells, and lymphocytes.

Authors:  J Gómez-Márquez; M Dosil; F Segade; X R Bustelo; J G Pichel; F Dominguez; M Freire
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1989-10-15       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  MStern Blotting-High Throughput Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) Membrane-Based Proteomic Sample Preparation for 96-Well Plates.

Authors:  Sebastian T Berger; Saima Ahmed; Jan Muntel; Nerea Cuevas Polo; Richard Bachur; Alex Kentsis; Judith Steen; Hanno Steen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Negative regulation of the heat shock transcriptional response by HSBP1.

Authors:  S H Satyal; D Chen; S G Fox; J M Kramer; R I Morimoto
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  iFASP: combining isobaric mass tagging with filter-aided sample preparation.

Authors:  Gary S McDowell; Aleksandr Gaun; Hanno Steen
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Global Analysis of Protein Expression and Phosphorylation Levels in Nicotine-Treated Pancreatic Stellate Cells.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Aleksandr Gaun; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  A modified FASP protocol for high-throughput preparation of protein samples for mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jeremy Potriquet; Marut Laohaviroj; Jeffrey M Bethony; Jason Mulvenna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Enhanced FASP (eFASP) to increase proteome coverage and sample recovery for quantitative proteomic experiments.

Authors:  Jonathan Erde; Rachel R Ogorzalek Loo; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.466

View more
  4 in total

1.  Streamlined Tandem Mass Tag (SL-TMT) Protocol: An Efficient Strategy for Quantitative (Phospho)proteome Profiling Using Tandem Mass Tag-Synchronous Precursor Selection-MS3.

Authors:  José Navarrete-Perea; Qing Yu; Steven P Gygi; Joao A Paulo
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  TMT Labeling for the Masses: A Robust and Cost-efficient, In-solution Labeling Approach.

Authors:  Jana Zecha; Shankha Satpathy; Tamara Kanashova; Shayan C Avanessian; M Harry Kane; Karl R Clauser; Philipp Mertins; Steven A Carr; Bernhard Kuster
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 3.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics to Unveil the Non-coding RNA World.

Authors:  Roberto Giambruno; Marija Mihailovich; Tiziana Bonaldi
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2018-11-08

Review 4.  Quantitative Proteomics Using Isobaric Labeling: A Practical Guide.

Authors:  Xiulan Chen; Yaping Sun; Tingting Zhang; Lian Shu; Peter Roepstorff; Fuquan Yang
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 6.409

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.