Elsinopirins A-D, Decalin Polyketides from the Ascomycete Elsinoё pyri.

In course of our screening for new secondary metabolites from ecological niche specialized, phytopathogenic fungi, the plant pathogen Elsinoё pyri, strain 2203C, was found to produce four novel compounds (1-4), which were named elsinopirins A-D, in addition to the known metabolite elsinochrome A (5). After isolation by preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), their structures, including relative stereochemistry, were elucidated by 1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS) data. Finally, absolute stereochemistry was assigned by chemical shifts of Mosher's esters (α-methoxy-α-trifluoromethylphenylacetic acid; MTPA) derivatives of elsinopirin B (2). The compounds were found to be devoid of significant antibacterial, antifungal, and cytotoxic activities.

1. Introduction

Elsinoё pyri is a fruit and leaf pathogen causing anthracnose disease symptoms and spots on apple and pear in temperate regions worldwide. The species is easily overlooked and its disease symptoms can be confused with the common pathogen Venturia inaequalis, the major apple scab agent in commercial production settings. Disease management strategies applied against V. inaequalis effectively suppress E. pyri, as the latter is commonly encountered in ecological production settings or private gardens [1,2,3]. The host specificity of Ep, its ability to compete with other plant cuticle-inhabiting fungi, and its slow in vitro growth triggered our interest in the secondary metabolite production of this fungus. According to our literature search, the species was hitherto untapped with respect to secondary metabolites. However, some pigments belonging to the class of perylene quinones named elsinochromes had been reported previously from a different species of Elsinoё [4,5]. We recently found moderate antimicrobial effects in cultures of strain 2202C, which was identified as E. pyri in our ongoing studies on bioactive compounds from plant-associated Ascomycota [6,7,8]. To assess its potential for secondary metabolite production, strain 2203C was cultivated on potato-dextrose-agar (Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) plate medium; extracts showed the presence of five metabolites that were isolated using preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Figure 1). Herein we describe their isolation, structure elucidation, and biological characterization.

Figure 1

Structures of the secondary metabolites isolated from Elsinoё piri strain 2203C.

2. Results

2.1. Structure Elucidation

Elsinopirin A (1) was isolated as a colorless oil; its HRESIMS (high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry) data indicated a molecular formula of C19H28O3, indicating a molecule with six degrees of unsaturation. 1H and HSQC (heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectroscopy) spectra revealed the presence of four methyl, two methylene, four olefinic, and seven aliphatic methine groups. The 13C spectrum furthermore indicated the presence of one ketone and one carboxylic acid. Starting from the methyls 16-H3, 17-H3, 18-H3, 19-H3 and the olefinic protons 11-H-15-H, one large spin system was assembled by 1H, 1H correlation spectroscopy (COSY) and total correlated spectroscopy (TOCSY) correlations (Figure 2). 1H,13C heteronuclear multiple bond (HMBC) correlations from 13-H/14-H to C-15 connected the carboxylic acid group to the trans diene (Δ11,12 15.2 Hz, Δ13,14 15.3 Hz), and correlations from 1-H, 2-H, 3-H, 17-H3 as well as 5-H, 9-H2, 10-H resulted in the assignment of the planar structure of 1. The relative configuration was addressed by 1H,1H ROESY (rotating-frame nuclear Overhauser effect correlation spectroscopy) correlations and coupling constants. The large coupling constants of 4-H, 5-H,6-H, 7-Hb, 8-H, 9-Hb, 10-H around 10 Hz, which were confirmed by a J-resolved spectrum due to signal overlaps, indicated axial orientations of these atoms. Consequently, equatorial orientations of 18-H3, 19-H3 and the pentenoic side chain were deduced. ROESY correlations (Figure 3) were observed in ring B between 5-H, 7-Hb, 9-Hb on the β face of the molecule, and between 6-H, 8-H, and 10-H on the α face. For ring A, ROESY correlations between 2-H, 4-H, and 10-H indicated pseudoaxial orientations for these protons on the α face, resulting in equatorial orientations of 17-H3 and the pentenoic side chain. Moreover, a strong ROESY correlation was observed between 5-H and 16-H3 on the β face, indicating an axial orientation of 16-H3. Since the absolute stereochemistry of the metabolite family was established with 2 by Mosher’s method (see below), the configuration of elsinopirin A (1) was assigned as 2R, 3R, 4S, 5R, 6R, 8S, 10S.

Figure 2

Selected correlation spectroscopy (COSY)/total correlated spectroscopy (TOCSY) (bold lines) and heteronuclear multiple bond (HMBC) (arrows) correlations indicative for the planar structure of elsinopirin A (1).

Figure 3

ROESY (rotating-frame nuclear Overhauser effect correlation spectroscopy) correlations indicative for the relative configuration of elsinopirin A (1); solid arrows are above main plane; dotted arrows are below.

The molecular formula C19H28O4 of elsinopirin B (2) indicated the presence of an additional oxygen atom compared to 1. The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of 2 were highly similar to those of 1, with the key difference being the replacement of one methylene by an oxymethine group. Since both methyls 18-H3 and 19-H3 showed HMBC correlations to this additional oxymethine, it was identified as C-7. Because 7-H shows two large coupling constants around 9 Hz to both 6-H and 8-H, and ROESY correlations to 5-H/18-H3/19-H3, a β-axial orientation was assigned for 7-H. The secondary hydroxyl function of 2 was utilized to assign the absolute configuration of the elsinopyirin family by Mosher’s method. The positive ΔδSR values of 6-H/19-H3 and negative ones for 8-H/9-H2/18-H3 were the characteristic for a 7R configuration (Figure 4). In this experiment, COSY and TOCSY determined the chemical shifts of protons in the vicinity of the secondary alcohol function of C-7. An HMBC correlation from 18-H3 to methylene C-9, which was clearly identified by a phase-sensitive HSQC experiment, was utilized to distinguish 18-H3 from 19-H3.

Figure 4

ΔδSR chemical shifts of MTPA (α-methoxy-α-trifluoromethylphenylacetic acid) (Mosher) derivatives of elsinopirin B (2).

Elsinopirin C (3) was analyzed for the same molecular formula C19H28O4 as elsinopirin B (2). Again, the NMR spectra of 3 were highly similar to those of 1. The key difference was identified in the replacement of a methine by an oxygenated quaternary carbon atom. This was located to be C-8 by an HMBC correlation of 18-H3. Because 8-OH exhibits ROESY correlations to 6-H and 10-H, whereas 18-H3 correlated to 7-Ha and 9-Ha, an 8R configuration was assigned for C-8.

Elsinopirin D (4) was analyzed as C17H26O3 by HRESIMS. This accounted for the formal loss of a C2H2 fragment compared to the parental metabolite 1. The NMR spectra of 4 were highly similar to those of 1, with the key difference being the presence of only two olefinic methines instead of four. Consequently, 4 was assigned the same metabolite core as 1, but bearing a propenoic acid instead of the pentadienoic side chain. Nearly identical 13C chemical shifts indicated identical relative and absolute configurations.

2.2. Semisynthetic Conversions

Since a methyl ester moiety was proven to be necessary for the activity of a structurally close relative of 1–4 [9], methyl esters of elsinopirins A–D (6–9) were generated by the methylation of 1–4 through diazomethane (Figure 5).

Figure 5

Semisynthetic conversion of elsinopirins A–D (1–4) into their methyl esters 6–9.

2.3. Biological Activity

The biological activity of metabolites 1–5 was assessed against a broad test panel of bacteria and fungi as well as the cell lines L929 and KB3.1 [10]. However, no inhibition was observed for the Gram-positive bacteria Bacillus subtilis, Micrococcus luteus, Mycobacterium sp., Staphylococcus aureus, the Gram-negative bacteria Chromobacterium violaceum, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the filamentous fungus Mucor hiemalis, and the yeasts Candida albicans, Pichia anomala, Rhodotorula glutinis, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe up to 66 µg/mL. In the same assay, 5 was active against Mucor hiemalis (Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) = 16.6 µg/mL), B. subtilis (MIC = 16.6 µg/mL), and S. aureus (MIC = 8.3 µg/mL). Compounds 1a–4a were tested only against S. aureus due to low substance amounts, but were inactive up to 100 µm/mL.

Only a very weak activity was observed for 1 against the cell line KB3.1 (inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50) = 37 µg/mL), whereas no activity at all was observed for compounds 2–4 and 1a–4a up to 66 µg/mL. In contrast, elsinochrome A (5) showed cytotoxic effects of IC50 = 4 µg/mL against L929 and 1.1 µg/mL against KB3.1 cells.

3. Discussion

Elsinopirins A–D (1–4) belong to a group of metabolites containing the ‘decalin’ motif [11]. This group comprises compounds from the isoprenoid and polyketide pathways and includes the famous compound lovastatin. Interestingly, the polyketide decalin skeleton is believed to be biosynthesized by an enzymatic intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction. More specifically, 1–4 belong to a subgroup possessing a penta-2,4-dienoic side chain connected to the decalin core. The majority of these were detected in cultures of Penicillium species and show a plethora of interesting bioactivities. Tanzawaic acid B from Penicillium citrinum inhibited superoxide anion production in human neutrophils [12]. Tanzawaic acids A, E, and K showed inhibition of the conidial germination in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in concentrations of about 25 µg/mL [13]. Hynapenes A–C, isolated from a soil-inhabiting Penicillium species, were effective against monensin-resisant Eimeria tenella [14].

However, no bioactivity could be detected for the elsinopirins A–D (1–4). In the case of the structurally closely related metabolite coprophilin, the metabolites carboxylic acid moiety was methylated and showed anticoccidial activity [9], whereas its free acid derivative was inactive. It was speculated that the differences in biological activity are mainly based on differences in cellular uptake. Consequently, the free carboxylic acids 1–4 were methylated by diazomethane. However, the methyl ester derivatives 6–9 did not show any activity in our broad test panel either. Therefore, we cannot speculate deeply about the biological function of these metabolites.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General

Optical rotations were determined with a Perkin-Elmer (Waitham, Middlesex County, MA, USA) 241 spectrometer and ultraviolet (UV) spectra were recorded with a Shimadzu (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) UV-Vis spectrophotometer UV-2450. NMR spectra were recorded with Bruker Avance (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) III 700 spectrometer with a 5 mm TCI CryoProbe Bruker (1H 700 MHz, 13C 175 MHz) and Bruker Avance III 500 (1H 500 MHz, 13C 125 MHz) spectrometers. Chemical shifts δ were referenced to the solvents: chloroform-d (1H, δ = 7.27 ppm; 13C, δ = 77.0 ppm), pyridine-d5 (1H, δ = 7.22 ppm; 13C, δ = 123.9 ppm), DMSO-d6 (1H, δ = 2.50 ppm; 13C, δ = 49.15 ppm). Standard pulse programs provided by Bruker were utilized: 1H: zg30, 13C: zgpg30, COSY: cosyfpppqf, Jresolved: jresqf, TOCSY: mlevphpp, ROESY: roesyphpp.2 (mixing time: 500 ms), HSQC: hsqcedetgpsisp2.2, HMBC: hmbcgplpndqf. ESIMS and HRESIMS mass spectra were obtained with an Agilent (Waldbronn, Germany) 1200 series HPLC-UV system (column 2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 µm, C18 Acquity UPLC BEH (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), solvent A: H2O + 0.1% formic acid; solvent B: AcCN + 0.1% formic acid, gradient: 5% B for 0.5 min increasing to 100% B in 19.5 min, maintaining 100% B for 5 min, flow rate = 0.6 mL/min, UV-visible detection 200–600 nm) combined with electrospray ion trap mass spectrometry (amaZon SL ion trap, Bruker) and electrospray ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS) (maXis II, Bruker), respectively. Isolation of pure compounds was achieved with a model 2020 preparative HPLC system (Gilson, Middleton, WI, USA). A VP Nucleodur C18 ec column (250 × 21 mm, 5 µm, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) with 15 mL/min was used as the stationary phase. The mobile phase was composed of deionized water (Milli-Q, Millipore, Schwalbach, Germany; solvent A) and acetonitrile (AcCN, solvent B).

4.2. Fungal Material

Ripe apples showing the colonization of sooty blotch fungi and scab-like symptoms were collected in Vesela Gora, Slovenia, by H. J. Schroers in October 2009. The E. pyri strain 2203C was isolated by Ajda Medjedović. Taxonomic identification was based on morphological characters and confirmed by generating the DNA barcode sequence of the internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 and the 5.8S rDNA of the rRNA gene cluster using reference sequences KX887267 and KX887268 from Gen Bank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) of strains CBS 163.29 and CBS 179.82 [3].

4.3. Fermentation and Downstream Processing

The solid-state cultivation of strain 2203C was carried out on PD agar plates (Potato Dextrose Agar, Carl Roth). The plates (ca. 30 mL medium) were inoculated with 3 mL of a liquid pre-culture in YMG medium (1.0% malt extract, 0.4% glucose, 0.4% yeast extract, pH 6.3). The agar of the culture changed to a red color and was harvested after 14 days of growth at 23 °C.

The agar plates were cut into small pieces and poured into a glass bottle, overlaid with ca. 100 mL of ethyl acetate. The bottle was then incubated in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. Thereafter, the ethyl acetate was filtered and evaporated in vacuo to yield 72.7 mg of an oily crude extract.

The crude extract was dissolved in 1 mL of methanol and filtered through a reversed phase solid phase cartridge (Strata-X 33 mm, Polymeric Reversed Phase; Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany). The filtrate was subsequently subjected to preparative RP HPLC using a Kromasil precolumn (Kromasil, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 100 C18; 50 × 20 mm; 7 µm) and a Nucleodur column (Nucleodur 100 C18ec; 250 × 21 mm; 5 µm) with the following conditions: mobile phase with solvent A (deionized water) and solvent B (acetonitrile), linear gradient of solvent B from 40 to 80% in 45 min, an increase to 100% in 5 min, followed by isocratic conditions at 100% solvent B for 6 min, flow rate of 15 mL/min, UV peak detection at 254 and 210 nm. The obtained fractions were combined according to the main peaks, leading to four main fractions which were evaporated and analyzed by HPLC-MS. The fraction with a retention time of 22 min contained 4 (1.6 mg), the one with 28 min contained 1 (1.8 mg), and the one with 34 min contained metabolite 5 (2.0 mg). The first fraction, which was eluted at around 10 min, contained two different substances (2 and 3) and was therefore forwarded to another preparative HPLC. The conditions were the same as before, besides the gradient which was set to a linear gradient of solvent B from 20 to 45% followed by an increase to 100% in 5 min and isocratic conditions for 6 min. The fractions were again combined according to the peaks, evaporated, and analyzed by HPLC-MS to yield 2 (2.4 mg) and 3 (2.7 mg). Five pure compounds were finally obtained, and their physicochemical characteristics are summarized below. NMR and mass spectra are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

4.3.1. Elsinopirin A (1)

Colorless oil. [α]25D = +3.1 (c 0.2, MeOH). UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε): 262 nm (4.38). 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3): see Table 1; 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3): see Table 2. HRESIMS m/z 305.2110 ([M + H]+, calcd for C19H29O3 305.2111).

Table 1

13C chemical shifts (175 MHz for 1, 2, 4; 125 MHz for 3) of elsinopirins A–D (1–4).

	1 a	2 b	3 b	4 a
1	212.5, qC	211.8, qC	212.6, qC	212.1, qC
2	49.0, CH	47.5, CH	47.8, CH	48.9, CH
3	45.9, CH	45.1, CH	45.4, CH	45.9, CH
4	51.8, CH	50.6, CH	50.2, CH	50.9, CH
5	49.4, CH	47.5, CH	48.5, CH	49.2, CH
6	39.1, CH	45.6, CH	33.9, CH	38.9, CH
7	45.9, CH2	79.1, CH	49.0, CH2	45.7, CH2
8	31.3, CH	37.9, CH	67.0, qC	31.3, CH
9	33.8, CH2	32.0, CH2	38.0, CH2	33.8, CH2
10	54.2, CH	52.2, CH	48.6, CH	54.1, CH
11	151.0, CH	149.8, CH	149.9, CH	157.4, CH
12	126.8, CH	126.5, CH	126.7, CH	118.9, CH
13	147.0, CH	144.5, CH	144.4, CH	169.9, qC
14	118.5, CH	120.4, CH	120.6, CH
15	170.8, qC	167.8. qC	167.8, qC
16	8.9, CH3	8.7, CH3	8.6, CH3	8.9, CH3
17	11.6, CH3	11.4, CH3	11.6, CH3	11.5, CH3
18	22.4, CH3	19.5, CH3	31.3, CH3	22.3, CH3
19	22.7. CH3	17.6, CH3	22.0, CH3	22.4, CH3

a in CDCl3, b in DMSO-d6.

Table 2

1H chemical shifts (700 MHz) of elsinopirins A–D (1–4).

	1 a	2 b	3 b	4 a
2	2.79, qd (6.7, 5.5)	2.88, qd (6.7, 5.5)	2.91, dq (8.5, 6.5)	2.80, m
3	2.09, m	1.99, m	1.98, dqd (8.5, 6.5, 3.4)	2.11, m
4	2.72, ddd (10.5, 9.5, 3.6)	2.80, ddd (10.5, 9.3, 3.4)	2.81, ddd (10.5, 9.3, 3.4)	2.78, m
5	1.39, ddd (10.5,10.0, 9.0)	1.30, ddd (11.0, 10.5, 9.8)	1.30, ddd (11.0, 10.5, 9.8)	1.44, ddd (10.5,10.0, 9.0)
6	1.49, m	1.30, m	1.81, m	1.49, m
7	1.61, br d (14.0)	2.39, m	1.43, br d (13.3)	1.62, br d (13.4)
	0.73, dt (14.0, 12.0)	OH: 4.44, br d (6.0)	1.00, dd (13.3, 12.2)	0.75, m
8	1.41, m	1.23, m		1.41, m
9	1.93, br d (13.9)	1.75, br d (13.4)	1.67, br d (13.4)	1.94, br d (13.6)
	0.92, m	0.90, dt (13.4, 12.0)	1.15, dd (13.4, 12.4)	0.95, m
10	2.08, m	2.23, dd (12.0, 11.0)	2.52, m	2.09, m
11	6.33, dd (15.2, 9.5)	6.41, dd (15.4, 9.3)	6.39, dd (15.0, 9.3)	7.22, dd (15.5, 10.0)
12	6.24, dd (15.2, 11.0)	6.27, dd (15.4, 10.8)	6.29, dd (15.0, 10.8)	5.88, d (15.5)
13	7.37, dd (15.3, 11.0)	7.19, dd (15.3, 10.8)	7.18, dd (15.3, 10.8)
14	5.84, d (15.3)	5.80, d (15.3)	5.80, d (15.3)
16	0.70, d (7.1)	0.59, d (7.1)	0.59, d (7.2)	0.73, d (7.1)
17	0.98, d (6.7)	0.83, d (6.7)	0.83, d (6.5)	0.98, d (6.7)
18	0.91, d (7.0)	0.94, d (6.5)	1.09, s	0.92, d (6.5)
18	0.92, d (7.0)	0.97, d (6.5)	0.83, d (6.5)	0.93, d (6.5)

a in CDCl3, b in DMSO-d6.

4.3.2. Elsinopirin B (2)

Colorless oil. [α]25D = +9.7 (c 0.2, MeOH). UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε): 262 nm (4.43). 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): see Table 2; 13C NMR (175 MHz, DMSO-d6): see Table 1; 1H NMR (pyridine-d5, 700 MHz): δH 7.76 (dd, J = 15.0 Hz, 10.5 Hz, 13-H), 6.29–6.38 (m, 11-H, 12-H, 14-H), 2.74–2.82 (m, 2-H, 7-H), 2.73 (td, J = 9.7 Hz, 3.0 Hz, 4-H), 2.16 (ddd, J = 12.0 Hz, 11.0 Hz, 2.5 Hz, 10-H), 2.07 (dt, J = 13.9 Hz, 3.3 Hz, 9-Ha), 1.98 (m, H-3), 1.62 (m, 6-H), 1.57 (m, 8-H), 1.54 (m, 5-H), 1.33 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 19-H), 1.23 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 18-H), 1.29 (dt, J = 13.9 Hz, 12.0 Hz, 9-Hb), 1.02 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 17-H), 0.68 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 16-H); 13C NMR (pyridine-d5, 175 MHz): δC 211.5 (C-1), 148.8* (C-11), 144.2 (C-13), 127.4 (C-12), 122.3 * (C-14), 79.9 (C-7), 53.3 (C-10), 51.6 (C-4), 48.5 (C-2), 48.2 (C-5), 46.8 (C-6), 45.7 (C-3), 38.9 (C-8), 32.6 (C-9), 19.7 (C-18), 18.1 (C-19), 11.7 (C-17), 8.8 (C-16), *: these chemical shifts were extracted from a 1H,13C HSQC spectrum. HRESIMS m/z 321.2059 ([M + H] +, calcd for C19H29O4 321.2060).

4.3.3. Elsinopirin C (3)

Colorless oil. [α]25D = +12.7 (c 0.3, MeOH). UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε): 262 nm (4.40). 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): see Table 2; 13C NMR (175 MHz, DMSO-d6): see Table 1. HRESIMS m/z 321.2061 ([M + H]+, calcd for C19H29O3 305.2060).

4.3.4. Elsinopirin D (4)

Colorless oil. [α]25D =+ 2.7 (c 0.1, MeOH). UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε): 212 nm (4.23). 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3): see Table 2; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3): see Table 1. HRESIMS m/z 279.1953 ([M + H]+, calcd for C17H27O3 279.1955).

4.3.5. Elsinochrome A (5)

Bright red oil. UV (H2O/ACN + 0.1% trifluoric acid (TFA)) λmax: 224, 268, 338, 456, 528, 566 nm. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 16.30 (s, 2H, 4-OH, 11-OH), 6.94 (s, 2H, 6-H, 9-H), 5.19 (s, 2H, 1-H, 2-H), 4.19 (s, 6H, 17-H3, 20-H3), 4.13 (s, 6H, 18-H3, 19-H3), 2.13 (s, 6H, 14-H3, 16-H3); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 204.3, 177.4, 173.3, 167.4, 149.7, 130.1, 122.0, 121.9, 117.3, 106.5, 102.2, 60.8, 57.3, 48.0, 27.9. ESIMS m/z 545.17 [M + H]+, 543.11 [M − H]−.

4.4. Semisynthetic Conversions

Diazomethane (0.4 mmol) in ether (1 mL), which was freshly produced in a Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, Deisenhofen, Germany) Diazomethane Generator according to the manufacturer’s instructions, was added stepwise to 1 (1.0 mg) in aqueous methanol (50%, 1 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction was monitored by analytical HPLC and stopped by removing the solvent in vacuo after all starting material had been converted. This provided the methyl ester of elsinopirin A (6) without further purification.

The methyl esters 7–9 of elsinopirins B–D (2–4) were obtained analogously.

4.4.1. Elsinopirin A Methyl Ester (6)

Colorless oil. UV (H2O/ACN + 0.1% TFA) λmax: 270 nm. 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 7.29 (dd, J = 15.3, 11.0 Hz, 13-H), 6.48 (dd, J = 15.3, 9.7 Hz, 11-H), 6.31 (dd, J = 15.3, 11.0 Hz, 12-H), 5.91 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 14-H), 3.65 (s, OCH3), 2.88 (qd, J = 6.7, 5.5 Hz, 2-H), 2.78 (ddd, J = 10.5, 9.7, 3.9 Hz, 4-H), 2.20 (br dd, J = 12.0, 11.0 Hz, 10-H), 1.99 (m, 3-H), 1.77 (m, 9-Ha), 1.53 (m, 7-Ha), 1.46 (m, 6-H), 1.37 (m, 8-H), 1.31 (ddd, J = 11.0, 10.5, 9.5 Hz, 5-H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 19-H3) *, 0.85 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 18-H3) *, 0.83 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 17-H3), 0.79 (dt, J = 13.8, 12.0 Hz, 9-Hb), 0.67 (dt, J = 13.7, 11.5 Hz, 7-Hb), 0.60 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 16-H3) * these assignments could be interchanged. ESIMS m/z 341.22 [M + Na]+, 319.24 [M + H]+.

4.4.2. Elsinopirin B Methyl Ester (7)

Colorless oil. UV (H2O/ACN + 0.1% TFA) λmax: 271 nm. 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 7.29 (dd, J = 15.3, 10.8 Hz, 13-H), 6.49 (dd, J = 15.3, 9.7 Hz, 11-H), 6.30 (dd, J = 15.3, 10.8 Hz, 12-H), 5.91 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 14-H), 4.44 (br d, J = 6.7 Hz, 7-OH), 3.65 (s, OCH3), 2.88 (qd, J = 6.8, 5.5 Hz, 2-H), 2.81 (ddd, J = 10.5, 9.7, 3.6 Hz, 4-H), 2.38 (m, 7-H), 2.23 (br dd, J = 12.0, 11.0 Hz, 10-H), 1.99 (m, 3-H), 1.75 (dt, J = 13.8, 3.2 Hz, 9-Ha), 1.46 (ddd, J = 11.0, 10.5, 9.5 Hz, 5-H), 1.29 (m, 6-H), 1.24 (m, 8-H), 0.96 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 19-H3), 0.94 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 18-H3), 0.90 (m, 9-Hb), 0.83 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 17-H3), 0.59 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 16-H3). ESIMS m/z 357.22 [M + Na]+, 335.23 [M + H]+, 317.22 [M + H − H2O]+.

4.4.3. Elsinopirin C Methyl Ester (8)

Colorless oil. UV (H2O/ACN + 0.1% TFA) λmax: 271 nm. 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 7.28 (dd, J = 15.3, 10.8 Hz, 13-H), 6.48 (dd, J = 15.3, 9.6 Hz, 11-H), 6.32 (dd, J = 15.3, 10.8 Hz, 12-H), 5.91 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 14-H), 3.65 (s, OCH3), 2.91 (qd, J = 6.5, 5.5 Hz, 2-H), 2.82 (ddd, J = 10.5, 9.6, 3.7 Hz, 4-H), 2.54 (m, 10-H), 1.98 (m, 3-H), 1.80 (m, 6-H), 1.68 (dt, J = 13.8, 2.5, 9-Ha), 1.43 (dt, J = 13.7, 3.2 Hz, 7-Ha), 1.31 (ddd, J = 11.0, 10.5, 9.8 Hz, 5-H), 1.15 (dd, J = 13.8, 12.2 Hz, 9-Hb), 1.09 (s, 18-H3), 1.43 (dd, J = 13.7, 12.2 Hz, 7-Hb), 0.83 (m, 19-H3) *, 0.82 (m, 17-H3) *, 0.83 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 18-H3), 0.59 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 16-H3), * these assignments could be interchanged. ESIMS m/z 357.21 [M + Na]+, 317.22 [M + H − H2O]+.

4.4.4. Elsinopirin D Methyl Ester (9)

Colorless oil. UV (H2O/ACN + 0.1% TFA) λmax: 225 nm. 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 7.05 (dd, J = 15.7, 9.8 Hz, 11-H), 5.95 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 12-H), 3.65 (s, OCH3), 2.86–2.92 (m, 2-H, 4-H), 2.20 (br dd, J = 12.0, 11.0 Hz, 10-H), 2.02 (qdd, J = 7.1, 5.5, 4.0 Hz, 3-H), 1.76 (m, 9-Ha), 1.53 (m, 7-Ha), 1.46 (m, 6-H), 1.39 (ddd, J = 11.0, 10.5, 9.5 Hz, 5-H), 1.37 (m, 8-H), 0.85 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 19-H3) *, 0.84 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 18-H3) *, 0.83 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 17-H3) *, 0.80 (dt, J = 13.8, 12.0 Hz, 9-Hb), 0.67 (dt, J = 13.4, 12.0 Hz, 7-Hb), 0.58 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 16-H3) * these assignments could be interchanged. ESIMS m/z 315.20 [M + Na]+, 261.17 [M + H − H2O]+.

4.5. Mosher’s Analyses

For the preparation of the (S)-MTPA ester, 0.8 mg of 2 was dissolved in 600 µL of pyridine-d5, and 10 µL of (R)-MTPA chloride was added. The mixture was incubated at 25 °C for 10 min before the measurement of 1H, COSY, TOCSY, HSQC and HMBC NMR spectra: 1H NMR (700 MHz, pyridine-d5): similar to 2, but δH 4.71 (7-H), 2.00 (9-Ha), 1.73 (6-H), 1.57 (8-H), 0.98 (19-H3), 0.82 (18-H3). The (R)-MTPA ester was prepared in the same manner by the addition of 10 µL of (S)-MTPA chloride: 1H NMR (700 MHz, pyridine-d5): similar to 2, but δH 4.69 (7-H), 2.04 (9-Ha), 1.65 (6-H), 1.64 (8-H), 0.96 (18-H3), 0.83 (19-H3).

4.6. Serial Dilution and Cytotoxicity Assay

Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined in a serial dilution assay carried out in a manner similar to that previously described [10]. Various test organisms were used to assess the antibacterial and antifungal activities. The in vitro cytotoxicity assay with the mouse cell line L929 was performed as previously described [10].

5. Conclusions

In summary, we isolated four novel metabolites from E. pyri strain 2203C, and elucidated their structures including absolute stereochemistry. Since no significant bioactivity was detected, their ecological role remains elusive.