| Literature DB >> 29401674 |
Jingyu He1, Jiafeng Li2, Han Liu3, Zichao Yang4, Fenghua Zhou5, Ting Wei6, Yaqian Dong7, Hongjiao Xue8, Lan Tang9, Menghua Liu10.
Abstract
The iridoids of Hedyotis diffusa Willd play an important role in the anti-inflammatory process, but the specific iridoid with anti-inflammatory effect and its mechanism has not be thoroughly studied. An iridoid compound named scandoside (SCA) was isolated from H. diffusa and its anti-inflammatory effect was investigated in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages. Its anti-inflammatory mechanism was confirmed by in intro experiments and molecular docking analyses. As results, SCA significantly decreased the productions of nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and inhibited the levels of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), TNF-α and IL-6 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages. SCA treatment suppressed the phosphorylation of inhibitor of nuclear transcription factor kappa-B alpaha (IκB-α), p38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). The docking data suggested that SCA had great binding abilities to COX-2, iNOS and IκB. Taken together, the results indicated that the anti-inflammatory effect of SCA is due to inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines and mediators via suppressing the nuclear transcription factor kappa-B (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways, which provided useful information for its application and development.Entities:
Keywords: anti-inflammation; mitogen-activated protein kinase; nuclear transcription factor kappa-B alpaha; scandoside
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29401674 PMCID: PMC5855679 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19020457
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Chemical structure of scandoside (SCA).
Figure 2Effect of SCA on the viability of RAW 264.7 macrophages. RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with SCA at the concentrations of 0, 50, 100, 200 and 400 μg/mL, respectively, for 1 h, and then stimulated with 50 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 24 h. RAW 264.7 macrophages were also treated with SCA at the concentration of 400 μg/mL without LPS for 24 h. Cell viability was detected by cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay.
Figure 3Effects of SCA on the productions of NO (A); PGE2 (B); TNF-α (C) and IL-6 (D). RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with SCA at the concentrations of 40, 80 and 160 μg/mL, respectively, for 1 h, and then stimulated with 50 ng/mL LPS for 24 h. The concentrations in the cell-free culture were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 versus LPS-only treatment group; ### p < 0.001 versus control group.
Figure 4Effects of SCA on TNF-α (A) and IL-6 (B) mRNA expressions. RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with SCA (40, 80 and 160 μg/mL) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS (50 ng/mL) for 24 h. The TNF-α and IL-6 mRNA expressions were analyzed by real-time PCR. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 versus LPS-only treatment group; ### p < 0.001 versus control group.
Figure 5Effects of SCA on iNOS and COX-2 mRNA (A and B) and protein expressions (C and D). RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with SCA (40, 80 and 160 μg/mL) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS (50 ng/mL) for 24 h. The iNOS and COX-2 mRNA expressions were analyzed by RT-PCR. The iNOS and COX-2 proteins were analyzed by Western blotting. The bar chart shows the quantitative evaluation of iNOS and COX-2 protein bands by densitometry. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 versus LPS-only treatment group; ### p < 0.001 versus control group.
Figure 6Effect of SCA on IκBα, p38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)phosphorylation. (A) RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with SCA (40, 80 and 160 μg/mL) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS (50 ng/mL) for 24 h. IκBα, p38, ERK1/2 and JNK, alone with their phosphorylated products, were analyzed by Western blotting. β-actin was used as the internal control for the lysate and cytosolic fraction. p-IκBα, p-p38, p-ERK1/2 and p-JNK were normalized with IκBα, p38, ERK1/2 and JNK, respectively; (B) The bar chart shows the quantitative evaluation of protein bands by densitometry * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 versus LPS-only treatment group; ### p < 0.001 versus control group.
Figure 7The best docked pose of SCA with target proteins. Docked orientation of SCA (colored in green) with corresponding secondary protein structure (colored in yellow) and amino acid residues (colored in blue) of COX-2 (1CX2) (A); iNOS (4NOS) (B); PEG2 (4AL0) (C) and IκB (1NFI) (D).
Virtual binding score values and interaction between the ligand and amino acid residues in scandoside protein–ligand complexes.
| Target Protein | Total Score 1 | Crash 2 | Polar 3 | Hydrogen Bonds | Eletrostatic Interaction | Hydrophobic Interaction (0.5 Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COX-2(1CX2) | 9.0084 | −3.0357 | 2.9740 | His90, Tyr355(3), Tyr385, Ser530 | His90, Arg513 | His90, Val349, Leu352, Ser353, Tyr355, Phe381, Leu384, Tyr385, Trp387, Phe518, Met522, Val523, Gly526, Ala527, Ser530, Leu531 |
| iNOS(4NOS) | 9.2757 | −1.4618 | 7.6190 | Trp295, Lys296, Asp303, Glu320, Ile321, Glu328, Lys345 | Lys296 | Trp295, Lys296, Lys298, Phe302, Asp303, Val304, Glu320, Ile321, Pro323, Val326, Glu328, Lys345 |
| PEG2(4AL0) | 6.2647 | −1.2700 | 5.0136 | Ala31, Arg38(2), Ala45, Asn46, His72 | Ala31, Thr34, Arg38, Ala45, Asn46, Leu69, His72 | |
| IκB(1NFI) | 9.0953 | −0.6933 | 9.9542 | Arg73(2), a Arg95, Arg96(2), Glu101, Asn137(2), Gln162, Thr164(2) | a Arg95 | Arg73, a Arg95, Arg96, Phe99, Glu101, Thr136, Asn137, Asn138, Gln162, Thr164 |
1 Total score: total docking score expressed in –log (Kd) units to represent binding affinities. 2 Crash: the degree of inappropriate penetration by the ligand into the protein and of interpenetration between ligand atoms that are separated by rotatable bonds. 3 Polar: the effect of polar non-hydrogen bonding interaction to the total score. The number behind some residues stands for the number of hydrogen bond between the residue and the ligand. a Residues located in E subunit of IκB (1NFI) and other residues locate in A subunit.
The primers used for RT-PCR analysis.
| Cytokines | Sense Primer Sequence5’-3 | Antisense Primer Sequence5’-3 |
|---|---|---|
| TNF-α | GCGACGTGGAACTGGCAGAA | CAGTAGACAGAAGAGCGTGGTG |
| IL-6 | GTTGCCTTCTTGGGACTGAT | CATTTCCACGATTTCCCAGA |
| iNOS | TGGAGCGAGTTGTGGATTGT | CTCTGCCTATCCGTCTCGTC |
| COX-2 | ACCTGGTGAACTACGACTGC | TGGTCGGTTTGATGTTACTG |
| β-actin | TGCTGTCCCTGTATGCCTCTG | GCTGTAGCCACGCTCGGTCA |