| Literature DB >> 29401654 |
Sebastien Giraud1,2,3, Raphael Thuillier4,5,6,7, Ricardo Codas8,9,10, Emily Manguy11, Benoit Barrou12,13,14, Alexandre Valagier15, Alexis Puichaud16, Lionel Badet17,18,19, Emmanuelle Nicolas20, Michel Eugene21, Thierry Hauet22,23,24,25,26,27.
Abstract
University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is not optimal for preservation of marginal organs. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) could improve protection. Similarly formulated solutions containing either 15 or 20 g/L PEG 20 kDa or 5, 15 and 30 g/L PEG 35 kDa were tested in vitro on kidney endothelial cells, ex vivo on preserved kidneys, and in vivo in a pig kidney autograft model. In vitro, all PEGs provided superior preservation than UW in terms of cell survival, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production, and activation of survival pathways. Ex vivo, tissue injury was lower with PEG 20 kDa compared to UW or PEG 35 kDa. In vivo, function recovery was identical between UW and PEG 35 kDa groups, while PEG 20 kDa displayed swifter recovery. At three months, PEG 35 kDa 15 and 30 g/L animals had worse outcomes than UW, while 5 g/L PEG 35 kDa was similar. PEG 20 kDa was superior to both UW and PEG 35 kDa in terms of function and fibrosis development, with low activation of damage pathways. PEG 20 kDa at 15 g/L was superior to 20 g/L. While in vitro models did not discriminate between PEGs, in large animal models of transplantation we showed that PEG 20 kDa offers a higher level of protection than UW and that longer chains such as PEG 35 kDa must be used at low doses, such as found in Institut George Lopez (IGL1, 1g/L).Entities:
Keywords: PEG; graft preservation; ischemia reperfusion injury; kidney transplantation; polyethylene glycol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29401654 PMCID: PMC5855676 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19020454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1In vitro evaluation of endothelial cell resistance to ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI). Primary porcine endothelial cells underwent 6 h (A,C,E,G,I) or 20 h (B,D,F,H,J) hypoxia in University of Wisconsin (UW) or polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions. (A,B) Cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content expressed as percentage of ATP in control cells (no hypoxia); (C,D) Cell death determined by calculating the ratio between extracellular over intracellular Lactate DesHydrogenase (LDH); (E,F) Mitochondrial Succinate Deshydrogenase activity assessment by 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT) assay, expressed as percentage of viability in Control cells (no hypoxia); (G,H,I,J): RTqPCR evaluation, mRNA expression is calculated as folds to control cells. Control are cells incubated in regular medium for 48 h. Shown are mean + SEM. Statistics: * p < 0.05 versus Control; ‡ p < 0.05 to UW. n = 3.
Figure 2Reverse Transcription quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTqPCR) on preserved kidneys. Porcine kidneys underwent 6h (A,B) or 24h (C,D) preservation in UW or PEG solutions. Messenger RNA (mRNA) expression is calculated as fold over control cells, incubated in regular medium for 48 h. Shown are mean + SEM. Statistics: ‡ p < 0.05 to UW; † p < 0.05 to PEG 20 kDa/15 g; t¶ p < 0.05 o PEG 20 kDa/20 g. n = 3.
Figure 3Histological Evaluation of Preserved Kidneys. (A–F) Representative Histology of preserved kidneys after 24 h preservation. Kidneys were preserved in the indicated solution for 24 h before processing for histological evaluation. Magnification: 200×; (G) Evaluation and scoring of histological lesions development during kidney preservation. Histological scoring was done according to the following grades: 0—no abnormality; 1—less than 10%; 2—10–25%; 3—26–50%; 4—51–75%; 5—more than 75%. Statistics: * p < 0.05 vs. UW, ‡ p < 0.05 vs. PEG 20 kDa, ¶ p < 0.05 vs. UW et PEG 20 kDa. n = 3.
Figure 4Function Recovery post-Reperfusion. Serum creatinine was measured in pigs transplanted with kidneys preserved in UW or PEG-containing solutions. (A) Groups UW, PEG 20kDa/15 g and PEG 20 kDa/20 g; (B) Groups UW, PEG 35 kDa/5 g, PEG 35 kDa/15 g and PEG 35 kDa/30 g. Shown are mean + SEM. Statistics: ‡ p < 0.05 to UW. n = 3.
Figure 5Long Term Outcome. (A) Kaplan-Meier curve of animal survival over a period of 3 months; (B) Serum creatinine (µmol/L); (C) Proteinuria (g/24 h); (D) Representative images of Sirius Red staining on tissue sections from the different groups (Magnification: 100×); (E): graphical representation of the amount of fibrosis as % of Red Sirius Staining; (F–I) RTqPCR on kidneys at three months. Results are expressed as folds to level of expression in Controls. Shown are mean + SEM. Statistics: ‡ p < 0.05 to UW, ¶ p < 0.05 to PEG 20 kDa/20 g/L and † p < 0.05 to PEG 20 kDa/15g/L. n = 3.
Physical properties of the different preservation solutions.
| Solution | PEG Concentration (mM) | Density (g/cm3) | Viscosity (Cst) |
|---|---|---|---|
| UW | 0 | 1.047 | 3.22 |
| PEG 20kDa/15 g | 0.75 | 1.010 | 1.41 |
| PEG 20 kDa/20 g | 1 | 1.011 | 1.55 |
| PEG 35kDa/5 g | 0.14 | 1.008 | 1.23 |
| PEG 35 kDa/15 g | 0.43 | 1.010 | 1.90 |
| PEG 35 kDa/30 g | 0.85 | 1.032 | 4.56 |