| Literature DB >> 29401014 |
Mary Nix1, Peggy McNamara2, Janice Genevro3, Natalia Vargas4, Kamila Mistry5, Alaina Fournier6, Margie Shofer7, Edwin Lomotan8, Therese Miller9, Richard Ricciardi10, Arlene S Bierman11.
Abstract
Learning collaboratives are increasingly used as mechanisms to support and hasten the diffusion and implementation of innovation, clinical evidence, and effective models of care. Factors contributing to the collaboratives' success or failure are poorly understood. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has sponsored collaboratives for nearly two decades to support improvements in health care quality and value by accelerating the diffusion and implementation of innovation. We examined AHRQ's experience with these collaboratives to characterize their attributes, identify factors that might contribute to their success or failure, and assess the challenges they encountered. Building on the literature and insights from AHRQ's experience, we propose a taxonomy that can offer guidance to decision makers and funders about the factors they should consider in developing collaboratives and planning their evaluation, as well as to researchers who seek to conduct research that will ultimately help decision makers make better investments in diffusing innovation and evidence.Keywords: Community of Practice; Diffusion; Learning Collaborative; Learning Network; Quality Of Care
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29401014 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) ISSN: 0278-2715 Impact factor: 6.301