| Literature DB >> 29399280 |
Sophie Restellini1, Nicolas Goossens1, Sophie Clément2, Nicolas Lanthier3, Francesco Negro1, Laura Rubbia-Brandt2, Laurent Spahr1.
Abstract
AIM: To explore the relationship between collagen proportionate area (CPA) and portal hypertension-related clinical manifestations in alcoholic liver disease (ALD).Entities:
Keywords: Chronic advanced liver disease; Cirrhosis; Collagen proportionate area; Fibrosis; Hepatic venous pressure gradient
Year: 2018 PMID: 29399280 PMCID: PMC5787686 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i1.73
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Hepatol
Figure 1Variability of histological specimens in HE (top) and PicroSirius red (bottom) stained transjugular biopsy specimens. A: Non-cirrhotic sample with 0.01% fibrosis proportion; B: Cirrhotic sample with 21% of fibrosis proportion.
Patients characteristics
| Age (yr) | 38.2 (35-49) | 59.5 (55-65) | 56.9 (52-63) | 0.40 |
| Male sex | 6 (67%) | 16 (80%) | 33 (80%) | 1.0 |
| Ascites | 0 | 11 (61%) | 23 (64%) | 1.0 |
| HE | 0 | 3 (16%) | 7 (21%) | 1.0 |
| Esophageal varices | 0 | 15 (83%) | 25 (69%) | 0.30 |
| HVPG (mmHg) | 2 (2-3) | 18 (16-19) | 18 (14-20) | 0.90 |
| Liver stiffness (kPa) | 3.8 (3-3.8) | Not available | 38.6 (14.6-68.2) | - |
| Platelet count (G/L) | 286 (170-340) | 44.5 (20-55) | 33.5 (20-53) | 0.40 |
| Child-Pugh score | - | 9.5 (8-10) | 9 (8-11) | 0.94 |
| MELD score | - | 14 (12-19) | 19 (11-22) | 0.50 |
HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease.
Histological features on transjugular liver biopsy
| Cirrhosis | 0 (9%) | 20 (100%) | 41 (100%) | 1.0 |
| Marked steatosis | 0 (0%) | 1 (5%) | 21 (51%) | 0.001 |
| Marked ballooned hepatocytes | 0 (0%) | 5 (26%) | 25 (64%) | 0.01 |
| Marked inflammation | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2%) | 0.9 |
| Fibrosis density (%) | 0.7 (0.2-1.5) | 3.8 (1.1-11.8) | 8.2 (3.8-14.1) | 0.17 |
| Fibrosis category | 0.48 | |||
| 0%-5% | 9 | 11 | 15 | |
| 5%-10% | 0 | 3 | 9 | |
| 10%-20% | 0 | 3 | 12 | |
| > 20% | 0 | 3 | 5 |
Characteristics of patients with alcoholic liver disease according to fibrosis density
| Active alcohol | 15 (58%) | 26 (74%) | 0.27 |
| Age (yr) | 58 (55-64) | 57 (52-63) | 0.4 |
| Male sex | 24 (92%) | 25 (71%) | 0.06 |
| Ascites | 12 (55%) | 22 (69%) | 0.4 |
| HE | 7 (32%) | 3 (10%) | 0.07 |
| Esophageal varices | 15 (65%) | 25 (81%) | 0.2 |
| HVPG (mmHg) | 16 (11-18) | 19 (17-20) | 0.01 |
| Liver stiffness (kPa) | 19 (12-42) | 57 (34-72) | 0.5 |
| Platelet count (G/L) | 37 (20-52) | 38 (20-55) | 0.7 |
| MELD score | 14 (11-19) | 18 (13-22) | 0.2 |
| Histology | |||
| Marked steatosis | 11 (42%) | 11 (31%) | 0.4 |
| Marked ballooned hepatocytes | 9 (36%) | 21 (64%) | 0.06 |
| Marked inflammation | 0 (0%) | 1 (3%) | 0.9 |
HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease.
Figure 2Correlation between hepatic venous pressure gradient and fibrosis density measured by collagen proportionate area. A: Correlation between HVPG and fibrosis density measured by CPA in the whole group of patients; B: Subgroup analysis showing a positive correlation between CPA and HVPG restricted to active alcohol drinkers. HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient; CPA: Collagen proportionate area.
Figure 3Relationship between hepatic venous pressure gradient (A), collagen proportionate area (B) and development of clinical complications related to portal hypertension during follow-up both in active alcohol drinkers (C) and abstinent patients (D).