| Literature DB >> 29399076 |
Jinfeng Sun1,2,3, Bin Wang1,2,4, Youjuan Hao3, Xueli Yang3.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of calcium dobesilate on Nrf2, Keap1 and HO-1 in the lenses of D-galactose-induced cataracts in rats. Thirty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups: a blank control group, a model control group and a model administration group. A normal diet was given to the rats in the blank control group and the rats with D-galactose-induced cataracts of the model control group. Calcium dobesilate was also given to the rats with D-galactose-induced cataracts of the model administration group. A slit lamp microscope was used to check the degree of lens opacity. RT-PCR and western blot analysis were used to detect the mRNA and protein expression of Nrf2, Keap1 and HO-1 in the lenses of the three groups. There was a significant difference in the degree of lens opacity among the three groups (P<0.05). The model control group was the most turbid of the three groups, followed by the model administration group. Moreover, the mRNA and protein expression of Nrf2, Keap1 and HO-1 in the lenses of the three groups were also significantly different (P<0.05). The mRNA levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were the highest in the model control group, followed by the model administration group, and were the lowest in the blank control group. However, the mRNA expression level of Keap1 among the three groups had an opposite trend. In conclusion, calcium dobesilate can effectively increase the levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 in the lenses of diabetic cataract rats and inhibit the level of Keap1. Therefore, the therapeutic effect of calcium dobesilate against cataracts is related to the improvement of the Nrf2-Keap1 signaling pathway.Entities:
Keywords: HO-1; Keap1; Nrf2; calcium dobesilate; cataract
Year: 2017 PMID: 29399076 PMCID: PMC5772489 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.5435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Comparison of the opacity of lens samples between the 3 groups (n=60).
| Groups | No. of eyes | 0 | I | II | III | IV | V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank control | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Model control | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 14 |
| Model administration | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 4 |
| F-value | 23.870[ | ||||||
| P-value | <0.001 |
Rank sum test results indicate a statistically significant difference in ranking between the groups.
Comparison of expression of Nrf2, Keap1 and HO-1 mRNA in lens samples among the 3 groups (n=30).
| Groups | n | Nrf2 | Keap1 | HO-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank control | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Model control | 10 | 0.36±0.25 | 0.26±0.17 | 0.41±0.15 |
| Model administration | 10 | 0.79±0.23 | 0.68±0.13 | 0.87±0.09 |
| F-value | 10.808[ | 13.415[ | 12.874[ | |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
F-test results indicate a statistically significant difference between the groups.
Figure 1.Expression of Keap1, Nrf2 and HO-1 protein in lens samples. Images show the relative expression levels of each protein from lens samples between the three groups (blank control, model control and model administration) as detected by western blot analysis.
Comparison of expression of Nrf2, Keap1 and HO-1 protein in lens samples among the blank control and model administration groups (n=20).
| Groups | n | Nrf2 | Keap1 | HO-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank control | 10 | 0.79±0.13 | 1.46±0.17 | 0.27±0.04 |
| Model administration | 10 | 0.43±0.06 | 1.94±0.14 | 0.12±0.03 |
| F-value | 15.325[ | 17.436[ | 16.301[ | |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
F-test results indicate a statistically significant difference between the groups.