Literature DB >> 29398265

Predicting Oncologic Outcomes in Renal Cell Carcinoma After Surgery.

Bradley C Leibovich1, Christine M Lohse2, John C Cheville3, Harras B Zaid4, Stephen A Boorjian4, Igor Frank4, R Houston Thompson4, William P Parker4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predicting oncologic outcomes is important for patient counseling, clinical trial design, and biomarker study testing.
OBJECTIVE: To develop prognostic models for progression-free (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), papillary RCC (papRCC), and chromophobe RCC (chrRCC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort review of the Mayo Clinic Nephrectomy registry from 1980 to 2010, for patients with nonmetastatic ccRCC, papRCC, and chrRCC. INTERVENTION: Partial or radical nephrectomy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: PFS and CSS from date of surgery. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to develop parsimonious models based on clinicopathologic features to predict oncologic outcomes and were evaluated with c-indexes. Models were converted into risk scores/groupings and used to predict PFS and CSS rates after accounting for competing risks. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 3633 patients were identified, of whom 2726 (75%) had ccRCC, 607 (17%) had papRCC, and 222 (6%) had chrRCC. Models were generated for each histologic subtype and a risk score/grouping was developed for each subtype and outcome (PFS/CSS). For PFS, the c-indexes were 0.83, 0.77, and 0.78 for ccRCC, papRCC, and chrRCC, respectively. For CSS, c-indexes were 0.86 and 0.83 for ccRCC and papRCC. Due to only 22 deaths from RCC, we did not assess a multivariable model for chrRCC. Limitations include the single institution study, lack of external validation, and its retrospective nature.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a large institutional experience, we generated specific prognostic models for oncologic outcomes in ccRCC, papRCC, and chrRCC that rely on features previously shown-and validated-to be associated with survival. These updated models should inform patient prognosis, biomarker design, and clinical trial enrollment. PATIENT
SUMMARY: We identified routinely available clinical and pathologic features that can accurately predict progression and death from renal cell carcinoma following surgery. These updated models should inform patient prognosis, biomarker design, and clinical trial enrollment.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prediction models; Prognosis; Renal cell carcinoma; Surgery; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29398265     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  34 in total

1.  Angiogenic Factor and Cytokine Analysis among Patients Treated with Adjuvant VEGFR TKIs in Resected Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wenxin Xu; Maneka Puligandla; Judith Manola; Andrea J Bullock; Daniel Tamasauskas; David F McDermott; Michael B Atkins; Naomi B Haas; Keith Flaherty; Robert G Uzzo; Janice P Dutcher; Robert S DiPaola; Rupal S Bhatt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Metastatic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: Presence or Absence of Sarcomatoid Differentiation Determines Clinical Course and Treatment Outcomes.

Authors:  Yasser Ged; Ying-Bei Chen; Andrea Knezevic; Jozefina Casuscelli; Almedina Redzematovic; Renzo G DiNatale; Maria I Carlo; Chung-Han Lee; Darren R Feldman; Sujata Patil; A Ari Hakimi; Paul Russo; Robert J Motzer; Martin H Voss
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Associations between tumor grade, contrast-enhanced ultrasound features, and microvascular density in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Xia Meng; Ran Yang; Shengnan Zhao; Zhixia Sun; Hui Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

4.  Performance of CT radiomics in predicting the overall survival of patients with stage III clear cell renal carcinoma after radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Dong Han; Nan Yu; Yong Yu; Taiping He; Xiaoyi Duan
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.313

Review 5.  Adjuvant Therapy Options in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Nieves Martinez Chanza; Abhishek Tripathi; Lauren C Harshman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-05-03

6.  MicroRNA‑21 contributes to renal cell carcinoma cell invasiveness and angiogenesis via the PDCD4/c‑Jun (AP‑1) signalling pathway.

Authors:  Bo Fan; Yiying Jin; Hongshuo Zhang; Rui Zhao; Man Sun; Mengfan Sun; Xiaoying Yuan; Wei Wang; Xiaogang Wang; Zhiqi Chen; Wankai Liu; Na Yu; Qun Wang; Tingjiao Liu; Xiancheng Li
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 7.  Prognostic factors and prognostic models for renal cell carcinoma: a literature review.

Authors:  Tobias Klatte; Sabrina H Rossi; Grant D Stewart
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Pattern, timing and predictors of recurrence after surgical resection of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Joana B Neves; Leyre Vanaclocha Saiz; Saeed Dabestani; Maxine G B Tran; Axel Bex; Yasmin Abu-Ghanem; Marta Marchetti; My-Anh Tran-Dang; Soha El-Sheikh; Ravi Barod; Christian Beisland; Umberto Capitanio; David Cullen; Tobias Klatte; Börje Ljungberg; Faiz Mumtaz; Prasad Patki; Grant D Stewart
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  The first competing risk survival nomogram in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xing Su; Niu-Niu Hou; Li-Jun Yang; Peng-Xiao Li; Xiao-Jian Yang; Guang-Dong Hou; Xue-Lin Gao; Shuai-Jun Ma; Fan Guo; Rui Zhang; Wu-He Zhang; Wei-Jun Qin; Fu-Li Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Prospective performance of clear cell likelihood scores (ccLS) in renal masses evaluated with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ryan L Steinberg; Robert G Rasmussen; Brett A Johnson; Rashed Ghandour; Alberto Diaz De Leon; Yin Xi; Takeshi Yokoo; Sandy Kim; Payal Kapur; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.