Literature DB >> 35284253

Associations between tumor grade, contrast-enhanced ultrasound features, and microvascular density in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Xia Meng1, Ran Yang1, Shengnan Zhao1, Zhixia Sun1, Hui Wang1.   

Abstract

Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) comprises 70% of all renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Currently, the most important prognostic factor for this type of carcinoma is the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grade. However, nonsurgical methods are rarely used to determine a tumor's WHO/ISUP grade, thus limiting the development of nonsurgical therapies. Due to variations in microvascular density (MVD) at different stages of tumor growth, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features may provide a noninvasive method for evaluating the WHO/ISUP grade of ccRCC.
Methods: In this study, we analyzed confirmed cases of ccRCC using CEUS features. We also used CD34 and CD31 antibodies to determine MVD. The heterogeneity of CD34 and CD31 expressions were used to determine different degrees of angiogenesis.
Results: When compared to WHO/ISUP grade I/II (G1/G2) tumors, grade III/IV (G3/G4) tumors had reduced peak intensity (PI) (P=0.006), time to peak (TTP) (P<0.001), and relative enhancement percentage index (∆PI%) (P<0.001). However, the frequency of incomplete pseudocapsule (P=0.049) and slow wash-in (P=0.001) was significantly higher in G3/G4 tumors. A cut-off value of ∆PI% <33.15% (P<0.001) allowed identification of G3/G4 tumors with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70 to 0.91) and a sensitivity of 80%. The mean CD34+ MVD (P<0.001) and CD31+ MVD (P<0.001) were significantly lower in G3/G4 tumors. A positive correlation was revealed between ∆PI% and MVD. There was a statistically significant difference in the density of undifferentiated vessels between the slow wash-in and fast wash-in cases (P<0.001). Conclusions: The features of CEUS are effective for differentiating G3/G4 tumors from G1/G2. There was a positive correlation detected between ∆PI% and MVD, and the density of undifferentiated vessels showed a significant difference between slow wash-in and fast wash-in cases. These findings indicate that CEUS can enable the sonographic visualization of tumor angiogenesis and thus be considered an acceptable method for the nonsurgical assessment of tumor microvascular distribution and grade. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC); contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); microvascular density (MVD)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35284253      PMCID: PMC8899968          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  30 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of antiangiogenic therapy: microvessel density, what it does and doesn't tell us.

Authors:  Lynn Hlatky; Philip Hahnfeldt; Judah Folkman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Combination Therapy as First-Line Treatment in Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bernard Escudier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Molecular regulation and role of angiogenesis in reproduction.

Authors:  Momchil Rizov; Petya Andreeva; Ivanka Dimova
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.705

4.  Microvascular density, macrophages, and mast cells in human clear cell renal carcinoma with and without bevacizumab treatment.

Authors:  Roberto Tamma; Monica Rutigliano; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Tiziana Annese; Simona Ruggieri; Eliano Cascardi; Anna Napoli; Michele Battaglia; Domenico Ribatti
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 5.  Quantitative assessment of solid renal masses by contrast-enhanced ultrasound with time-intensity curves: how we do it.

Authors:  Kevin G King; Mittul Gulati; Harshawn Malhi; Darryl Hwang; Inderbir S Gill; Phillip M Cheng; Edward G Grant; Vinay A Duddalwar
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10

6.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography with Quantitative Analysis allows Differentiation of Renal Tumor Histotypes.

Authors:  Di Sun; Cong Wei; Yi Li; Qijie Lu; Wei Zhang; Bing Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Prognostic role of microvessel density in patients with glioma.

Authors:  Chaofeng Fan; Jing Zhang; Zhiyong Liu; Min He; Tianyi Kang; Ting Du; Yanlin Song; Yimeng Fan; Jianguo Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Comparison of Different Machine Models Based on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Radiomic Features to Differentiate High From Low Grade Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas.

Authors:  Xu Pei; Ping Wang; Jia-Liang Ren; Xiao-Ping Yin; Lu-Yao Ma; Yun Wang; Xi Ma; Bu-Lang Gao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Renal Cell Tumors: Understanding Their Molecular Pathological Epidemiology and the 2016 WHO Classification.

Authors:  Kentaro Inamura
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings of adult renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion: comparison with clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Shuping Wei; Fuli Tian; Qiuyuan Xia; Pengfei Huang; Yidan Zhang; Zhichao Xia; Min Wu; Bin Yang
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.