Literature DB >> 29397552

A New Method for a Virtue-Based Responsible Conduct of Research Curriculum: Pilot Test Results.

Eric Berling1, Chet McLeskey2, Michael O'Rourke2,3, Robert T Pennock4.   

Abstract

Drawing on Pennock's theory of scientific virtues, we are developing an alternative curriculum for training scientists in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) that emphasizes internal values rather than externally imposed rules. This approach focuses on the virtuous characteristics of scientists that lead to responsible and exemplary behavior. We have been pilot-testing one element of such a virtue-based approach to RCR training by conducting dialogue sessions, modeled upon the approach developed by Toolbox Dialogue Initiative, that focus on a specific virtue, e.g., curiosity and objectivity. During these structured discussions, small groups of scientists explore the roles they think the focus virtue plays and should play in the practice of science. Preliminary results have shown that participants strongly prefer this virtue-based model over traditional methods of RCR training. While we cannot yet definitively say that participation in these RCR sessions contributes to responsible conduct, these pilot results are encouraging and warrant continued development of this virtue-based approach to RCR training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RCR training; Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research; Science ethics; Scientific integrity; Scientific misconduct; Scientific virtues; Toolbox Dialogue Initiative

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29397552     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9991-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  12 in total

1.  Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: a survey of graduate students in experimental sciences.

Authors:  Sarah Brown; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Is compliance a professional virtue of researchers? Reflections on promoting the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  James M DuBois
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2004

3.  Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research.

Authors:  Raymond de Vries; Melissa S Anderson; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education.

Authors:  Hyemin Han
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.

Authors:  Scott Freeman; Sarah L Eddy; Miles McDonough; Michelle K Smith; Nnadozie Okoroafor; Hannah Jordt; Mary Pat Wenderoth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Research as Profession and Practice: Frameworks for Guiding the Responsible Conduct of Research.

Authors:  Jiin-Yu Chen
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Jeffrey M Dueker
Journal:  J Res Adm       Date:  2009

8.  Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Xiaoqian Wang; Michael D Mumford; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of 'Scientific Integrity'.

Authors:  S P J M Horbach; W Halffman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Developing a Scientific Virtue-Based Approach to Science Ethics Training.

Authors:  Robert T Pennock; Michael O'Rourke
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ethical decision-making in biopharmaceutical research and development: applying values using the TRIP & TIPP model.

Authors:  Tatjana Poplazarova; Claar van der Zee; Thomas Breuer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Daniel Pizzolato; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.