| Literature DB >> 29397038 |
A Wey1, S K Gustafson1, N Salkowski1, J Pyke1, B L Kasiske1,2, A K Israni1,2,3, J J Snyder1,3.
Abstract
The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) is considering more prominent reporting of program-specific adjusted transplant rate ratios (TRRs). To enable more useful reporting of TRRs, SRTR updated the transplant rate models to adjust explicitly for components of allocation priority. We evaluated potential associations between TRRs and components of allocation priority that could indicate programs' ability to manipulate TRRs by denying or delaying access to low-priority candidates. Despite a strong association with unadjusted TRRs, we found no candidate-level association between the components of allocation priority and adjusted TRRs. We found a strong program-level association between median laboratory Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at listing and program-specific adjusted TRRs (r = .37; P < .001). The program-level association was likely confounded by regional differences in donor supply/demand and listing practices. In kidney transplantation, higher program-specific adjusted TRRs were weakly associated with better adjusted posttransplant outcomes (r = -.14; P = .035) and lower adjusted waitlist mortality rate ratios (r = -.15; P = .022), but these associations were absent in liver, lung, and heart transplantation. Program-specific adjusted TRRs were unlikely to be improved by listing candidates with high allocation priority and can provide useful information for transplant candidates and programs. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.Entities:
Keywords: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN); Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR); health services and outcomes research; organ procurement and allocation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29397038 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14684
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086