Literature DB >> 29397038

Program-specific transplant rate ratios: Association with allocation priority at listing and posttransplant outcomes.

A Wey1, S K Gustafson1, N Salkowski1, J Pyke1, B L Kasiske1,2, A K Israni1,2,3, J J Snyder1,3.   

Abstract

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) is considering more prominent reporting of program-specific adjusted transplant rate ratios (TRRs). To enable more useful reporting of TRRs, SRTR updated the transplant rate models to adjust explicitly for components of allocation priority. We evaluated potential associations between TRRs and components of allocation priority that could indicate programs' ability to manipulate TRRs by denying or delaying access to low-priority candidates. Despite a strong association with unadjusted TRRs, we found no candidate-level association between the components of allocation priority and adjusted TRRs. We found a strong program-level association between median laboratory Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at listing and program-specific adjusted TRRs (r = .37; P < .001). The program-level association was likely confounded by regional differences in donor supply/demand and listing practices. In kidney transplantation, higher program-specific adjusted TRRs were weakly associated with better adjusted posttransplant outcomes (r = -.14; P = .035) and lower adjusted waitlist mortality rate ratios (r = -.15; P = .022), but these associations were absent in liver, lung, and heart transplantation. Program-specific adjusted TRRs were unlikely to be improved by listing candidates with high allocation priority and can provide useful information for transplant candidates and programs. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN); Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR); health services and outcomes research; organ procurement and allocation

Year:  2018        PMID: 29397038     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  9 in total

1.  Geographic Disparity in Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Rates Following Share 35.

Authors:  Mary G Bowring; Sheng Zhou; Eric K H Chow; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Association of pretransplant and posttransplant program ratings with candidate mortality after listing.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Sally K Gustafson; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Melissa Skeans; Cory R Schaffhausen; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Patients prioritize waitlist over posttransplant outcomes when evaluating kidney transplant centers.

Authors:  Syed Ali Husain; Corey Brennan; Ariane Michelson; Demetra Tsapepas; Rachel E Patzer; Jesse D Schold; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Heart and lung organ offer acceptance practices of transplant programs are associated with waitlist mortality and organ yield.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Maryam Valapour; Melissa A Skeans; Nicholas Salkowski; Monica Colvin; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  The importance of transplant program measures: Surveys of three national patient advocacy groups.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Andrew Wey; Jon J Snyder; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.863

6.  Seeking new answers to old questions about public reporting of transplant program performance in the United States.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; David Zaun; Cory R Schaffhausen; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Comparing Pretransplant and Posttransplant Outcomes When Choosing a Transplant Center: Focus Groups and a Randomized Survey.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Andrew Wey; Warren T McKinney; Jon J Snyder; Jack R Lake; Arthur J Matas; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.385

8.  Textbook Outcome as a Quality Metric in Living and Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Austin D Schenk; April J Logan; Jeffrey M Sneddon; Daria Faulkner; Jing L Han; Guy N Brock; William K Washburn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.532

9.  Mortality among solid organ waitlist candidates during COVID-19 in the United States.

Authors:  Jonathan Miller; Andrew Wey; Donald Musgrove; Yoon Son Ahn; Allyson Hart; Bertram L Kasiske; Ryutaro Hirose; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 9.369

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.