Brantley P Jarvis1, August F Holtyn1, Shrinidhi Subramaniam1, D Andrew Tompkins2, Emmanuel A Oga3, George E Bigelow1, Kenneth Silverman1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Public Health Research and Translational Science, Battelle Memorial Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To review systematically the published literature on extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX, Vivitrol® ), marketed as a once-per-month injection product to treat opioid use disorder. We addressed the following questions: (1) how successful is induction on XR-NTX; (2) what are adherence rates to XR-NTX; and (3) does XR-NTX decrease opioid use? Factors associated with these outcomes as well as overdose rates were examined. METHODS: We searched PubMed and used Google Scholar for forward citation searches of peer-reviewed papers from January 2006 to June 2017. Studies that included individuals seeking treatment for opioid use disorder who were offered XR-NTX were included. RESULTS: We identified and included 34 studies. Pooled estimates showed that XR-NTX induction success was lower in studies that included individuals that required opioid detoxification [62.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 54.5-70.0%] compared with studies that included individuals already detoxified from opioids (85.0%, 95% CI = 78.0-90.1%); 44.2% (95% CI = 33.1-55.9%) of individuals took all scheduled injections of XR-NTX, which were usually six or fewer. Adherence was higher in prospective investigational studies (i.e. studies conducted in a research context according to a study protocol) compared to retrospective studies of medical records taken from routine care (6-month rates: 46.7%, 95% CI = 34.5-59.2% versus 10.5%, 95% CI = 4.6-22.4%, respectively). Compared with referral to treatment, XR-NTX reduced opioid use in adults under criminal justice supervision and when administered to inmates before release. XR-NTX reduced opioid use compared with placebo in Russian adults, but this effect was confounded by differential retention between study groups. XR-NTX showed similar efficacy to buprenorphine when randomization occurred after detoxification, but was inferior to buprenorphine when randomization occurred prior to detoxification. CONCLUSIONS: Many individuals intending to start extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) do not and most who do start XR-NTX discontinue treatment prematurely, two factors that limit its clinical utility significantly. XR-NTX appears to decrease opioid use but there are few experimental demonstrations of this effect.
AIMS: To review systematically the published literature on extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX, Vivitrol® ), marketed as a once-per-month injection product to treat opioid use disorder. We addressed the following questions: (1) how successful is induction on XR-NTX; (2) what are adherence rates to XR-NTX; and (3) does XR-NTX decrease opioid use? Factors associated with these outcomes as well as overdose rates were examined. METHODS: We searched PubMed and used Google Scholar for forward citation searches of peer-reviewed papers from January 2006 to June 2017. Studies that included individuals seeking treatment for opioid use disorder who were offered XR-NTX were included. RESULTS: We identified and included 34 studies. Pooled estimates showed that XR-NTX induction success was lower in studies that included individuals that required opioid detoxification [62.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 54.5-70.0%] compared with studies that included individuals already detoxified from opioids (85.0%, 95% CI = 78.0-90.1%); 44.2% (95% CI = 33.1-55.9%) of individuals took all scheduled injections of XR-NTX, which were usually six or fewer. Adherence was higher in prospective investigational studies (i.e. studies conducted in a research context according to a study protocol) compared to retrospective studies of medical records taken from routine care (6-month rates: 46.7%, 95% CI = 34.5-59.2% versus 10.5%, 95% CI = 4.6-22.4%, respectively). Compared with referral to treatment, XR-NTX reduced opioid use in adults under criminal justice supervision and when administered to inmates before release. XR-NTX reduced opioid use compared with placebo in Russian adults, but this effect was confounded by differential retention between study groups. XR-NTX showed similar efficacy to buprenorphine when randomization occurred after detoxification, but was inferior to buprenorphine when randomization occurred prior to detoxification. CONCLUSIONS: Many individuals intending to start extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) do not and most who do start XR-NTX discontinue treatment prematurely, two factors that limit its clinical utility significantly. XR-NTX appears to decrease opioid use but there are few experimental demonstrations of this effect.
Authors: Shanthi Mogali; Nabil A Khan; Esther S Drill; Martina Pavlicova; Maria A Sullivan; Edward Nunes; Adam Bisaga Journal: Am J Addict Date: 2015-04
Authors: Paolo Mannelli; Li-Tzy Wu; Kathleen S Peindl; Marvin S Swartz; George E Woody Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Evgeny Krupitsky; Edward V Nunes; Walter Ling; Ari Illeperuma; David R Gastfriend; Bernard L Silverman Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-04-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rebekah D Tenney; Steven Blake; Paul T Bremer; Bin Zhou; Candy S Hwang; Justin L Poklis; Kim D Janda; Matthew L Banks Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Lesia M Ruglass; Jennifer Scodes; Martina Pavlicova; Aimee N C Campbell; Skye Fitzpatrick; Celestina Barbosa-Leiker; Kathleen Burlew; Shelly F Greenfield; John Rotrosen; Edward V Nunes Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Arthur Robin Williams; Edward V Nunes; Adam Bisaga; Frances R Levin; Mark Olfson Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: James J Mahoney; Colleen A Hanlon; Patrick J Marshalek; Ali R Rezai; Lothar Krinke Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2020-09-20 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Kathryn L Schwienteck; Steven Blake; Paul T Bremer; Justin L Poklis; E Andrew Townsend; S Stevens Negus; Matthew L Banks Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-08-24 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Brantley P Jarvis; August F Holtyn; Anthony DeFulio; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Annie Umbricht; Michael Fingerhood; George E Bigelow; Kenneth Silverman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Carly Baehr; April Huseby Kelcher; Aaron Khaimraj; Dana E Reed; Sujata G Pandit; David AuCoin; Saadyah Averick; Marco Pravetoni Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2020-09-26 Impact factor: 4.030