Literature DB >> 21529928

Injectable extended-release naltrexone for opioid dependence: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre randomised trial.

Evgeny Krupitsky1, Edward V Nunes, Walter Ling, Ari Illeperuma, David R Gastfriend, Bernard L Silverman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Opioid dependence is associated with low rates of treatment-seeking, poor adherence to treatment, frequent relapse, and major societal consequences. We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of an injectable, once monthly extended-release formulation of the opioid antagonist naltrexone (XR-NTX) for treatment of patients with opioid dependence after detoxification.
METHODS: We did a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, 24-week trial of patients with opioid dependence disorder. Patients aged 18 years or over who had 30 days or less of inpatient detoxification and 7 days or more off all opioids were enrolled at 13 clinical sites in Russia. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to either 380 mg XR-NTX or placebo by an interactive voice response system, stratified by site and gender in a centralised, permuted-block method. Participants also received 12 biweekly counselling sessions. Participants, investigators, staff , and the sponsor were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the response profile for confirmed abstinence during weeks 5–24, assessed by urine drug tests and self report of non-use. Secondary endpoints were self-reported opioid-free days, opioid craving scores, number of days of retention, and relapse to physiological opioid dependence. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00678418.
FINDINGS: Between July 3, 2008, and Oct 5, 2009, 250 patients were randomly assigned to XR-NTX (n=126) or placebo (n=124). The median proportion of weeks of confirmed abstinence was 90·0% (95% CI 69·9–92·4) in the XR-NTX group compared with 35·0% (11·4–63·8) in the placebo group (p=0·0002). Patients in the XR-NTX group self-reported a median of 99·2% (range 89·1–99·4) opioid-free days compared with 60·4% (46·2–94·0) for the placebo group (p=0·0004). The mean change in craving was –10·1 (95% CI –12·3 to –7·8) in the XR-NTX group compared with 0·7 (–3·1 to 4·4) in the placebo group (p<0·0001). Median retention was over 168 days in the XR-NTX group compared with 96 days (95% CI 63–165) in the placebo group (p=0·0042). Naloxone challenge confirmed relapse to physiological opioid dependence in 17 patients in the placebo group compared with one in the XR-NTX group (p<0·0001). XR-NTX was well tolerated. Two patients in each group discontinued owing to adverse events. No XR-NTX-treated patients died, overdosed, or discontinued owing to severe adverse events.
INTERPRETATION: XR-NTX represents a new treatment option that is distinct from opioid agonist maintenance treatment. XR-NTX in conjunction with psychosocial treatment might improve acceptance of opioid dependence pharmacotherapy and provide a useful treatment option for many patients. FUNDING: Alkermes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21529928     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60358-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  187 in total

1.  Maintenance of reinforcement to address the chronic nature of drug addiction.

Authors:  Kenneth Silverman; Anthony DeFulio; Sigurdur O Sigurdsson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Opioid challenge evaluation of blockade by extended-release naltrexone in opioid-abusing adults: dose-effects and time-course.

Authors:  George E Bigelow; Kenzie L Preston; John Schmittner; Qunming Dong; David R Gastfriend
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Opioid detoxification and naltrexone induction strategies: recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Stacey C Sigmon; Adam Bisaga; Edward V Nunes; Patrick G O'Connor; Thomas Kosten; George Woody
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.829

4.  New approaches to dealing with opioid drug dependence.

Authors:  Bruno J Rushforth; Nat M J Wright
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Advances in opioid antagonist treatment for opioid addiction.

Authors:  Walter Ling; Larissa Mooney; Li-Tzy Wu
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2012-04-10

Review 6.  Retention in medication-assisted treatment for opiate dependence: A systematic review.

Authors:  Christine Timko; Nicole R Schultz; Michael A Cucciare; Lisa Vittorio; Christina Garrison-Diehn
Journal:  J Addict Dis       Date:  2015-10-14

7.  Anhedonia, depression, anxiety, and craving in opiate dependent patients stabilized on oral naltrexone or an extended release naltrexone implant.

Authors:  Evgeny Krupitsky; Edwin Zvartau; Elena Blokhina; Elena Verbitskaya; Valentina Wahlgren; Marina Tsoy-Podosenin; Natalia Bushara; Andrey Burakov; Dmitry Masalov; Tatyana Romanova; Arina Tyurina; Vladimir Palatkin; Tatyana Yaroslavtseva; Anna Pecoraro; George Woody
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 8.  Extended-release injectable naltrexone for opioid use disorder: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brantley P Jarvis; August F Holtyn; Shrinidhi Subramaniam; D Andrew Tompkins; Emmanuel A Oga; George E Bigelow; Kenneth Silverman
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Treating opioid dependence with extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) in Ukraine: Feasibility and three-month outcomes.

Authors:  Iuliia Makarenko; Iryna Pykalo; Sandra A Springer; Alyona Mazhnaya; Ruthanne Marcus; Sergii Filippovich; Sergii Dvoriak; Frederick L Altice
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2019-05-10

10.  NIDA Clinical Trials Network CTN-0051, Extended-Release Naltrexone vs. Buprenorphine for Opioid Treatment (X:BOT): Study design and rationale.

Authors:  Joshua D Lee; Edward V Nunes; Patricia Novo Mpa; Genie L Bailey; Gregory S Brigham; Allan J Cohen; Marc Fishman; Walter Ling; Robert Lindblad; Dikla Shmueli-Blumberg; Don Stablein; Jeanine May; Dagmar Salazar; David Liu; John Rotrosen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.