Literature DB >> 29395026

Association of shared decision-making on patient-reported health outcomes and healthcare utilization.

Tasha M Hughes1, Katiuscha Merath1, Qinyu Chen1, Steven Sun1, Elizabeth Palmer1, Jay J Idrees1, Victor Okunrintemi2, Malcolm Squires1, Eliza W Beal1, Timothy M Pawlik3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process that respects the rights of patients to be fully involved in decisions about their care. By evaluating all available healthcare options and weighing patients' personal values and preferences against available unbiased evidence, patients and healthcare professionals can make health-related decisions together, as partners. We sought to evaluate the impact of perceived SDM on patient-reported outcomes, healthcare quality, and healthcare utilization.
METHODS: Patients were identified from the 2010-2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) cohort. The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey was levied to create a weighted composite score of satisfaction with SDM on a 12-point scale, and then categorized as optimal, average or poor SDM based on weighted scores. Weighting and variance techniques were applied to assure results were representative of the U.S. civilian population. Chi-square analysis was used to estimate differences across SDM groupings and multivariate logistic regression was performed to generate odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS: The study cohort included 63,931 responses to the survey tool. Results of SDM satisfaction across the three categories were skewed, with 46.6% (n = 29,807) of the respondents reporting optimal SDM, 42.1% (n = 26,887) reporting average scores and only 11.3% (n = 7237) reporting poor perceived SDM. Non-white race, lower educational level, low socioeconomic status, non-married status, and uninsured or underinsured status were all associated with higher incidence of poor perceived SDM (p < .05). Poor SDM was associated with increased odds of poor physical health scores (OR: 1.17; 95% CI 1.01-1.36) and poor mental health scores (OR: 1.53; 95% CI 1.25-1.86). Poor SDM was associated with lower use of statins (OR: 0.77; 95% CI 0.68-0.87) and aspirin (OR: 0.86; 95% CI 0.77-0.95), both of which are established quality of care metrics. Poor SDM was also associated with increased emergency department (ED) utilization, with an increased likelihood of 2 or more ED visits associated with poor SDM (OR: 1.25; 95% CI 1.06-1.49).
CONCLUSIONS: Poor SDM was associated with worse patient-reported health outcomes, worse established quality indicators, and higher healthcare utilization. While increasing physician education may help optimize SDM, differences in patient-perceived SDM were also strongly driven by inherent patient characteristics.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare outcomes; Hospital utilization; Quality of care; Shared decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29395026     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  33 in total

1.  Identifying subgroups of well-being among patients with cancer: Differences in attitudes and preferences around surveillance after curative-intent surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth Palmer Kelly; J Madison Hyer; Amblessed E Onuma; Anghela Z Paredes; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Empowering Patients during Hospitalization: Perspectives on Inpatient Portal Use.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Naleef Fareed; Alice Gaughan; Sarah R MacEwan; Jaclyn Volney; Cynthia J Sieck
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Impact of Post-Discharge Disposition on Risk and Causes of Readmission Following Liver and Pancreas Surgery.

Authors:  Qinyu Chen; Katiuscha Merath; Griffin Olsen; Fabio Bagante; Jay J Idrees; Ozgur Akgul; Jordan Cloyd; Carl Schmidt; Mary Dillhoff; Eliza W Beal; Susan White; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Association of Income Disparities with Patient-Reported Healthcare Experience.

Authors:  Victor Okunrintemi; Rohan Khera; Erica S Spatz; Joseph A Salami; Javier Valero-Elizondo; Haider J Warraich; Salim S Virani; Ron Blankstein; Michael J Blaha; Timothy M Pawlik; Kumar Dharmarajan; Harlan M Krumholz; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing a Digital Informed Decision Making Tool in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Nicole Puccinelli-Ortega; Mark Cromo; Kristie L Foley; Mark B Dignan; Ajay Dharod; Anna C Snavely; David P Miller
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Disparities in Discussions about Kidney Replacement Therapy in CKD Care.

Authors:  Tyler M Barrett; Clemontina A Davenport; Patti L Ephraim; Sarah Peskoe; Dinushika Mohottige; Nicole DePasquale; Lisa McElroy; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-10-22

7.  Understanding Stakeholder Preference for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Conjoint Analysis.

Authors:  Meghana G Shamsunder; Hina Panchal; Melissa Pilewskie; Clara Lee; Shantanu N Razdan; Evan Matros
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.532

Review 8.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adults With Kidney Disease: Current Measures, Ongoing Initiatives, and Future Opportunities for Incorporation Into Patient-Centered Kidney Care.

Authors:  Devika Nair; F Perry Wilson
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  The Relationship Between Decisional Regret and Well-Being in Patients With and Without Depressive Disorders: Mediating Role of Shared Decision-Making.

Authors:  Richard Huan Xu; Ling-Ming Zhou; Dong Wang
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  How Willing Are Patients or Their Caregivers to Deprescribe: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yee Lin Chock; Yuan Lin Wee; Su Lene Gan; Kah Woon Teoh; Khuen Yen Ng; Shaun Wen Huey Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.