| Literature DB >> 29394899 |
Shyam Sundar Budhathoki1, Meika Bhattachan2, Enrique Castro-Sánchez3, Reshu Agrawal Sagtani4, Rajan Bikram Rayamajhi5, Pramila Rai2, Gaurav Sharma6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) is an essential aspect of hygiene for women and adolescent girls between menarche and menopause. Despite being an important issue concerning women and girls in the menstruating age group MHM is often overlooked in post-disaster responses. Further, there is limited evidence of menstrual hygiene management in humanitarian settings. This study aims to describe the experiences and perceptions of women and adolescent girls on menstrual hygiene management in post-earthquake Nepal.Entities:
Keywords: Menstrual hygiene; Nepal earthquake; Sexual and reproductive health; women’s health
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29394899 PMCID: PMC5797351 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-018-0527-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.809
Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants (n = 117)
| Variables | No (%) |
|---|---|
| Age | |
| 15-24 years | 42 (35.9%) |
| 25-34 years | 40 (34.2%) |
| 35-49 years | 35 (29.9%) |
| Education | |
| No formal schooling | 40 (34.2%) |
| Primary School | 6 (5.1%) |
| Secondary School | 60 (51.3%) |
| University | 11 (9.4%) |
| Marital Status | |
| Unmarried | 33 (28.2%) |
| Married | 84 (71.8%) |
| Adsorbents type used before earthquake | |
| Disposable Pads | 39 (33.3%) |
| Reusable Cloth | 78 (66.7%) |
| Frequency of adsorbent changes/day during menstruation before earthquake | |
| Once | 15 (12.8%) |
| Twice | 54 (46.2%) |
| Thrice or more | 48 (41.0%) |
| Start of menses in relation to earthquake on 25 April 2015 | |
| Menstruating at the time. | 3 (2.6%) |
| In first week, post- earthquake | 47 (40.2%) |
| In second week, post- earthquake | 34 (29.1%) |
| In third week, post- earthquake | 24 (20.5%) |
| In fourth week, post- earthquake | 9 (7.7%) |
Immediate post-earthquake needs as perceived by study respondents
| Variables | No (%) |
|---|---|
| Perceived need* | |
| Food | 114 (97.4%) |
| Shelter | 88 (75.2%) |
| Water (Drinking & Washing) | 74 (63.2%) |
| Clothes | 55 (47.0%) |
| Information about Family Members/relatives | 35 (29.9%) |
| Adsorbents for Menstrual Hygiene | 22 (18.8%) |
| Mobiles | 17 (14.5%) |
| Medicine/First aid | 13 (11.1%) |
| Safe place | 12 (10.3%) |
| Soap | 8 (6.8%) |
| Cattle | 7 (6.0%) |
*Multiple responses
Menstrual Hygiene Management-related responses related to first month post-earthquake (n = 117)
| Variables | |
|---|---|
| Received adsorbents as relief material | |
| Did not receive | 117 (100.0%) |
| Receive soap as relief material | |
| Did not receive | 59 (50.4%) |
| Received as relief material | 58 (49.6%) |
| Privacy available for MHM practice | |
| Not adequately available | 67 (57.3%) |
| Adequately available | 50 (42.7%) |
| Timing to remember adsorbents as a need | |
| On the day of earthquake | 15 (12.8%) |
| Only when menstruation occurred | 102 (87.2%) |
| Type of adsorbents used after the earthquake | |
| Disposable Pads | 28 (23.9%) |
| Reusable Cloth | 89 (76.1%) |
| Source of the adsorbents? (Disposable pads; | |
| Relative or Friend | 12 (42.8%) |
| Bought | 11 (39.3%) |
| Remaining from last time | 5 (17.9%) |
| Source of the adsorbents? (Reusable cloths; | |
| Old clothes | 70 (78.7%) |
| Relative or Friend | 19 (21.3%) |
| Disposal site for used disposable pad ( | |
| Along with other waste | 4 (14.3%) |
| Separately in a nearby open space | 24 (85.7%) |
| Preferred choice of adsorbents | |
| Disposable Pads | 91 (77.8%) |
| Reusable Cloth | 26 (22.2%) |
| Reason for preferring Disposable pads ( | |
| Clean | 47 (40.2%) |
| Hygienic | 18 (19.8%) |
| Easy to use | 15 (16.5%) |
| Comfortable | 11 (12.1%) |
| Reason for preferring Reusable cloth ( | |
| Easy availability | 14 (53.8%) |
| Reusability | 10 (38.5%) |
| Habit | 2 (7.7%) |
| Perceived sustainable choice in disasters | |
| Disposable Pads | 31 (26.5%) |
| Reusable Cloth | 86 (73.5%) |
Factors affecting the use of adsorbents in immediate post-earthquake Nepal
| Variables | Type of Adsorbents used after earthquake | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reusable Cloth (%) | Disposable Pads (%) | |||
| Age | ||||
| 15-24 years | 27 (64.3) | 15 (35.7) | 1 | |
| 25-34 years | 34 (85.0) | 6 (15.0) | 3.14 (1.07 – 9.20) | 0.031 |
| 35-45 years | 28 (80.0) | 7 (20.0) | 2.22 (0.78 – 6.29) | 0.128 |
| Education | ||||
| School education | 51 (66.2) | 26 (33.8) | 1 | .000 |
| No School Education | 38 (95. 0) | 2 (5.0) | 9.68 (2.16 – 43.33) | |
| Marital Status | ||||
| Unmarried | 20 (60.6) | 13 (39.4) | 1 | .014 |
| Married | 69 (82.1) | 15 (17.9) | 2.99 (1.22 – 7.31) | |
| Type of Adsorbents used before Earthquake | ||||
| Disposable Pads | 21 (53.8) | 18 (46.2) | 1 | .000 |
| Reusable Cloth | 68 (87.2) | 10 (12.8) | 5.82 (2.33 – 14.55) | |