Literature DB >> 29394456

The impact of negative childbirth experience on future reproductive decisions: A quantitative systematic review.

Shefaly Shorey1, Yen Yen Yang1, Emily Ang2.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to systematically retrieve, critique and synthesize available evidence regarding the association between negative childbirth experiences and future reproductive decisions.
BACKGROUND: A child's birth is often a joyous event; however, there is a proportion of women who undergo negative childbirth experiences that have long-term implications on their reproductive decisions.
DESIGN: A systematic review of quantitative studies was undertaken using Joanna Briggs Institute's methods. REVIEW
METHODS: A search was carried out in CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from January 1996 - July 2016. Studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were assessed by two independent reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tools. Data were extracted under subheadings adapted from the institute's data extraction forms.
RESULTS: Twelve studies, which examined either one or more influences of negative childbirth experiences, were identified. The included studies were either cohort or cross-sectional designs. Five studies observed positive associations between prior negative childbirth experiences and decisions to not have another child, three studies found positive associations between negative childbirth experiences and decisions to delay a subsequent birth and six studies concluded positive associations between negative childbirth experiences and maternal requests for caesarean section in subsequent pregnancies.
CONCLUSION: To receive a holistic understanding on negative childbirth experiences, a suitable definition and validated measuring tools should be used to understand this phenomenon. Future studies or reviews should include a qualitative component and/or the exploration of specific factors such as cultural and regional differences that influence childbirth experiences.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caesarean section; childbirth; delayed childbearing; literature review; midwives; negative childbirth experience; nurses; reproductive behaviour; reproductive decision; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29394456     DOI: 10.1111/jan.13534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  7 in total

1.  Maternal childbirth experience and induction of labour in each mode of delivery: a retrospective seven-year cohort study of 95,051 parturients in Finland.

Authors:  Johanna M Joensuu; Hannu Saarijärvi; Hanna Rouhe; Mika Gissler; Veli-Matti Ulander; Seppo Heinonen; Paulus Torkki; Tomi S Mikkola
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Postpartum psychiatric disorders and subsequent live birth: a population-based cohort study in Denmark.

Authors:  X Liu; O Plana-Ripoll; K G Ingstrup; E Agerbo; R Skjærven; T Munk-Olsen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Abbaspoor; Lida Moghaddam-Banaem; Shabnam Ronaghi; Anna Dencker
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

4.  Policy, service, and training provision for women following a traumatic birth: an international knowledge mapping exercise.

Authors:  Gill Thomson; Magali Quillet Diop; Suzannah Stuijfzand; Antje Horsch
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Childbirth violence-based negative health consequences: a qualitative study in Iranian women.

Authors:  Ziba Taghizadeh; Abbas Ebadi; Molouk Jaafarpour
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth.

Authors:  Katariina Place; Leena Rahkonen; Niina Verho-Reischl; Katti Adler; Seppo Heinonen; Heidi Kruit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Fertility intentions and the way they change following birth- a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Heidi Preis; Selen Tovim; Pnina Mor; Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky; Arnon Samueloff; Yael Benyamini
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.