| Literature DB >> 29393907 |
Amalia B Gallardo1,2, Ana R Díaz-Marrero3, José M de la Rosa4, Luis D'Croz5,6, Germán Perdomo7, Irene Cózar-Castellano8, José Darias9, Mercedes Cueto10.
Abstract
Two new chloro-furanocembranolides (1, 2) and two new 1,4-diketo cembranolides (3, 4) were isolated from the crude extract of Leptogorgia sp. together with a new seco-furanocembranolide (5) and the known Z-deoxypukalide (6), rubifolide (7), scabrolide D (8) and epoxylophodione (9). Their structures were determined based on spectroscopic evidence. Four compounds: 1, 2, 7 and 8 were found to activate the proliferation of pancreatic insulin-producing (beta) cells.Entities:
Keywords: Leptogorgia; cembranolides; chloro-furanocembranolides; diketocembranolides; furanocembranolides; pancreatic beta-cells; seco-furanocembranolides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29393907 PMCID: PMC5852477 DOI: 10.3390/md16020049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Novel chloro-furanocembranolides (1, 2), 1,4-diketocembranolides (3, 4), seco-furanocembranolide (5) and the known Z-deoxypukalide (6), rubifolide (7), scabrolide D (8) and epoxylophodione (9) from Leptogorgia sp.
1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data [500 and 125 MHz, CDCl3] of compounds 1 and 2.
| No. | 1 | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC, Type | δH ( | δC, Type | δH ( | |
| 1 | 37.6, CH | 3.39, m | 39.7, CH | 2.46, dddd (2.2, 2.5, 9.5, 11.7) |
| 2 | 32.9, CH2 | 3.15, m | 32.7, CH2 | a: 2.97, dd (2.5, 14.8) |
| 3 | 161.3, C | - | 162.1, C | - |
| 4 | 123.4, C | - | 122.7, C | - |
| 5 | 106.5, CH | 6.70, s | 106.5, CH | 6.80, s |
| 6 | 156.0, C | - | 154.3, C | - |
| 7 | 74.0, CH | 5.29, s | 75.6, CH | 4.59, s |
| 8 | 74.3, C | - | 73.6, C | - |
| 9 | 40.5, CH2 | 1.51, m | 43.0, CH | b: 1.89, dd (11.7, 14.8) |
| 10 | 74.3, CH | 4.85, dd (5.2, 11.3) | 78.4, CH | 4.97, m |
| 11 | 62.9, CH | 3.73, s | 148.6, C | 5.86, s |
| 12 | 60.6, C | - | 136.2, C | - |
| 13 | 22.5, CH2 | a: 1.45, m | 21.7, CH2 | a: 2.14, m |
| 14 | 30.4, CH2 | 1.42, m | 30.2, CH2 | 1.60, ddd (2.8, 2.8, 15.1) |
| 15 | 144.2, C | - | 146.9, C | - |
| 16 | 118.0, CH2 | 5.37, s; | 117.0, CH2 | 5.19, s; |
| 17 | 46.6, CH2 | 4.18, br s | 47.2, CH2 | 4.12, br s |
| 18 | 184.7, CH | 9.89, s | 184.3, CH | 9.97, s |
| 19 | 22.4, CH3 | 1.35, s | 19.6, CH3 | 1.41, s |
| 20 | 172.1, C | - | 173.5, C | - |
Figure 21H-1H-COSY (—), HMBC (→) correlations of 1.
Figure 3Selected NOE effects (↔) of 1 and 2 and leptodiol, lophodiol A and sinumaximol B.
Selected 1H and 13C NMR data [CDCl3] of leptodiol, lophodiol A, 1, sinumaximol B and 2.
| No. | Leptodiol | Lophodiol A | 1 | Sinumaximol B | 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH-7 | 5.12, br s | 5.24, s | 5.29, s | 4.52, s | 4.59, s |
| δH-9 | 1.61, dd (8.8, 14.5) | 1.55, m | 1.55, m | 1.85, dd (11.5, 14.5) | 1.89, dd (11.7, 14.8) |
| δH-19 | 1.38, s | 1.40 s | 1.40, s | 1.38, s | 1.41, s |
| δC-19 | 22.7 | 22.7 | 22.4 | 19.8 | 19.6 |
| δC-7 | 73.5 | 73.4 | 74.0 | 76.1 | 75.6 |
| δC-9 | 41.1 | 40.9 | 40.5 | 43.2 | 43.0 |
1H and 13C NMR Spectroscopic data [500 and 125 MHz, CDCl3] of compounds 3, 4 and 5.
| No. | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC, Mult. | δH ( | δC, Mult. | δH ( | δC, Mult. | δH ( | |
| 1 | 39.7 CH | 2.64, ddd | 35.4 CH | 2.90, m | 45.7, CH | 2.70, m |
| 2 | 49.7, CH2 | 2.44, m | 49.9, CH2 | 2.53 m | 32.3, CH2 | 3.12, dd (6.6, 14.2) |
| 3 | 215.4, C | - | 215.3, C | - | 166.6, C | - |
| 4 | 41.9, CH | 2.89, ddd | 41.7, CH | 2.90, m | 116.7, C | - |
| 5 | 60.8, CH | 3.31, d (10.4) | 60.9, CH | 3.31, d (10.3) | 122.0, CH | 7.44, s |
| 6 | 203.5, C | - | 205.8, C | - | 150.6, C | - |
| 7 | 55.9, CH2 | 2.68, m | 55.9, CH2 | 2.69, m | 177.1, CH | 9.54, s |
| 8 | 74.3, C | - | 74.3, C | - | 204.3, C | - |
| 9 | 45.6, CH2 | b: 1.92, m | 45.6, CH2 | b: 1.90, dd (2.6, 15.4) | 46.5, CH2 | 2.63, dd (7.3, 17.7) |
| 10 | 90.5, C | - | 90.3, C | - | 76.6, CH | 5.27, m |
| 11 | 155.9, CH | 6.76, s | 156.0, CH | 6.79, s | 147.7, CH | 7.11, m |
| 12 | 131.4, C | - | 131.1, C | - | 134.3, C | - |
| 13 | 24.0, CH2 | a: 2.27, ddd (5.4, 9.3, 14.3) | 22.8, CH2 | a: 2.28, m | 23.1, CH2 | 2.16, m |
| 14 | 31.7, CH2 | 1.89, m | 31.5, CH2 | 2.00, m | 30.1, CH2 | 1.64, m |
| 15 | 149.4, CH | - | 149.3, C | - | 144.8, C | - |
| 16 | 109.7, CH2 | 4.68, br s; | 114.7, CH2 | 5.00, s; | 113.6, CH2 | 4.64, br s |
| 17 | 20.9, CH3 | 1.69, s | 47.6, CH2 | 4.03, m | 18.0, CH3 | 1.68, s |
| 18 | 17.2, CH3 | 1.04, d (6.6) | 17.3, CH3 | 1.04, d (6.6) | 162.9,C | - |
| 19 | 30.1, CH3 | 1.37, s | 30.1, CH3 | 1.37, s | 30.5, CH3 | 2.21, s |
| 20 | 170.6, C | - | 171.6, C | - | 172.9, C | - |
| O | - | - | - | - | 51.8, CH3 | 3.86, s |
Figure 41H-1H-COSY (—), HMBC (→) and selected NOE effects (↔) of 3.
Figure 51H-1H-COSY (—) and HMBC (→) correlations of 5 and bipinnatin J.
Beta-cell proliferation measurement after treating INS-1 beta-cells with each compound.
| Compound (0.1 μM) | Proliferation Ratio a |
|---|---|
| 2.5 ± 0.65 | |
| 2.0 ± 0.61 | |
| Rubifolide ( | 3.3 ± 0.80 b |
| Scabrolide D ( | 2.8 ± 0.69 b |
a Fold change above untreated cells (1.0). A threshold over 1.5-fold was considered to increase proliferation. b p < 0.05 versus control.