| Literature DB >> 32708004 |
Miriam Corraliza-Gómez1, Amalia B Gallardo2,3, Ana R Díaz-Marrero2, José M de la Rosa2, Luis D'Croz4,5, José Darias2, Eduardo Arranz1, Irene Cózar-Castellano1,6, María D Ganfornina1, Mercedes Cueto2.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are age-related disorders caused by progressive neuronal death in different regions of the nervous system. Neuroinflammation, modulated by glial cells, is a crucial event during the neurodegenerative process; consequently, there is an urgency to find new therapeutic products with anti-glioinflammatory properties. Five new furanocembranolides (1-5), along with leptolide, were isolated from two different extracts of Leptogorgia sp., and compound 6 was obtained from chemical transformation of leptolide. Their structures were determined based on spectroscopic evidence. These seven furanocembranolides were screened in vitro by measuring their ability to modulate interleukin-1β (IL-1β) production by microglial BV2 cells after LPS (lipopolysaccharide) stimulation. Leptolide and compounds 3, 4 and 6 exhibited clear anti-inflammatory effects on microglial cells, while compound 2 presented a pro-inflammatory outcome. The in vitro results prompted us to assess anti-glioinflammatory effects of leptolide in vivo in a high-fat diet-induced obese mouse model. Interestingly, leptolide treatment ameliorated both microgliosis and astrogliosis in this animal model. Taken together, our results reveal a promising direct biological effect of furanocembranolides on microglial cells as bioactive anti-inflammatory molecules. Among them, leptolide provides us a feasible therapeutic approach to treat neuroinflammation concomitant with metabolic impairment.Entities:
Keywords: Leptogorgia; anti-inflammatory compounds; astrocytes; bioactive natural products; drug discovery; furanocembranolides; gliosis; high-fat diet; leptolide; microglia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32708004 PMCID: PMC7459604 DOI: 10.3390/md18080378
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Novel furanocembranolides (1−6) and leptolide (7).
1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (500 and 125 MHz, CDCl3) of compounds 1 and 2.
| No. | 1 | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC, Type | δH ( | δC, Type | δH ( | |
| 1 | 40.1, CH | 3.24, m | 40.2, CH | 3.27, dd (11.2, 11.2) |
| 2 | 31.9, CH2 | 3.00, m | 31.6, CH2 | 2.96, dd (2.9, 16.8) |
| 3 | 162.4, C | - | 162.6, C | - |
| 4 | 123.2, C | - | 124.3, C | - |
| 5 | 106.4, CH | 6.69, s | 107.0, CH | 6.63, s |
| 6 | 155.2, C | - | 151.8, C | - |
| 7 | 73.2, CH | 5.28, s | 74.6, CH | 6.21, s |
| 8 | 74.5, C | - | 73.9, C | - |
| 9 | 40.5, CH2 | 1.51, dd (11.0, 15.2) | 40.8, CH2 | 1.45, dd (12.2, 14.9) |
| 10 | 74.5, CH | 4.85, dd (5.0, 11.0) | 74.3, CH | 4.81, dd (5.8, 10.7) |
| 11 | 63.0, CH | 3.70, s | 62.9, CH | 3.72, s |
| 12 | 61.0, C | - | 61.0, C | - |
| 13 | 22.6, CH2 | a: 1.39, m | 22.5 CH2 | a: 1.36, m |
| 14 | 29.2, CH2 | a: 1.26, m | 28.8 CH2 | a: 1.19, m |
| 15 | 144.9, C | - | 144.7, C | - |
| 16 | 114.1, CH2 | a: 4.97, dd (1.6, 1.6) | 114.2, CH2 | a: 4.97, dd, (1.6, 1.6) |
| 17 | 18.8, CH3 | 1.77, s | 18.8 CH3 | 1.76, s |
| 18 | 184.7, CH | 9.89, s | 184.6, CH | 9.87, s |
| 19 | 22.5, CH3 | 1.34, s | 23.4, CH3 | 1.39, s |
| 20 | 172.5, C | - | 171.4, C | - |
| 7-CH3 | 170.1, C | - | ||
| 7- | 21.0, CH3 | 2.12, s | ||
Figure 21H−1H-COSY (—), HMBC (→) correlations of 1.
1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (500 and 125 MHz, CDCl3) of compounds 3 and 4.
| No. | 3 | 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC, Type | δH ( | δC, Type | δH ( | |
| 1 | 43.8, CH | 2.22, m | 43.8, CH | 2.25, m |
| 2 | 31.8, CH2 | 2.81, dd (2.2, 14.1) | 31.8, CH2 | 2.89, dd (2.9, 14.8) |
| 3 | 162.9, C | - | 163.5, C | - |
| 4 | 125.6, C | - | 125.3, C | - |
| 5 | 106.4, CH | 6.78, s | 106.9, CH | 6.70, s |
| 6 | 154.6, C | - | 151.5, C | - |
| 7 | 75.6, CH | 4.57, s | 75.9, CH | 5.59, s |
| 8 | 73.7, C | - | 72.8, C | - |
| 9 | 43.0, CH | b: 1.87, dd (11.6, 14.8) | 43.2, CH2 | b: 1.95, dd (11.9, 15.1) |
| 10 | 78.8, CH | 4.96, m | 78.5, CH | 4.96, m |
| 11 | 148.7, CH | 5.81, s | 148.4, CH | 5.85, s |
| 12 | 133.6, C | - | 133.8, C | - |
| 13 | 21.7 CH2 | a: 2.10, m | 21.8, CH2 | a: 2.13, m |
| 14 | 28.5 CH2 | a: 1.49, m | 28.7, CH2 | a: 1.49, m |
| 15 | 145.7, C | - | 145.5, C | - |
| 16 | 113.2, CH2 | a: 4.82, s | 113.3, CH2 | a: 4.84, s |
| 17 | 19.2 CH3 | 1.77 s, br s | 19.3, CH3 | 1.78, s |
| 18 | 184.6, CH | 9.94, s | 184.3, C | 9.95, s |
| 19 | 19.7, CH3 | 1.40, s | 21.0, CH3 | 1.48, s |
| 20 | 173.5, C | - | 171.9, C | - |
| 7-CH3 | 169.5, C | - | ||
| 7- | 21.1, CH3 | 2.16, s | ||
1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (500 and 125 MHz, CDCl3) of compounds 5–6.
| No. | 5 | 6 * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC, Type | δH ( | δC, Type | δH ( | |
| 1 | 43.5, CH | 2.56 m | 41.0, CH | 3.13, m |
| 2 | 32.8, CH2 | 2.83, dd (2.6, 16.6) | 30.7, CH2 | 2.73, m |
| 3 | 159.8, C | - | 152.0 / 152.2, C | - |
| 4 | 115.9, C | - | 118.4 / 118.3, C | - |
| 5 | 110.4, CH | 6.45, s | 108.5 / 108.8, CH | 6.45 / 6.49, s |
| 6 | 150.4, C | - | 150.2 / 150.4, CH | - |
| 7 | 117.4, CH | 6.18, s | 75.0 / 74.9, CH | 6.17, s |
| 8 | 129.4, C | - | 73.9 / 74.0, C | - |
| 9 | 36.6, CH2 | 3.56, m | 40.9 / 40.8, CH | 1.88 m |
| 10 | 76.9, CH | 4.60, dd (4.5, 12.8) | 74.6 / 74.5, CH | 4.79, m |
| 11 | 61.3, CH | 3.81, s | 62.9, CH | 3.76, s |
| 12 | 60.8, C | - | 60.9 / 61.0, C | - |
| 13 | 21.7, CH2 | 1.59, m | 22.5, CH2 | 1.38, m |
| 14 | 28.8, CH2 | a: 1.05, m | 28.5 / 28.6, CH2 | a: 1.23, m |
| 15 | 144.3, C | - | 145.1, C | - |
| 16 | 113.8, CH2 | a: 4.89, s | 113.9, CH2 | a: 4.95, s |
| 17 | 19.4, CH3 | 1.76, s | 18.8, CH3 | 1.74, s |
| 18 | 164.3, C | - | 56.1, CH | 5.38 / 5.39, s |
| 19 | 25.2, CH3 | 2.01, s | 23.5 / 23.6, CH3 | 1.40, s |
| 20 | 172.2, C | - | 171.8, C | - |
| 21 | 51.7, CH3 | 3.82 s | - | |
| 7-CH3 | 170.4, C | |||
| 7- | 21.1, CH3 | 2.15, s | ||
| 18- | 117.9 / 117.6, C | |||
* NMR data of the mixture of epimers at C-18.
Figure 3Minimized structures and selected NOE (nuclear Overhauser effect) effects (↔ ) of 1, 3 and 5.
Selected 1H and 13C NMR data (CDCl3) of compounds 2 and 4 and epimers 6.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No. |
|
|
|
| δH-7 | 6.21, s | 6.17, s | 5.59, s |
| δH-9 | 1.45, dd 1.86, dd | 1.55, m 1.88 m | 1.95, dd 2.60, dd |
| δH-19 | 1.39, s | 1.35, s | 1.48 s |
| δC-7 | 74.6 | 74.0 | 75.9 |
| δC-9 | 40.8 | 40.5 | 43.2 |
| δC-19 | 23.4 | 22.4 | 21.0 |
1H NMR Δδ (δR−δS) values (CDCl3, ppm, recorded at 500 MHz) of the diastereomeric (S)-α-methoxyphenyl acetic acids (MPA) esters 1b and 1c.
| No. | δR | δS | ΔδR-S |
|---|---|---|---|
| δH-18 | 9.84 | 9.77 | +0.070 |
| δH-5 | 6.53 | 6.08 | +0.45 |
| δH-19 | 1.10 | 1.30 | −0.20 |
| δH-10 | 4.60 | 4.72 | −0.12 |
Figure 4Expression of IL-1β mRNA in vitro after LPS (lipopolysaccharide) stimulation and/or furanocembranolide treatment. (A) Experimental design. (B–H) Representative experiments showing the total fold change of IL-1β mRNA expression in comparison with basal conditions (vehicle alone): Each bar depicts the mean value between quintuplicate qPCR (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction) runs, and error bars represent standard deviation. (I,J) IL-1β mRNA fold regulation normalized to the LPS + DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide) response (considered 100%), separated into furanocembranolides that increase (I) or decrease (J) the response. Each bar represents the mean between three independent experiments, and error bars show standard error of the mean. Statistical differences were assessed by two-way ANOVA, followed by Holm–Sidak post hoc tests (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001) and by pairwise comparison of raw data by t-test (# p = 0.051).
Figure 5Leptolide treatment ameliorates microgliosis triggered by HFD (high-fat diet): (A) Representative immunofluorescence images from paraffin sections of mouse brains stained with Iba1. Calibration bars: 50 μm. (B) Immunohistochemical quantification of Iba1 protein expression, measured as percentage of Iba1-positive area per section, normalized to SD-Veh and considered 100% (n = 11–13 mice per group): Each dot represents the mean value of Iba1 (ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1)-positive area (between dentate gyrus and cortex) for an individual mouse. Statistical differences were assessed by three-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak post hoc tests. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. Only biologically relevant differences are shown. Abbreviations: SD = Standard Diet; HFD = High-Fat Diet; Veh = Vehicle; Lep = Leptolide.
Figure 6Leptolide treatment ameliorates astrogliosis triggered by HFD: (A) Representative immunofluorescence images from paraffin sections of mouse brains stained with GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein). Calibration bars: 50μm. (B) Immunohistochemical quantification of GFAP expression measured as intensity of fluorescence per area, normalized to SD vehicle, considered as 100% (n = 11–13 mice per group). Each dot represents the mean value of GFAP intensity per area (between dentate gyrus and corpus callosum) for an individual mouse. Statistical differences were assessed by three-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak post hoc tests. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. Only biologically relevant differences are shown. Abbreviations: SD = Standard Diet; HFD = High Fat Diet; Veh = Vehicle; Lep = Leptolide.
Primers used for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).
| Gene Name (ID) | Primer Name | Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| IL-1β (NM_008361.4) | Mouse IL1β-Forward | TGTAATGAAAGACGGCACACCCAC |
| Mouse IL1β-Reverse | GGCTTGTGCTCTGCTTGTGAGG | |
| Rpl18 (NM_009077.2) | Mouse Rpl18-Forward | TTCCGTCTTTCCGGACCT |
| Mouse Rpl18-Reverse | TCGGCTCATGAACAACCTCT |