Literature DB >> 29393758

Risk of intracranial hemorrhage after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: a population-based study.

Mohamad A Hussain1,2, Aziz S Alali3,4, Muhammad Mamdani5,6,7,8,9, Jack V Tu3,6,8,9,10, Gustavo Saposnik5,6,8,9,11, Konard Salata1,2, Avery B Nathens2,3,6,8,12, Charles de Mestral1,2,5, Deepak L Bhatt13, Subodh Verma2,5,7,14, Mohammed Al-Omran1,2,5,7,15.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVEIntracranial hemorrhage (ICH) associated with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome is a rare but major complication of carotid artery revascularization. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of ICH after carotid artery stenting (CAS) with that after endarterectomy (CEA).METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective population-based cohort study of patients who underwent carotid artery revascularization in the province of Ontario, Canada, between 2002 and 2015. The primary outcome was the rate of ICH that occurred within 90 days after carotid artery intervention among patients who underwent CAS versus that of those who underwent CEA. The authors used inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity scores to account for selection bias. In sensitivity analyses, patients who had postprocedure ischemic stroke were excluded, and the following subgroups were examined: patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, patients treated between 2010 and 2015, and patients aged ≥ 66 years (to account for antiplatelet and anticoagulant use).RESULTSA total of 16,688 patients underwent carotid artery revascularization (14% CAS, 86% CEA). Patients with more comorbid illnesses, symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, or cardiac disease and those who were taking antiplatelet agents or warfarin before surgery were more likely to undergo CAS. Among the overall cohort, 80 (0.48%) patients developed ICH within 90 days (0.85% after CAS, 0.42% after CEA). The 180-day mortality rate after ICH in the overall cohort was 2.7%, whereas the 180-day mortality rate among patients who suffered ICH was 42.5% (40% for CAS-treated patients, 43.3% for CEA-treated patients). In the adjusted analysis, patients who underwent CAS were significantly more likely to have ICH than those who underwent CEA (adjusted OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.32-2.36; p < 0.001). These results were consistent after excluding patients who developed postprocedure ischemic stroke (adjusted OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.41-2.56) and consistent among symptomatic (adjusted OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.16-2.63) and asymptomatic (adjusted OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.16-2.63) patients with carotid artery stenosis, among patients treated between 2010 and 2015 (adjusted OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.45-3.38), and among the subgroup of patients aged ≥ 66 years (adjusted OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.05-2.24) after adjusting for medication use.CONCLUSIONSCAS is associated with a rare but higher risk of ICH relative to CEA. Future research is needed to devise strategies that minimize the risk of this serious complication after carotid artery revascularization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  10th Revision; CAS = carotid artery stenting; CEA = carotid endarterectomy; Clinical Modification; ICD-10-CM = International Classification of Diseases; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; IPTW = inverse probability of treatment weighting; carotid artery stenosis; carotid endarterectomy; hyperperfusion syndrome; intracranial hemorrhage; stenting; vascular disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29393758     DOI: 10.3171/2017.8.JNS171142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  7 in total

1.  The short- and long-term efficacies of endovascular interventions for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients.

Authors:  Xingxiu Yang; Xiaohui Jia; Hua Ren; Hongxing Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Comparison of Outcomes in Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair vs Open Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Konrad Salata; Mohamad A Hussain; Charles de Mestral; Elisa Greco; Badr A Aljabri; Muhammad Mamdani; Thomas L Forbes; Deepak L Bhatt; Subodh Verma; Mohammed Al-Omran
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-07-03

3.  Emergency Cervical Carotid Artery Stenting After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Doo Hyuk Kwon; Seong Hwa Jang; Hyungjong Park; Sung-Il Sohn; Jeong-Ho Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Therapeutic strategy of severe circular calcified carotid plaque with hemodynamic impairment: A patient treated by carotid endarterectomy following balloon angioplasty to prevent hyperperfusion.

Authors:  Takaki Marutani; Daina Kashiwazaki; Shusuke Yamamoto; Naoki Akioka; Emiko Hori; Satoshi Kuroda
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-08-12

5.  Perioperative Blood Pressure Control in Carotid Artery Stenosis Patients With Carotid Angioplasty Stenting: A Retrospective Analysis of 173 Cases.

Authors:  Longlong Zheng; Jiang Li; Haixiao Liu; Hao Guo; Lei Zhao; Hao Bai; Zhongjun Yan; Yan Qu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Staged angioplasty versus regular carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis at high risk of hyperperfusion: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Dapeng Mo; Baixue Jia; Huaizhang Shi; Yaxuan Sun; Qingan Liu; Chengzhe Fan; Jianping Deng; Jinglin Yuan; Wei Wu; Changchun Jiang; Guilian Zhang; Hanjun Du; Ning Ma; Feng Gao; Xuan Sun; Ligang Song; Lian Liu; Guangge Peng; Yongjun Wang; Yilong Wang; Zhongrong Miao
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2020-09-24

7.  Emergency Carotid Endarterectomy Instead of Carotid Artery Stenting Reduces Delayed Hemorrhage in Thrombectomy Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Raveena Singh; Sven Dekeyzer; Arno Reich; Drosos Kotelis; Alexander Gombert; Martin Wiesmann; Omid Nikoubashman
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.649

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.