Sohye Lee1, Erica Schorr2, Niloufar Niakosari Hadidi2, Robin Kelley3, Diane Treat-Jacobson2, Ruth Lindquist2. 1. Loewenberg College of Nursing, University of Memphis, 4055 North Park Loop Community Health Building #3526, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA. slee26@memphis.edu. 2. School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 3. Mount Airy Baptist Church, Washington, D.C., USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Peer support has powerful potential to improve outcomes in a program of health behavior change; yet, how peer support is perceived by participants, its role, and how it contributes to intervention efficacy is not known, especially among African Americans. The purpose of this study was to identify the subjectively perceived experience and potential contributions of peer support to the outcomes of a peer group behavioral intervention designed to change health behavior to reduce risks for heart disease and stroke in African American men in a faith-based community. METHODS: A peer support group intervention was implemented to increase health knowledge and to improve health behaviors in line with the American Heart Association's Life Simple 7 domains (get active, control cholesterol, eat better, manage blood pressure, lose weight, reduce blood sugar, and stop smoking). Fourteen peer group sessions and eight follow-up interviews with program participants were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. RESULTS: Seven key themes emerged, including (1) enhancing access to health behavior information and resources, (2) practicing and applying problem-solving skills with group feedback and support, (3) discussing health behavior challenges and barriers, (4) sharing health behavior changes, (5) sharing perceived health outcome improvements and benefits, (6) feelings of belonging and being cared for, and (7) addressing health of family and community. CONCLUSION: Qualitative findings revealed a positive perception of peer support and greater understanding of potential reasons why it may be an effective strategy for African American men.
INTRODUCTION: Peer support has powerful potential to improve outcomes in a program of health behavior change; yet, how peer support is perceived by participants, its role, and how it contributes to intervention efficacy is not known, especially among African Americans. The purpose of this study was to identify the subjectively perceived experience and potential contributions of peer support to the outcomes of a peer group behavioral intervention designed to change health behavior to reduce risks for heart disease and stroke in African American men in a faith-based community. METHODS: A peer support group intervention was implemented to increase health knowledge and to improve health behaviors in line with the American Heart Association's Life Simple 7 domains (get active, control cholesterol, eat better, manage blood pressure, lose weight, reduce blood sugar, and stop smoking). Fourteen peer group sessions and eight follow-up interviews with program participants were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. RESULTS: Seven key themes emerged, including (1) enhancing access to health behavior information and resources, (2) practicing and applying problem-solving skills with group feedback and support, (3) discussing health behavior challenges and barriers, (4) sharing health behavior changes, (5) sharing perceived health outcome improvements and benefits, (6) feelings of belonging and being cared for, and (7) addressing health of family and community. CONCLUSION: Qualitative findings revealed a positive perception of peer support and greater understanding of potential reasons why it may be an effective strategy for African American men.
Authors: Emilia Gómez-Pardo; Juan Miguel Fernández-Alvira; Marta Vilanova; Domingo Haro; Ramona Martínez; Isabel Carvajal; Vanesa Carral; Carla Rodríguez; Mercedes de Miguel; Patricia Bodega; Gloria Santos-Beneit; Jose Luis Peñalvo; Iñaki Marina; Napoleón Pérez-Farinós; Marian Dal Re; Carmen Villar; Teresa Robledo; Rajesh Vedanthan; Sameer Bansilal; Valentin Fuster Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Marci Kramish Campbell; Marlyn Allicock Hudson; Ken Resnicow; Natasha Blakeney; Amy Paxton; Monica Baskin Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2007 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Fadia T Shaya; Viktor V Chirikov; C Daniel Mullins; Jon Shematek; Deleonardo Howard; Clyde Foster; Elijah Saunders Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2012-11-26 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Mercedes R Carnethon; Jia Pu; George Howard; Michelle A Albert; Cheryl A M Anderson; Alain G Bertoni; Mahasin S Mujahid; Latha Palaniappan; Herman A Taylor; Monte Willis; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paul A Robbins; Melissa J Scott; Eugenia Conde; Yannet Daniel; William A Darity; Keisha L Bentley-Edwards Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2020-10-16
Authors: K Majjouti; L Küppers; A Thielmann; M Redaélli; F Vitinius; C Funke; I van der Arend; L Pilic; M Hessbrügge; S Stock; B Weltermann; D Wild Journal: BMC Prim Care Date: 2022-08-31