| Literature DB >> 29392532 |
Elizabeth M Hill1, Lynne A Robinson1,2, Ali Abdul-Sada1, Adam J Vanbergen2, Angela Hodge3, Sue E Hartley4,5.
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (Entities:
Keywords: Above-belowground interactions; Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis; Blumenols; Metabolomics; Microbiome; Phytobiome; Pyrrolizidine alkaloids; Rhizophagus irregularis; Senecio jacobaea
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29392532 PMCID: PMC5843688 DOI: 10.1007/s10886-017-0921-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Chem Ecol ISSN: 0098-0331 Impact factor: 2.626
Fig. 1a Orthogonal partial least square-discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA) scores plot of the chemical profiles of root extracts from control and Rhizophagus irregularis treated ragwort, b Partial least square-discriminate analysis (PLS-DA) scores plot of the chemical profiles of leaves from control and R. irregularis treated ragwort. Open and closed circles represent control and R. irregularis treated ragwort plants, respectively. In b, blue symbols represent samples from new leaves and orange symbols those from old leaves and the percentages of explained variation (R2Y) modelled by the first two latent variables are displayed on the axes. Both plots show datasets from samples profiled in positive ESI MS mode; data from negative ESI mode revealed similar model characteristics (Fig. S1)
Metabolites identified in ragwort roots that were significantly increased after colonisation by Rhizophagus irregularis
| Metabolite number¶ | Observed ion ( | UPLC- TOFMS r.t. | Putative formula | Theoretical mass of ion | Putative identity | Fold change a | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 389.2177 | 6.37 | C19H33O8 | 389.2175 | 13-hydroxyblumenol C glycoside [M + H]+ | 1151.2* | 6.65 × 10−9 |
| 1 | 387.2018 | 6.37 | C19H31O8 | 387.2018 | 13-hydroxyblumenol C glycoside [M-H]− | 746.6* | 6.65 × 10−9 |
| 2 | 373.2228 | 7.23 | C19H33O7 | 373.2226 | Blumenol C glycoside [M + H]+ | 8065.8 | 6.65 × 10−9 |
| 3 | 547.2389 | 7.30 | C25H39O13 | 547.2391 | Blumenol C glycosyl-glucuronide [M-H]− | 1553.3 | 6.65 × 10−9 |
| 4 | 475.2182 | 7.55 | C22H35O11 | 475.2179 | 13-hydroxyblumenol C malonylglycoside [M + H]+ | 489.7 | 2.99 × 10−7 |
| 5 | 373.2222 | 8.20 | C19H33O7 | 373.2226 | Blumenol C glycoside [M + H]+ | 5032.0 | 6.65 × 10−9 |
| 6 | 635.2551 | 8.24 | C28H43O16 | 635.2551 | Blumenol C malonylglycosyl-glucuronide [M + H]+ | 3101.3* | 6.65 × 10−9 |
| 6 | 633.2396 | 8.24 | C28H41O16 | 633.2395 | Blumenol C malonylglycosyl-glucuronide [M-H]− | 250.4* | 6.65 × 10−9 |
| 7 | 459.2232 | 9.38 | C22H35O10 | 459.2230 | Blumenol C malonylglycoside [M + H]+ | 1109.2 | 6.65 × 10−9 |
| 8 | 494.3247 | 14.20 | C24H49NO7P | 494.3247 | Hexadecenoyl-glycero-phosphocholine [M + H]+ | 7.86 | 2.00 × 10–7c |
¶Structures given in Fig. 2
r.t. = retention time
aFold change indicates the concentration increase in roots colonised with AMF when compared to the concentrations observed in control plants
bSignificance determined using t-tests (c) or Mann-Whitney U tests (unmarked) after Bonferroni adjustments
* Differences in estimation of fold change between [M + H]+ and [M-H]− signals for the same metabolite were due to presence of a Na adduct competing with the [M + H]+ ion in positive ESI mode
Fig. 2Schematic structure of the identified blumenol apocarotenoids associated with Rhizophagus irregularis colonisation of ragwort roots
Spearman rank-order correlations (N = 16) between the concentration of the blumenol metabolites measured in ragwort roots and Rhizophagus irregularis colonisation in the AMF-treated plants
| Metabolite structure (see Fig. | Putative identity | Correlation coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13-hydroxyblumenol C glycoside | 0.852 | 1.16 × 10−9 |
| 2 | Blumenol C glycoside | 0.902 | 4.33 × 10−12 |
| 3* | Blumenol C glycosyl-glucuronide | 0.828 | 9.37 × 10−9 |
| 4 | 13-hydroxyblumenol C malonylglycoside | 0.841 | 3.21 × 10−9 |
| 5 | Blumenol C glycoside | 0.844 | 2.41 × 10−9 |
| 6 | Blumenol C malonylglycosyl-glucuronide | 0.832 | 6.39 × 10−9 |
| 7 | Blumenol C malonylglycoside | 0.855 | 9.36 × 10−10 |
*Result from MS analysis in -ESI mode (required to detect metabolite 3); all other results from +ESI mode
¶All P-values significant after Bonferroni adjustment
Average relative concentrations (±S.E.) of the pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA) signals measured in the positive ESI UPLC-TOFMS profiles of control (N = 15) and Rhizophagus irregularis colonised (N = 16) ragwort roots
| Theoretical mass of ion | Putative formula | UPLC-TOFMS r.t. | Control | Fold changeb,c | Putative identityc | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 334.1654 | C18H23NO5 | 6.00 | 49.7 (±5.3) | 59.2 (±5.3) | 0.188 | ||
| 336.1811 | C18H25NO5 | 6.86 | 211.7 (±17.7) | 289.8 (±21.6) | 3.63 × 10−3 | 1.37 | Senecionine |
| 350.1604 | C18H23NO6 | 6.34 | 220.5 (±27.7) | 223.2 (±21.6) | 0.571 | ||
| C18H23NO6 | 9.01 | 24.5 (±3.2) | 38.6 (±6.2) | 0.054 | |||
| 352.1760 | C18H25NO6 | 4.89 | 23.7 (±8.7) | 52.0 (±14.2) | 0.033 | ||
| C18H25NO6 | 5.82 | 76.1 (±11.3) | 55.3 (±5.4) | 0.216 | |||
| C18H25NO6 | 6.13 | 327.9 (±23.9) | 303.8 (±17.9) | 0.711 | |||
| C18H25NO6 | 6.99 | 48.8 (±2.5) | 53.0 (±2.4) | 0.029 | |||
| C18H25NO6 | 7.16 | 108.8 (±4.2) | 113.0 (±3.5) | 0.110 | |||
| 366.1553 | C18H23NO7 | 4.29 | 193.2 (±46.1) | 174.4 (±31.4) | 0.598 | ||
| C18H23NO7 | 4.98 | 126.0 (±33.8) | 141.9 (±39.5) | 0.891 | |||
| 368.1709 | C18H25NO7 | 5.24 | 45.9 (±6.7) | 65.2 (±10.2) | 4.81 × 10−3 | 1.42 | Usaramine N-oxide |
| C18H25NO7 | 5.62 | 93.8 (±20.2) | 119.3 (±18.8) | 0.231 | |||
| C18H25NO7 | 6.39 | 550.5 (±54.4) | 530.8 (±38.6) | 0.953 | |||
| 370.1866 | C18H27NO7 | 5.94 | 24.0 (±2.2) | 25.8 (±2.8) | 0.379 | ||
| 376.1760 | C20H25NO6 | 9.55 | 118.5 (±12.1) | 118.4 (±14.3) | 1.000 | ||
| 386.1815 | C18H27NO8 | 3.68 | 34.6 (±9.9) | 105.6 (±16.0) | 2.01 × 10−3 | 3.05 | Jacoline N-oxide |
| 392.1709 | C20H25NO7 | 9.77 | 196.5 (±26.17) | 194.0 (±31.4 | 0.740 | ||
| 404.1476 | C18H26NO7Cl | 5.22 | 39.3 (±9.73) | 122.2 (±13.5) | 5.87 × 10−5 | 3.11 | Jaconine N-oxide |
Relative concentrations were quantified as the ratio of the analyte signal: internal standard signal per 0.3 mg plant mass
aResults that were significant after Benjamini and Hochberg corrections (Benjamini et al. 2001) are displayed in bold
bFold change indicates the concentration increase in roots colonised with AMF when compared to the concentrations observed in control plants
cOnly given for those PAs that differed significantly between treatment groups