| Literature DB >> 25666592 |
Xianqin Wei1, Klaas Vrieling, Patrick P J Mulder, Peter G L Klinkhamer.
Abstract
Plants produce a diversity of secondary metabolites (SMs) to protect them from generalist herbivores. On the other hand, specialist herbivores use SMs for host plant recognition, feeding and oviposition cues, and even sequester SMs for their own defense. Therefore, plants are assumed to face an evolutionary dilemma stemming from the contrasting effects of generalist and specialist herbivores on SMs. To test this hypothesis, bioassays were performed with F2 hybrids from Jacobaea species segregating for their pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs), using a specialist flea beetle (Longitarsus jacobaeae) and a generalist slug (Deroceras invadens). Our study demonstrated that while slug feeding damage was negatively correlated with the concentration of total PAs and that of senecionine-like PAs, flea beetle feeding damage was not affected by PAs. It was positively correlated though, with leaf fresh weight. The generalist slug was deterred by senecionine-like PAs but the specialist flea beetle was adapted to PAs in its host plant. Testing other herbivores in the same plant system, it was observed that the egg number of the specialist cinnabar moth was positively correlated with jacobine-like PAs, while the silver damage of generalist thrips was negatively correlated with senecionine- and jacobine-like PAs, and the pupae number of generalist leaf miner was negatively correlated with otosenine-like PAs. Therefore, while the specialist herbivores showed no correlation whatsoever with PA concentration, the generalist herbivores all showed a negative correlation with at least one type of PA. We concluded that the generalist herbivores were deterred by different structural groups of PAs while the specialist herbivores were attracted or adapted to PAs in its host plants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25666592 PMCID: PMC4351440 DOI: 10.1007/s10886-015-0551-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Chem Ecol ISSN: 0098-0331 Impact factor: 2.626
Fig. 1Scatter plots of the slug arcsine square root-transformed percentage of feeding damage corrected for trial (SFR) and the concentration of total pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) (a), senecionine-like PAs (b), jacobine-like PAs (c), erucifoline-like PAs (d), otosenine-like PAs (e) of 87 F2 hybrids of Jacobaea vulgaris and Jacobaea aquatica. All PAs were log transformed to obtain normal distribution. Each dot represents the genotypic mean value of one of the 87 F2 genotypes
Multiple regression of the slug feeding residual (SFR) against the sum concentration of the four main structural groups of pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs, µg/g dw) in the host plants of 87 F2 hybrid genotypes from a cross between Jacobaea vulgaris and Jacobaea aquatica. For the regression model: adjusted R = 0.0973; F = 3.318; P = 0.014
| Predictorsa | Estimate |
|
|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | −0.001 | −0.062 |
| Sn | −0.049 | −2.479* |
| Jb | −0.030 | −1.556 |
| Er | −0.007 | −0.354 |
| Ot | 0.042 | 2.195* |
*P < 0.05
aSn, Jb, Er, and Ot are log transformed concentration of senecionine-, jacobine-, erucifoline-, and otosenine- like PAs
Multiple regression of flea beetle feeding residual (BFR) corrected for trials against the sum concentration of four structural groups of pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs, µg/g dw) in the 84 F2 hybrid genotypes from a cross between Jacobaea vulgaris and Jacobaea aquatica. For the regression model: adjusted R = 0.2425; F = 2.771; P = 0.002
| Predictorsa | Estimate |
|
|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | −5.773 | −1.112 |
| Fw | 11.680 | 3.706** |
| Sn | 0.234 | 0.162 |
| Jb | −0.117 | −0.126 |
| Er | 0.276 | 0.180 |
| Ot | 0.492 | 0.771 |
**P < 0.01
aSn, Jb, Er, Ot are log transformed concentration of senecionine-, jacobine-, erucifoline-, and otosenine- like PAs. Fw is the genotypic mean of leaf fresh weight
Fig. 2Scatter plot of the genotypic mean of leaf fresh weight and genotypic mean of flea beetle feeding damage. Each dot is the mean of 4–6 replicates of 84 F2 genotypes
Pearson correlation tests among five different herbivore feedinga bioassays of Jacobaea F2 hybrids from a cross between Jacobaea vulgaris and Jacobaea aquatica
| Specialist herbivores | Generalist herbivores | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flea beetle ( | Cinnabar moth ( | Slug ( | Thrips ( | Leafminer ( | |
| Flea beetle | |||||
| Cinnabar moth | 0.057 | ||||
| Slug | −0.191 | −0.136 | |||
| Thrips | −0.101 | −0.047 | 0.334** | ||
| Leafminer | 0.094 | −0.189 | −0.091 | −0.095 | |
**P < 0.01
aProxies for herbivore feeding used: flea beetle feeding residual, corrected for leaf fresh weight, for the flea beetle (Longitarsus jacobaeae) bioassay; the number of egg batches, corrected for cage number, for the cinnabar moth (Tyria jacobaeae) oviposition bioassay; the slug feeding residual (SFR) for the slug (Deroceras invadens) bioassay; the log transformed silver damage for the Western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) bioassay and the number of pupae, corrected for plant size, for the American serpentine leafminer (Liriomyza trifolii) bioassay
Summary of Pearson correlations between pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA) concentrations and the proxies of herbivore feedinga in the five bioassays conducted with Jacobaea F2 hybrids from a cross between Jacobaea vulgaris and Jacobaea aquatica
| PA | Specialist herbivores | Generalist herbivores | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flea beetle ( | Cinnabar moth ( | Slug ( | Thrips ( | Leafminer ( | |
| Total tertiary amines | 0.079 | 0.391* | −0.206 | −0.266** | −0.235* |
| Total N-oxide | 0.042 | 0.043 | −0.283** | −0.282** | −0.060 |
| Senecionine-like PAs | 0.030 | −0.042 | −0.259* | −0.204* | −0.091 |
| Jacobine-like PAs | 0.017 | 0.350* | −0.167 | −0.297* | −0.188 |
| Erucifoline-like PAs | −0.004 | −0.078 | −0.115 | −0.159 | 0.226* |
| Otosenine-like PAs | 0.088 | 0.303 | 0.173 | 0.030 | −0.267* |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
aThe feeding damage data used is the same as that in Table 3