| Literature DB >> 29391685 |
Essam S Soliman1, Rania T Hamad2, Amira Ahmed3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Prophylaxis and disease prevention is an essential strategy among biorisk management in poultry farms that stimulate and maintain the birds' immunity. The aim of this study was to investigate the prophylactic, and immune-stimulant influence of Nigella sativa Linn. in broilers under biological stress.Entities:
Keywords: Broiler; Escherichia coli; Nigella sativa Linn; histopathology; preventive
Year: 2017 PMID: 29391685 PMCID: PMC5771169 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.1447-1455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Feed ingredient and nutrient composition of basal ration at different growth stages of experimental birds.
| Components | Starter ration 1:10 days (%) | Grower ration 11:38 days (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Food ingredient | ||
| Yellow corn | 54 | 55 |
| Soybean meal | 22 | 16 |
| Corn gluten | 10 | 15 |
| Lime | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Sodium chloride | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| DL. Methionine | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| L. lysine | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| Soybean oil | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Vitamin premix | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Mineral premix | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Nutrient content | ||
| Energy | 2990 Kcal/kg | 3000 Kcal/kg |
| Protein | 23% | 22.5% |
| Fat | 5.60% | 2.84% |
| Row fiber | 3.80% | 3.39% |
Performance traits (mean±SE) in different experimental groups supplemented with N. sativa Linn. in face of E. coli challenge.
| Body weight (g) | Weight gain (g) | FCR (%) | Performance index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4% | 971.767c±4.070 | 422.033a±6.554 | 1.439b±0.028 | 6.835b±0.181 |
| 2.8% | 1055.230b±19.083 | 372.893ab±4.131 | 1.558b±0.013 | 6.655b±0.686 |
| 4.2% | 1083.467ab±20.383 | 388.500ab±9.152 | 1.526b±0.121 | 7.082ab±0.336 |
| 5.6% | 1118.363a±29.522 | 418.210a±6.439 | 1.306b±0.186 | 7.834a±0.254 |
| Control | 963.133c±2.316 | 330.900b±5.600 | 2.048a±0.115 | 5.443c±0.981 |
| p value | 0.001 | 0.010 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Means carrying different superscripts in the same column are significantly different at p≤0.05 or highly significantly different at p<0.01. Means carrying the same superscripts in the same column are non-significantly different at p>0.05.N. sativa = Nigella sativa, E. coli = Escherichia coli, FCR = Feed conversion ratio
Biochemical parameters (mean±SE) in different experimental groups supplemented with N. sativa Linn. in the face of E. coli challenge.
| Total protein (g/dl) | Albumin (g/dl) | Globulin (g/dl) | ALT (IU/L) | AST (IU/L) | Urea (mg/dl) | Creatinine (mg/dl) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4% | 3.57d±0.017 | 1.87d±0.002 | 1.69c±0.025 | 27.18b±0.051 | 36.18b±0.098 | 79.26b±0.132 | 0.56d±0.012 |
| 2.8% | 4.39b±0.008 | 3.17b±0.008 | 1.22d±0.014 | 26.91c±0.020 | 36.18b±0.154 | 75.12c±0.054 | 0.74b±0.003 |
| 4.2% | 4.39b±0.014 | 2.37c±0.007 | 2.02a±0.013 | 25.71d±0.051 | 34.88c±0.103 | 73.62d±0.688 | 0.49e±0.006 |
| 5.6% | 4.99a±0.012 | 3.87a±0.012 | 1.12e±0.030 | 27.41a±0.081 | 36.68a±0.075 | 75.72c±0.233 | 0.84a±0.018 |
| Control | 3.59c±0.007 | 1.87d±0.027 | 1.72b±0.018 | 27.21b±0.104 | 36.18b±0.132 | 81.62a±0.054 | 0.59c±0.025 |
| p value | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Means carrying different superscripts in the same column are significantly different at p≤0.05 or highly significantly different at p<0.01. Means carrying the same superscripts in the same column are non-significantly different at p>0.05. ALT=Alanine aminotransferase, AST=Aspartate aminotransferase, N. sativa=Nigella sativa, E. coli=Escherichia coli, SE=Standard error
Immunoglobulin levels and logarithmic bacterial count (mean±SE) in different experimental groups supplemented with N. sativa Linn. in the face of E. coli challenge.
| Immunoglobulin | Log bacterial count | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgG (mg/ml) | IgA (mg/ml) | IgM (mg/ml) | TBC (CFU/ml) | TEC (CFU/ml) | |
| 1.4% | 1.359a±0.006 | 0.153a±0.003 | 0.204a±0.006 | 3.664d±0.005 | 3.990a±0.014 |
| 2.8% | 1.195b±0.026 | 0.144b±0.085 | 0.200a±0.013 | 3.673d±0.006 | 3.760b±0.063 |
| 4.2% | 1.340a±0.027 | 0.155a±0.007 | 0.206a±0.014 | 3.812b±0.011 | 3.113d±0.015 |
| 5.6% | 1.194b±0.002 | 0.143b±0.008 | 0.199a±0.006 | 3.769c±0.006 | 2.299e±0.018 |
| Control | 1.318a±0.009 | 0.153a±0.002 | 0.204a±0.004 | 5.747a±0.002 | 3.502c±0.009 |
| p value | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.662 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Means carrying different superscripts in the same column are significantly different at p≤0.05 or highly significantly different at p<0.01. Means carrying the same superscripts in the same column are non-significantly different at p<0.05. N. sativa=Nigella sativa, E. coli=Escherichia coli, SE=Standard error, TBC=Total bacterial count, TEC=Total Enterobacteriaceae count, Ig=Immunoglobulin
Correlation coefficient between immune organs’ weight, Ig levels with logarithmic TBC (above diagonal), and logarithmic TEC (below diagonal).
| r | Log TBC | Thymus | Spleen | Bursa | IgG | IgA | IgM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log TEC | 1 | 0.331 | 0.177 | 0.010 | 0.266 | 0.363 | 0.257 |
| Thymus | 0.092 | 1 | 0.853 | 0.829 | 0.170 | 0.645 | 0.148 |
| Spleen | 0.042 | 0.853 | 1 | 0.831 | 0.274 | 0.721 | 0.269 |
| Bursa | 0.227 | 0.829 | 0.831 | 1 | 0.033 | 0.527 | 0.013 |
| IgG | −0.474 | 0.170 | 0.274 | 0.033 | 1 | 0.801 | 0.990 |
| IgA | −0.200 | 0.645 | 0.721 | 0.527 | 0.801 | 1 | 0.795 |
| IgM | −0.454 | 0.148 | 0.269 | 0.013 | 0.990 | 0.795 | 1 |
Correlation is highly significant (p<0.01).
Correlation is significant (p<0.05).
NSCorrelation is non-significant (p>0.05). TBC = Total bacterial count, TEC = Total Enterobacteriaceae count, Ig = Immunoglobulin
Immune organs’ weight (mean±SE) in different experimental groups supplemented with N. sativa Linn. in the face of E. coli challenge.
| Thymus (g/kg) | Spleen (g/kg) | Bursa (g/kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4% | 2.494c±0.008 | 2.495c±0.045 | 2.546a±0.036 |
| 2.8% | 2.415d±0.105 | 2.586b±0.021 | 1.793d±0.081 |
| 4.2% | 2.900a±0.027 | 2.460c±0.101 | 2.014c±0.010 |
| 5.6% | 2.743b±0.018 | 2.760a±0.054 | 2.334b±0.011 |
| Control | 2.791b±0.063 | 2.211d±0.081 | 1.674e±0.041 |
| p value | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Means carrying different superscripts in the same column are significantly different at p≤0.05 or highly significantly different at p<0.01. Means carrying the same superscripts in the same column are non-significantly different at P>0.05. N. sativa=Nigella sativa, E. coli=Escherichia coli, SE=Standard error
Figure-1Histopathological examination of the liver in different broilers groups fed on different concentrations of Nigella sativa Linn. (a) Liver of control broilers. (b) Liver of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 1.4%. (c) Liver of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 2.8%. (d) Liver of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 4.2%. (e) Liver of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 5.6% (H and E, 40×).
Figure-2Histopathological examination of the heart in different broilers groups fed on different concentrations of Nigella sativa Linn. (a) Heart of control broilers. (b) Heart of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 1.4%. (c) Heart of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 2.8%. (d) Heart of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 4.2%. (e) Heart of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 5.6% (H and E, 40×).
Figure-3Histopathological examination of the Bursa in different broilers groups fed on different concentrations of Nigella sativa Linn. (a) Bursa of control broilers. (b) Bursa of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 1.4%. (c) Bursa of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 2.8%. (d) Bursa of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 4.2%. (e) Bursa of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 5.6% (H and E, 40×).
Figure-4Histopathological examination of the thymus in different broilers groups fed on different concentrations of Nigella sativa Linn. (a) Thymus of control broilers. (b) Thymus of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 1.4%. (c) Thymus of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 2.8%. (D) Thymus of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 4.2%. (e) Thymus of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 5.6% (H and E, 40×).
Figure-5Histopathological examination of the spleen in different broilers groups fed on different concentrations of Nigella sativa Linn. (a) Spleen of control broilers. (b) Spleen of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 1.4%. (c) Spleen of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 2.8%. (d) Spleen of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 4.2%. (e) Spleen of broilers fed N. sativa Linn. 5.6% (H and E, 40×).