Literature DB >> 29390862

Financial Incentives for Chronic Disease Management: Results and Limitations of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials With New York Medicaid Patients.

Eric M VanEpps1, Andrea B Troxel2, Elizabeth Villamil3, Kathryn A Saulsgiver4,5, Jingsan Zhu4, Jo-Yu Chin3, Jacqueline Matson3, Joseph Anarella6, Patrick Roohan7, Foster Gesten3, Kevin G Volpp4,8,9,10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify whether financial incentives promote improved disease management in Medicaid recipients diagnosed with hypertension or diabetes, respectively.
DESIGN: Four-group, multicenter, randomized clinical trials. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2013 and 2016, New York State Medicaid managed care members diagnosed with hypertension (N = 920) or with diabetes (N = 959). INTERVENTION: Participants in each 6-month trial were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 arms: (1) process incentives-earned by attending primary care visits and/or receiving prescription medication refills, (2) outcome incentives-earned by reducing systolic blood pressure (hypertension) or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; diabetes) levels, (3) combined process and outcome incentives, and (4) control (no incentives). MEASURES: Systolic blood pressure (hypertension) and HbA1c (diabetes) levels, primary care visits, and medication prescription refills. Analysis and
Results: At 6 months, there were no statistically significant differences between intervention arms and the control arm in the change in systolic blood pressure, P = .531. Similarly, there were no significant differences in blood glucose control (HbA1c) between the intervention arms and control after 6 months, P = .939. The majority of participants had acceptable systolic blood pressure (<140 mm Hg) or blood glucose (<8.0%) levels at baseline and throughout the study.
CONCLUSION: Financial incentives-regardless of whether they were delivered based on disease-relevant outcomes, process activities, or a combination of the two-have a negligible impact on health outcomes for Medicaid recipients diagnosed with either hypertension or diabetes in 2 studies in which, among other design and operational limitations, the majority of recipients had relatively well-controlled diseases at the time of enrollment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes; financial incentives; hypertension; incentives; interventions; medicaid; motivation; outcomes; population health; process; strategies

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29390862      PMCID: PMC7256969          DOI: 10.1177/0890117117753986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  11 in total

Review 1.  A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders.

Authors:  Jennifer Plebani Lussier; Sarah H Heil; Joan A Mongeon; Gary J Badger; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).

Authors:  Paul A James; Suzanne Oparil; Barry L Carter; William C Cushman; Cheryl Dennison-Himmelfarb; Joel Handler; Daniel T Lackland; Michael L LeFevre; Thomas D MacKenzie; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Sandra J Taler; Raymond R Townsend; Jackson T Wright; Andrew S Narva; Eduardo Ortiz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Effect of Process- and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives on Weight Loss Among Prediabetic New York Medicaid Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Eric M VanEpps; Andrea B Troxel; Elizabeth Villamil; Kathryn A Saulsgiver; Jingsan Zhu; Jo-Yu Chin; Jacqueline Matson; Joseph Anarella; Patrick Roohan; Foster Gesten; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2018-07-18

Review 4.  A review of diabetes treatment adherence and the association with clinical and economic outcomes.

Authors:  Carl Asche; Joanne LaFleur; Chris Conner
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  Medicaid incentive programs to encourage healthy behavior show mixed results to date and should be studied and improved.

Authors:  Karen J Blumenthal; Kathryn A Saulsgiver; Laurie Norton; Andrea B Troxel; Joseph P Anarella; Foster C Gesten; Michael E Chernew; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  P4P4P: an agenda for research on pay-for-performance for patients.

Authors:  Kevin G Volpp; Mark V Pauly; George Loewenstein; David Bangsberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  A randomized controlled trial of monetary incentives vs. outreach to enhance adherence to the hepatitis B vaccine series among injection drug users.

Authors:  Karen H Seal; Alex H Kral; Jennifer Lorvick; Alex McNees; Lauren Gee; Brian R Edlin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Hypertension treatment in a medicare population: adherence and systolic blood pressure control.

Authors:  Vicki Fung; Jie Huang; Richard Brand; Joseph P Newhouse; John Hsu
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Robin DiMatteo; Patrick J Giordani; Heidi S Lepper; Thomas W Croghan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update.

Authors:  Brian W Ward; Jeannine S Schiller; Richard A Goodman
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  6 in total

1.  Impact of a Patient-Centered Behavioral Economics Intervention on Hypertension Control in a Highly Disadvantaged Population: a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Martin F Shapiro; Suzanne B Shu; Noah J Goldstein; Ronald G Victor; Craig R Fox; Chi-Hong Tseng; Sitaram Vangala; Braden K Mogler; Stewart B Reed; Estivali Villa; José J Escarce
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 6.473

2.  Brief Report: Durability of the Effect of Financial Incentives on HIV Viral Load Suppression and Continuity in Care: HPTN 065 Study.

Authors:  Wafaa M El-Sadr; Geetha Beauchamp; H Irene Hall; Lucia V Torian; Barry S Zingman; Garret Lum; Richard A Elion; Kate Buchacz; David Burns; Allison Zerbe; Theresa Gamble; Deborah J Donnell
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  Assessment of Parents' Preferences for Incentives to Promote Engagement in Family-Based Childhood Obesity Treatment.

Authors:  Davene R Wright; Brian E Saelens; Angela Fontes; Tara A Lavelle
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-03-01

4.  A Digital Health Intervention (SweetGoals) for Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Protocol for a Factorial Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Catherine Stanger; Tobias Kowatsch; Haiyi Xie; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Frances Lim-Liberty; Molly Anderson; Prabhakaran Santhanam; Sarah Kaden; Briana Rosenberg
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-02-23

Review 5.  Interventions for Adherence Improvement in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: Expert Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Ihm; Kwang-Il Kim; Kyung Jin Lee; Jong Won Won; Jin Oh Na; Seung-Woon Rha; Hack-Lyoung Kim; Sang-Hyun Kim; Jinho Shin
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoting Huang; Xiuhua Weng; Shen Lin; Yiwei Liu; Shaohong Luo; Hang Wang; Wai-Kit Ming; Pinfang Huang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.