Eric M VanEpps1, Andrea B Troxel2, Elizabeth Villamil3, Kathryn A Saulsgiver4,5, Jingsan Zhu4, Jo-Yu Chin3, Jacqueline Matson3, Joseph Anarella6, Patrick Roohan7, Foster Gesten3, Kevin G Volpp4,8,9,10. 1. 1 David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 2. 2 Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 3. 3 New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA. 4. 4 Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 5. 5 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 6. 6 Consultant, Albany, NY, USA. 7. 7 MVP Health Care, Schenectady, NY, USA. 8. 8 Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 9. 9 Departments of Medicine and Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 10. 10 Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify whether financial incentives promote improved disease management in Medicaid recipients diagnosed with hypertension or diabetes, respectively. DESIGN: Four-group, multicenter, randomized clinical trials. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2013 and 2016, New York State Medicaid managed care members diagnosed with hypertension (N = 920) or with diabetes (N = 959). INTERVENTION: Participants in each 6-month trial were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 arms: (1) process incentives-earned by attending primary care visits and/or receiving prescription medication refills, (2) outcome incentives-earned by reducing systolic blood pressure (hypertension) or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; diabetes) levels, (3) combined process and outcome incentives, and (4) control (no incentives). MEASURES: Systolic blood pressure (hypertension) and HbA1c (diabetes) levels, primary care visits, and medication prescription refills. Analysis and Results: At 6 months, there were no statistically significant differences between intervention arms and the control arm in the change in systolic blood pressure, P = .531. Similarly, there were no significant differences in blood glucose control (HbA1c) between the intervention arms and control after 6 months, P = .939. The majority of participants had acceptable systolic blood pressure (<140 mm Hg) or blood glucose (<8.0%) levels at baseline and throughout the study. CONCLUSION: Financial incentives-regardless of whether they were delivered based on disease-relevant outcomes, process activities, or a combination of the two-have a negligible impact on health outcomes for Medicaid recipients diagnosed with either hypertension or diabetes in 2 studies in which, among other design and operational limitations, the majority of recipients had relatively well-controlled diseases at the time of enrollment.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To identify whether financial incentives promote improved disease management in Medicaid recipients diagnosed with hypertension or diabetes, respectively. DESIGN: Four-group, multicenter, randomized clinical trials. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2013 and 2016, New York State Medicaid managed care members diagnosed with hypertension (N = 920) or with diabetes (N = 959). INTERVENTION: Participants in each 6-month trial were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 arms: (1) process incentives-earned by attending primary care visits and/or receiving prescription medication refills, (2) outcome incentives-earned by reducing systolic blood pressure (hypertension) or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; diabetes) levels, (3) combined process and outcome incentives, and (4) control (no incentives). MEASURES: Systolic blood pressure (hypertension) and HbA1c (diabetes) levels, primary care visits, and medication prescription refills. Analysis and Results: At 6 months, there were no statistically significant differences between intervention arms and the control arm in the change in systolic blood pressure, P = .531. Similarly, there were no significant differences in blood glucose control (HbA1c) between the intervention arms and control after 6 months, P = .939. The majority of participants had acceptable systolic blood pressure (<140 mm Hg) or blood glucose (<8.0%) levels at baseline and throughout the study. CONCLUSION: Financial incentives-regardless of whether they were delivered based on disease-relevant outcomes, process activities, or a combination of the two-have a negligible impact on health outcomes for Medicaid recipients diagnosed with either hypertension or diabetes in 2 studies in which, among other design and operational limitations, the majority of recipients had relatively well-controlled diseases at the time of enrollment.
Authors: Jennifer Plebani Lussier; Sarah H Heil; Joan A Mongeon; Gary J Badger; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Addiction Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Paul A James; Suzanne Oparil; Barry L Carter; William C Cushman; Cheryl Dennison-Himmelfarb; Joel Handler; Daniel T Lackland; Michael L LeFevre; Thomas D MacKenzie; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Sandra J Taler; Raymond R Townsend; Jackson T Wright; Andrew S Narva; Eduardo Ortiz Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eric M VanEpps; Andrea B Troxel; Elizabeth Villamil; Kathryn A Saulsgiver; Jingsan Zhu; Jo-Yu Chin; Jacqueline Matson; Joseph Anarella; Patrick Roohan; Foster Gesten; Kevin G Volpp Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2018-07-18
Authors: Karen J Blumenthal; Kathryn A Saulsgiver; Laurie Norton; Andrea B Troxel; Joseph P Anarella; Foster C Gesten; Michael E Chernew; Kevin G Volpp Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Karen H Seal; Alex H Kral; Jennifer Lorvick; Alex McNees; Lauren Gee; Brian R Edlin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2003-08-20 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Martin F Shapiro; Suzanne B Shu; Noah J Goldstein; Ronald G Victor; Craig R Fox; Chi-Hong Tseng; Sitaram Vangala; Braden K Mogler; Stewart B Reed; Estivali Villa; José J Escarce Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Wafaa M El-Sadr; Geetha Beauchamp; H Irene Hall; Lucia V Torian; Barry S Zingman; Garret Lum; Richard A Elion; Kate Buchacz; David Burns; Allison Zerbe; Theresa Gamble; Deborah J Donnell Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731