| Literature DB >> 29389894 |
Yuan Zhang1, Jingyuan Li2, Huiying Lai3, Yuzhao Xu4.
Abstract
The corrosion behaviors ofEntities:
Keywords: TEM; biocompatibility; corrosion; homogenization; phases
Year: 2018 PMID: 29389894 PMCID: PMC5848924 DOI: 10.3390/ma11020227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of the experimental alloys (wt %).
| Experimental Alloys | Zn | Ca | Mn | Mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MZM | 2.12 | / | 0.20 | Bal. |
| MZM-0.38 Ca | 2.08 | 0.38 | 0.20 | Bal. |
| MZM-0.76 Ca | 2.11 | 0.76 | 0.20 | Bal. |
| MZM-1.10 Ca | 2.08 | 1.10 | 0.20 | Bal. |
Ion concentrations of Blood plasma and simulated body fluid [26,43].
| Solution | Concentrations (mM) | Buffer | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na+ | K+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | Cl− | HCO3− | HPO42− | SO42− | ||
| SBF | 142 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 147.8 | 4.20 | 1.0 | 0.5 | Tris |
| Blood Plasma | 142 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 2.1–2.6 | 95–107 | 27 | 0.7–1.5 | 0.5 | - |
Figure 1SEM morphologies of as-receive MZM-xCa alloys with homogenization treatment: (a) 0%; (b) 0.38%; (c) 0.76%; and (d) 1.10%.
Figure 2The elements distribution of samples with homogenization treatment: (a) MZM; (b) MZM-0.38% Ca; (c) MZM-0.76% Ca; and (d) MZM-1.10% Ca.
Figure 3X-ray diffractions patterns of: (a) as-cast MZM-xCa alloys; and (b) homogenization state; and (c) JmatPro calculations results for the microstructure transformation of MZM-1.10% Ca alloy depending on temperature.
Figure 4(a,b) Typical TEM phase features of as-studied MZM-1.10% Ca alloys; (c) TEM phase; (d) high resolution morphology; and (e) element distributions of Ca2Mg6Zn3 marked in (c); (f) TEM phase; (g) selected area diffraction patters; and (h) EDS analysis of Mg2Ca phase marked in (f).
Figure 5Electrochemical behaviors of MZM-xCa alloys in a simulated body fluid: (a) polarization curves; (b) nyquist plots; (c) bode plots of |Z| vs. frequency; and (d) bode plots of phase angle vs. frequency.
Result of the electrochemical polarization tests in SBF solution.
| Alloys | Ecorr (VSCE) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MZM | −1.63 | 289.93 | 6.62 |
| MZM-0.38 Ca | −1.576 | 274.41 | 6.27 |
| MZM-0.76 Ca | −1.67 | 356.20 | 8.14 |
| MZM-1.1 Ca | −1.752 | 400.31 | 9.15 |
Figure 6SEM micrographs of corrode surface after immersion test: (a) MZM; (b) MZM-0.38% Ca; (c) MZM-0.76% Ca; and (d) MZM-1.10% Ca.
Figure 7Elements distribution of corrosion products for MZM-1.10% Ca alloys: (a) SEM morphologies; and (b) main solute elements distribution.
Figure 8XRD and XPS spectrum of corrosion products of MZM-xCa alloys: (a) XRD; and (b) XPS.
Figure 93D corrosion morphology of MZM-xCa alloys with homogenization treatment: (a) 0%; (b) 0.38%; (c) 0.76%; and (d) 1.10%.
Measurements related to corrosion rate in simulated body fluid at 37 °C.
| Alloys | Ecorr (V) | ΔWm (mg/cm2/d) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MZM | 289.9 | 6.61 | −1.63 | 6.95 | 14.59 |
| MZM-0.38 Ca | 274.4 | 6.27 | −1.58 | 5.62 | 11.80 |
| MZM-0.76 Ca | 356.2 | 8.14 | −1.67 | 8.87 | 18.63 |
| MZM-1.1 Ca | 400.3 | 9.14 | −1.75 | 11.18 | 23.47 |
Figure 10pH value of the studied alloys during the immersion test in Kokubo solution.
Figure 11The BMSCs viability in negative control and MZM-xCa alloys extractions after one, two and three days of culture. (a) MZM; (b) MZM-0.38% Ca; (c) MZM-0.76% Ca; and (d) MZM-1.10% Ca.
Figure 12Optical microscopy of BMSCs after three days of incubation: (a) negative control; (b) MZM extracts; (c) MZM-0.38 Ca extracts; (d) MZM-0.76 Ca extracts; and (e) MZM-1.10 Ca extracts. All the scale bar represents 20 µm.
Figure 13Surface Volta potential distribution of MZM-xCa. (a) 0%; (b) 0.38%; (c) 0.76%; and (d) 1.10%.
Figure 14Preferential corrosion areas and morphologies were detected by SEM.
Figure 15Schematic illustration of corrosion mechanism of as-studied alloys in the Kokubo solution.