| Literature DB >> 28774000 |
Pavel Doležal1, Josef Zapletal2, Stanislava Fintová3, Zuzanka Trojanová4, Miroslav Greger5, Pavla Roupcová6,7, Tomáš Podrábský8.
Abstract
New Mg-3Zn-2Ca magnesium alloy was prepared using different processing techniques: gravity casting as well as squeeze casting in liquid and semisolid states. Materials were further thermally treated; thermal treatment of the gravity cast alloy was additionally combined with the equal channel angular pressing (ECAP). Alloy processed by the squeeze casting in liquid as well as in semisolid state exhibit improved plasticity; the ECAP processing positively influenced both the tensile and compressive characteristics of the alloy. Applied heat treatment influenced the distribution and chemical composition of present intermetallic phases. Influence of particular processing techniques, heat treatment, and intermetallic phase distribution is thoroughly discussed in relation to mechanical behavior of presented alloys.Entities:
Keywords: ECAP processing; Mg-Zn-Ca; biodegradable magnesium alloy; mechanical properties; microstructure; squeeze casting
Year: 2016 PMID: 28774000 PMCID: PMC5457187 DOI: 10.3390/ma9110880
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Microstructure of the GC alloy: (a) as-cast; (b) secondary phases in the as-cast state; (c) GC + HT; (d) secondary phases in GC + HT state depicted in the SEM–BSE mode.
Average grain size of the alloy processed by various methods.
| Processing Method | GC | SCL | SCS | ECAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| average grain size (μm) | 40.7 ± 5.9 | 9.6 ± 0.7 | bimodal | 84.3 ± 0.3 ECAP direction |
Chemical composition of the alloy processed by various methods.
| Alloy State | Phase | Element (wt %) | Element (at %) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mg | Ca | Zn | Mg | Ca | Zn | ||
| hcp Mg | 98.3 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 99.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | |
| Mg2Ca | 70.0 | 24.8 | 5.1 | 80.3 | 17.4 | 2.2 | |
| Ca2Mg6Zn3 | 62.9 | 10.5 | 26.6 | 79.4 | 8.1 | 12.5 | |
| hcp Mg | 97.3 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 98.9 | 0.3 | 0.8 | |
| Mg2Ca | 56.8 | 37.9 | 5.3 | 69.5 | 28.1 | 2.4 | |
| Ca2Mg6Zn3 | 71.3 | 7.2 | 21.6 | 85.2 | 5.2 | 9.6 | |
| hcp Mg | 98.7 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 99.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | |
| Mg2Ca | 80.0 | 15.2 | 4.8 | 87.9 | 10.1 | 1.9 | |
| Ca2Mg6Zn3 | 66.2 | 11.2 | 22.6 | 81.3 | 8.3 | 10.5 | |
| hcp Mg | 97.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 99.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | |
| Mg2Ca | 59.1 | 36.3 | 4.6 | 71.4 | 26.6 | 2.1 | |
| Ca2Mg6Zn3 | 72.0 | 8.6 | 19.4 | 85.3 | 6.2 | 8.5 | |
| hcp Mg | 99.1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 99.6 | 00.1 | 0.3 | |
| Mg2Ca | 75.0 | 19.1 | 6.0 | 84.5 | 13.0 | 2.5 | |
| Ca2Mg6Zn3 | 62.7 | 11.4 | 26.0 | 79.0 | 8.7 | 12.2 | |
| hcp Mg | 97.7 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 99.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | |
| Mg2Ca | 57.9 | 36.9 | 5.2 | 70.4 | 27.3 | 2.4 | |
| Ca2Mg6Zn3 | not present in the microstructure | not present in the microstructure | |||||
Figure 2Microstructure of SCL sample: (a) SCL state; (b) secondary phases in the SCL state; (c) SCL + HT; (d) secondary phases in SCL + HT depicted in the SEM–BSE mode.
Figure 3Microstructure of the SCS sample: (a) SCS state; (b) secondary phases in SCS; (c) SCS + HT; (d) secondary phases in SCS + HT state depicted in the SEM–BSE mode.
Figure 4Microstructure of the ECAPed alloy: (a) ECAPed state; (b) secondary phases in the ECAPed state; (c) HT + ECAP; (d) secondary phases in HT + ECAP state depicted in the SEM–BSE mode.
Figure 5X-ray pattern of Mg-3Zn-2Ca magnesium alloy processed by different methods.
Figure 6True stress–true strain curves obtained for GC alloy in tension (T) and compression (C). Due to very low ductility of the GC alloy in tension, the curve is introduced in the insert.
Mechanical characteristics of the Mg-3Zn-2Ca alloy processed by different methods obtained in tension: yield stress, σ02, ultimate tensile strength, σUTS, and strain to fracture, e.
| Alloy State | σ02 (MPa) | σUTS (MPa) | e (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GC | 89.8 | 101.0 | 0.4 |
| GC + HT | 87.8 | 126.0 | 2.0 |
| SCL | 79.7 | 134.8 | 0.9 |
| SCL + HT | 74.2 | 144.1 | 3.3 |
| SCS | 67.0 | 110.6 | 1.2 |
| SCS + HT | 67.6 | 133.5 | 4.4 |
| ECAP | 166.1 | 206.4 | 1.1 |
| HT + ECAP | 173.5 | 223.0 | 2.4 |
Mechanical characteristics of Mg-3Zn-2Ca alloy processed by different methods obtained in compression: yield stress, σ02, ultimate compression strength, σUCS, and strain to fracture, εB.
| Alloy State | σ02 (MPa) | σUCS (MPa) | εB (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GC | 83.4 | 234.6 | 15.5 |
| GC + HT | 80.1 | 334.9 | 13.7 |
| SCL | 84.5 | 243.2 | 15.2 |
| SCL + HT | 85.3 | 273.2 | 15.0 |
| SCS | 71.2 | 219.5 | 18.4 |
| SCS + HT | 73.4 | 220.2 | 18.3 |
| ECAP | 119.6 | 296.8 | 10.8 |
| HT + ECAP | 131.6 | 299.6 | 9.7 |
Figure 7True stress–true strain curves obtained for SCL alloy in tension (T) and compression (C). Due to very low ductility of the as cast alloy in tension, the curve is introduced in the insert.
Figure 8True stress–true strain curves obtained for SCS alloy in tension (T) and compression (C). Serrated flow estimated in compression is obvious from the insert.
Figure 9True stress–true strain curves obtained for ECAPed alloy and HT + ECAPed alloy in tension (T) and compression (C).
Figure 10Serrated flow estimated for the ECAPed alloy during deformation in compression.