Literature DB >> 29389302

Commentary on Bowe et al, "The State of the Otolaryngology Match: A Review of Applicant Trends, 'Impossible' Qualifications, and Implications".

Vidur Bhalla1, Kevin J Sykes1, Shannon M Kraft1, Alexander G Chiu1.   

Abstract

An objective evidence-based review of the metrics used to evaluate applicants entering our field ultimately found these figures to have upward trends without any major correlation to performance in residency. The rise of these metrics coincides with a yearly drop in senior applicants, and in 2017, nearly 10% of programs did not match their contingent. The causes of unmatched spots must be examined to ensure that the field of otolaryngology can continue to grow and attract medical students who will excel in our field. Considerations into revising the applicant selection process, early introduction and mentorship within the otolaryngology field, and changes to the current otolaryngology interview process are discussed.

Keywords:  applicants; interview; medical student; metrics; otolaryngology; residency; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29389302     DOI: 10.1177/0194599817737277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  2 in total

Review 1.  Systems-Level Reforms to the US Resident Selection Process: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ryley K Zastrow; Jesse Burk-Rafel; Daniel A London
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

2.  Using Computer-Assisted Instruction to Increase Otolaryngology Education During Medical School.

Authors:  Margaret C Michel; Arielle Thal; Andrew D Sparks; Philip E Zapanta
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2021-01-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.