Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common upper extremity fractures in adults. This study seeks to elucidate the impact age, fracture type, and patient comorbidities have on the current treatment of DRFs and risk of complications. We hypothesized that comorbidities rather than age would relate to the risk of complications in the treatment of DRFs. Methods: A retrospective review of data was performed for patients treated between 2007 and 2014 using Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases. Patients who sustained a DRF were separated into "closed" versus "open" treatment groups, and the association between patient demographics, treatment type, and comorbidities with complication rates was analyzed, along with the trend of treatment modalities throughout the study time interval. Results: In total, 155 353 DRFs were identified; closed treatment predominated in all age groups with the highest percentage of open treatment occurring in the 50- to 59-year age group. Between 2007 and 2014, there was an increase in the rate of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in all age groups <90 with the largest increase (11%) occurring in the 70- to 79-year age group. Higher complication rates were observed in the open treatment group in all ages <90 years with a trend toward decreasing complication rates as age increased. Comorbidities were more strongly associated with the risk of developing complications than age. Conclusions: Closed treatment of DRFs remains the predominant treatment method among all age groups, but DRFs are increasingly being treated with ORIF. Emphasis on the patients' comorbidities rather than chronological age should be considered in the treatment decision-making process of elderly patients with DRFs.
Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common upper extremity fractures in adults. This study seeks to elucidate the impact age, fracture type, and patient comorbidities have on the current treatment of DRFs and risk of complications. We hypothesized that comorbidities rather than age would relate to the risk of complications in the treatment of DRFs. Methods: A retrospective review of data was performed for patients treated between 2007 and 2014 using Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases. Patients who sustained a DRF were separated into "closed" versus "open" treatment groups, and the association between patient demographics, treatment type, and comorbidities with complication rates was analyzed, along with the trend of treatment modalities throughout the study time interval. Results: In total, 155 353 DRFs were identified; closed treatment predominated in all age groups with the highest percentage of open treatment occurring in the 50- to 59-year age group. Between 2007 and 2014, there was an increase in the rate of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in all age groups <90 with the largest increase (11%) occurring in the 70- to 79-year age group. Higher complication rates were observed in the open treatment group in all ages <90 years with a trend toward decreasing complication rates as age increased. Comorbidities were more strongly associated with the risk of developing complications than age. Conclusions: Closed treatment of DRFs remains the predominant treatment method among all age groups, but DRFs are increasingly being treated with ORIF. Emphasis on the patients' comorbidities rather than chronological age should be considered in the treatment decision-making process of elderly patients with DRFs.
Authors: Cameron W Schick; Daniel M Koehler; Christopher T Martin; Yubo Gao; Andrew J Pugely; Apurva Shah; Brian D Adams Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Jeremie Larouche; Jeffrey Pike; Gerard P Slobogean; Pierre Guy; Henry Broekhuyse; Peter OʼBrien; Kelly A Lefaivre Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: O O Babatunde; M Bucknall; C Burton; J J Forsyth; N Corp; S Gwilym; Z Paskins; D A van der Windt Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Richard M McEntee; William L Wang; Alexander J Rondon; Jacob E Tulipan; Kevin F Lutsky; Lili E Schindelar; Jonas L Matzon; Pedro K Beredjiklian Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2020-10-19
Authors: Viktor Schmidt; Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro; Marcus Ottosson; Magnus Tägil; Albert Christersson; Markus Engquist; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Sebastian Mukka; Mats Wadsten Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 3.240