S Lombardo1,2, B Unurbileg3, J Gerelmaa3, L Bayarbaatar3, E Sarnai3, R Price4,5. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. sarah.lombardo@hsc.utah.edu. 2. Center for Global Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. sarah.lombardo@hsc.utah.edu. 3. Department of Surgery, Mongolia National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. 4. Center for Global Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 5. Department of Surgery, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Injury is the third leading cause of death in Mongolia, with a 29% increase in motor vehicle fatalities over the past decade. Half of the population lives outside the urbanized capital of Ulaanbaatar, where access to care is limited. This study evaluates and describes the Mongolian trauma system and makes recommendations for improvements. METHODS: Hospital-level data were collected, and an International Assessment of Capacity for Trauma (INTACT) score (0-10) was calculated. INTACT is a validated measure for evaluating trauma capacity in developing countries based on resource availability; a score of 10 reflects ideal staffing and equipment. The survey was administered to key staff members at 10 rural and urban hospitals in spring 2016. INTACT scores were calculated for each hospital and compared to expected INTACT scores based on the World Health Organization Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care (GETC). RESULTS: Ulaanbaatar enjoys a centralized prehospital transportation service and two appropriately resourced tertiary hospitals. Rural Mongolians rely upon regionally located tertiary facilities with similar capabilities. INTACT scores for secondary-level hospitals (n = 2) failed to meet expected GETC minimums, as did 2 of 4 primary facilities. There are no national standards guiding prehospital care, triage, or transfer. No outpatient rehabilitation facilities exist within Mongolia. CONCLUSION: The Mongolian trauma system utilizes regionalized care to provide emergency services. Among surveyed hospitals, 60% met GETC standards. Areas for improvement include increased resourcing of primary and secondary facilities, development of rural prehospital systems, adoption of universal standards for patient care, and creation of post-acute rehabilitation facilities.
INTRODUCTION: Injury is the third leading cause of death in Mongolia, with a 29% increase in motor vehicle fatalities over the past decade. Half of the population lives outside the urbanized capital of Ulaanbaatar, where access to care is limited. This study evaluates and describes the Mongolian trauma system and makes recommendations for improvements. METHODS: Hospital-level data were collected, and an International Assessment of Capacity for Trauma (INTACT) score (0-10) was calculated. INTACT is a validated measure for evaluating trauma capacity in developing countries based on resource availability; a score of 10 reflects ideal staffing and equipment. The survey was administered to key staff members at 10 rural and urban hospitals in spring 2016. INTACT scores were calculated for each hospital and compared to expected INTACT scores based on the World Health Organization Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care (GETC). RESULTS: Ulaanbaatar enjoys a centralized prehospital transportation service and two appropriately resourced tertiary hospitals. Rural Mongolians rely upon regionally located tertiary facilities with similar capabilities. INTACT scores for secondary-level hospitals (n = 2) failed to meet expected GETC minimums, as did 2 of 4 primary facilities. There are no national standards guiding prehospital care, triage, or transfer. No outpatient rehabilitation facilities exist within Mongolia. CONCLUSION: The Mongolian trauma system utilizes regionalized care to provide emergency services. Among surveyed hospitals, 60% met GETC standards. Areas for improvement include increased resourcing of primary and secondary facilities, development of rural prehospital systems, adoption of universal standards for patient care, and creation of post-acute rehabilitation facilities.
Authors: Belinda J Gabbe; Grad Dip Biostat; Fiona E Lecky; Omar Bouamra; Maralyn Woodford; Tom Jenks; Timothy J Coats; Peter A Cameron Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: S J Gerndt; J L Conley; M J Lowell; J Holmes; E Marsh; L R Larin; P A Taheri; T Z Polley; J L Rodriquez Journal: Surgery Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Evan G Wong; Shailvi Gupta; Dan L Deckelbaum; Tarek Razek; Thaim B Kamara; Benedict C Nwomeh; Adil H Haider; Adam L Kushner Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Meera Kotagal; Kiran J Agarwal-Harding; Charles Mock; Robert Quansah; Carlos Arreola-Risa; John G Meara Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John Whitaker; Nollaig O'Donohoe; Max Denning; Dan Poenaru; Elena Guadagno; Andrew J M Leather; Justine I Davies Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2021-05
Authors: Jade M Nunez; Jonathan Nellermoe; Andrea Davis; Simon Ruhnke; Battsetseg Gonchigjav; Nomindari Bat-Erdene; Anudari Zorigtbaatar; Ali Jalali; Kevin Bagley; Micah Katz; Hannah Pioli; Batsaikhan Bat-Erdene; Sarnai Erdene; Sergelen Orgoi; Raymond R Price; Ganbold Lundeg Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 3.006