Literature DB >> 29387922

Accuracy and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy in the diagnosis of focal lesions in the salivary glands.

Jose Luis Del Cura1,2, Gloria Coronado3, Rosa Zabala4, Igone Korta4, Ignacio López5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy (CNB) in the diagnosis of salivary gland tumours (SGT).
METHODS: Retrospective, institutional review board approved, analysis of the CNB of SGT performed at our centre in 8 years. We used an automatic 18-G spring-loaded device. The final diagnosis was based on surgery in the cases that were operated on, and on clinical evolution and biopsy findings in the rest.
RESULTS: Four hundred and nine biopsies were performed in 381 patients (ages, 2-97 years; mean, 55.9). There were two minor complications. Biopsy was diagnostic in 98.3%. There were eight false negatives. The diagnostic values for malignancy were: sensitivity 89.6%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) 98%. For the detection of neoplasms were: sensitivity 98.7%, specificity 99%, PPV 99.7% and VPN 96.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy of CNB in SGT is very high, with a very high sensitivity and an absolutely reliable diagnosis of malignancy. Complication rate is very low. It should be considered the technique of choice when a STG is detected. Normal tissue results warrant repeating biopsy. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound-guided core-biopsy is the technique of choice in salivary glands nodules • Sensitivity, specificity for detecting neoplasms (which should be resected) are around 99% • Diagnosis of malignancy in core-biopsy is absolutely reliable • A CNB result of "normal tissue", however, warrants repeating the biopsy • Complication rate is very low.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy, large-core needle; Image-guided biopsy; Salivary gland neoplasms; Salivary glands; Ultrasonography, interventional

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29387922     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5295-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  28 in total

1.  Diagnosing common parotid tumours with magnetic resonance imaging including diffusion-weighted imaging vs fine-needle aspiration cytology: a comparative study.

Authors:  H Yerli; E Aydin; N Haberal; A Harman; T Kaskati; S Alibek
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  US-guided fine-needle aspiration of major salivary gland masses and adjacent lymph nodes: accuracy and impact on clinical decision making.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Alexander S Jung; Dennis R Maceri; Dale H Rice; Sue Ellen Martin; Edward G Grant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Biopsy of parotid masses: Review of current techniques.

Authors:  Sananda Haldar; Joseph D Sinnott; Kemal M Tekeli; Samuel S Turner; David C Howlett
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

4.  Incidence rates of salivary gland tumors: results from a population-based study.

Authors:  J A Pinkston; P Cole
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Interest of diffusion-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR sequences for the diagnosis of parotid gland tumors.

Authors:  J Lechner Goyault; S Riehm; A Neuville; A Gentine; F Veillon
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.447

Review 6.  Role of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy in the assessment of head and neck lesions: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Eva Novoa; Nicolas Gürtler; André Arnoux; Marcel Kraft
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Distinguishing benign from malignant parotid gland tumours: low-dose multi-phasic CT protocol with 5-minute delay.

Authors:  G Q Jin; D K Su; D Xie; W Zhao; L D Liu; X N Zhu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance for detecting malignancy and for the tissue-specific diagnosis of salivary gland tumors.

Authors:  H-J Eom; J H Lee; M-S Ko; Y J Choi; R G Yoon; K J Cho; S Y Nam; J H Baek
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  [Ultrasound of the salivary glands].

Authors:  N Gritzmann
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 1.057

Review 10.  Comparison of ultrasound-guided core biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of salivary gland lesions.

Authors:  Nicholas J Douville; Carol R Bradford
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.147

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound-guided core biopsy in the diagnosis of parotid neoplasia: an overview and update with a review of the literature.

Authors:  Katharine Julia Hurry; Dilhara Karunaratne; Suzanne Westley; Alessandra Booth; Keith C R B Ramesar; Ting Ting Zhang; Michael Williams; David C Howlett
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Warthin's tumor with necrotizing tuberculous granulomatous inflammation causing severe facial nerve adhesion in parotid gland: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Shih-Lung Chen; Cheng-Cheng Hwang; Yu-Chih Liu; Wei-Ting Chen; Shih-Wei Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.