Importance: Epidermal cell suspension (ECS) and follicular cell suspension (FCS) are successful surgical modalities for the treatment of stable vitiligo. However, repigmentation in generalized and acrofacial vitiligo and over acral or bony sites (eg, elbows, knees, iliac crests, and malleoli), which are difficult to treat, is challenging. Objective: To study the efficacy of transplanting a combination of autologous, noncultured ECS and FCS (ECS + FCS) compared with ECS alone in stable vitiligo. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective, observer-blinded, active-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, with treatment administered as an outpatient procedure. Thirty participants who had stable vitiligo with symmetrical lesions were recruited between October 18, 2013, and October 28, 2016. All of the lesions were resistant to medical modalities with minimum lesional stability of 1 year. Intent-to-treat analysis was used. Interventions: ECS + FCS was prepared by mixing equal amounts (in cell number) of FCS with ECS. After manual dermabrasion, ECS was applied to 1 lesion and ECS + FCS was applied to the anatomically based paired lesion of the same patient. No adjuvant treatment was given. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients were followed up at 4, 8, and 16 weeks by a blinded observer and extent of repigmentation, color match, pattern of repigmentation, patient satisfaction and complications were noted. Both the visual and the computerized image analysis methods were used for outcome assessment. Cell suspensions were assessed post hoc for OCT4+ stem cell counts using flow cytometry; expression of stem cell factor and basic fibroblast growth factor was evaluated using quantitative relative messenger RNA expression. Results: Of the 30 patients included in the study, 18 (60%) were women; mean (SD) age was 23.4 (6.4) years. Seventy-four percent of the lesions (62 of 84) were difficult-to-treat vitiligo. ECS + FCS showed superior repigmentation outcomes compared with ECS: extent (76% vs 57%, P < .001), rapidity (48% vs 31%, P = .001), color match (73% vs 61%, P < .001), and patient satisfaction (mean [SD] patient global assessment score, 23.30 [6.89] vs 20.81 [6.61], P = .047). Melanocyte stem cell counts (2% in ECS + FCS vs 0.5% in ECS) as well as expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (11.8-fold) and stem cell factor (6.0-fold) were higher in ECS + FCS suspension (P<.05 for both). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings from this study establish ECS + FCS as a novel approach in vitiligo surgery for attaining good to excellent repigmentation in a short period with good color match, even in difficult-to-treat vitiligo. Trial Registration: ctri.nic.in Identifier: CTRI/2017/05/008692.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Epidermal cell suspension (ECS) and follicular cell suspension (FCS) are successful surgical modalities for the treatment of stable vitiligo. However, repigmentation in generalized and acrofacial vitiligo and over acral or bony sites (eg, elbows, knees, iliac crests, and malleoli), which are difficult to treat, is challenging. Objective: To study the efficacy of transplanting a combination of autologous, noncultured ECS and FCS (ECS + FCS) compared with ECS alone in stable vitiligo. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective, observer-blinded, active-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, with treatment administered as an outpatient procedure. Thirty participants who had stable vitiligo with symmetrical lesions were recruited between October 18, 2013, and October 28, 2016. All of the lesions were resistant to medical modalities with minimum lesional stability of 1 year. Intent-to-treat analysis was used. Interventions: ECS + FCS was prepared by mixing equal amounts (in cell number) of FCS with ECS. After manual dermabrasion, ECS was applied to 1 lesion and ECS + FCS was applied to the anatomically based paired lesion of the same patient. No adjuvant treatment was given. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients were followed up at 4, 8, and 16 weeks by a blinded observer and extent of repigmentation, color match, pattern of repigmentation, patient satisfaction and complications were noted. Both the visual and the computerized image analysis methods were used for outcome assessment. Cell suspensions were assessed post hoc for OCT4+ stem cell counts using flow cytometry; expression of stem cell factor and basic fibroblast growth factor was evaluated using quantitative relative messenger RNA expression. Results: Of the 30 patients included in the study, 18 (60%) were women; mean (SD) age was 23.4 (6.4) years. Seventy-four percent of the lesions (62 of 84) were difficult-to-treat vitiligo. ECS + FCS showed superior repigmentation outcomes compared with ECS: extent (76% vs 57%, P < .001), rapidity (48% vs 31%, P = .001), color match (73% vs 61%, P < .001), and patient satisfaction (mean [SD] patient global assessment score, 23.30 [6.89] vs 20.81 [6.61], P = .047). Melanocyte stem cell counts (2% in ECS + FCS vs 0.5% in ECS) as well as expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (11.8-fold) and stem cell factor (6.0-fold) were higher in ECS + FCS suspension (P<.05 for both). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings from this study establish ECS + FCS as a novel approach in vitiligo surgery for attaining good to excellent repigmentation in a short period with good color match, even in difficult-to-treat vitiligo. Trial Registration: ctri.nic.in Identifier: CTRI/2017/05/008692.
Authors: B M El-Zawahry; N S Zaki; D A Bassiouny; R M Sobhi; A Zaghloul; M M Khorshied; H M Gouda Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2010-06-21 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: S M Esmat; A M El-Tawdy; G A Hafez; O A Zeid; D M Abdel Halim; M A Saleh; T M Leheta; M Elmofty Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: A Rao; S Gupta; A K Dinda; A Sharma; V K Sharma; G Kumar; D K Mitra; C K Prashant; G Singh Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: S E Uitentuis; M W Bekkenk; N van Geel; M A de Rie; A Wolkerstorfer Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: V S Narayan; L L C van den Bol; N van Geel; M W Bekkenk; R M Luiten; A Wolkerstorfer Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 6.166