| Literature DB >> 29387571 |
Majid Hajifaraji1, Mohammad Matlabi2, Farihe Ahmadzadeh-Sani3, Yadollah Mehrabi4, Mohammad Salem Rezaee5, Homa Hajimehdipour6, Abbas Hasanzadeh7, Katayoun Roghani8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Dyslipidemia has been considered as a major risk factor for coronary heart disease. Alternative medicine has a significant role in treatment of dyslipidemia. There are controversial findings regarding the effects of sour tea on dyslipidemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of aqueous extract of dried calyx of sour tea on polygenic dyslipidemia.Entities:
Keywords: Hibiscus sabdariffa L.; Lipid profile; Polygenic dyslipidemia; Sour tea
Year: 2018 PMID: 29387571 PMCID: PMC5787994
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Comparison of quantitative variables between two groups before initiation of the trial.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 49.04±8.26 | 47.76± 8.09 | 0.61 |
|
| 27.80±4.21 | 27.61±4.14 | 0.88 |
|
| 27.27±36.47 | 29.24±37.05 | 0.86 |
|
| 1504.5±1339.9 | 723.7± 384.4 | 0.01 |
|
| 229.0±5.2 | 246.4±7.1 | 0.04 |
|
| 181.0±13.9 | 188.0±13.2 | 0.80 |
|
| 43.4±1.7 | 43.8±1.29 | 0.75 |
|
| 148.9±4.9 | 165.2±6.2 | 0.04 |
|
| 3.49±.12 | 3.82±.17 | 0.13 |
p≤0.05
Comparison of mean and standard deviation values of daily nutrient intake between the two groups at baseline.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2106.7±587.9 | 2123.5±583.5 | 0.92 |
|
| 56.25±19.51 | 56.75±17.14 | 0.93 |
|
| 336.31±125.58 | 330.73±100.25 | 0.87 |
|
| 69.59±14.61 | 73.48±23.85 | 0.52 |
|
| 198.75±64.14 | 207.21±104.79 | 0.75 |
|
| 22.59±6.33 | 26.87±10.20 | 0.10 |
|
| 27.77±11.78 | 25.47±9.24 | 0.48 |
|
| 10.18±1.53 | 10.43±2.20 | 0.67 |
|
| 60.23±6.46 | 59.62±5.85 | 0.52 |
|
| 29.54±6.81 | 29.81±5.30 | 0.89 |
Consumption of food in two groups before and after intervention
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 0.87 | 0.87 | (50) 10 | (52.4) 11 | .870 | (47.6) 10 | (50) 11 | Hydrogenated oil |
| 0.2 | 0.73 | (90) 18 | (85.7) 18 | .730 | (85.7) 18 | (81.8) 18 | Animal oil |
| .860 | .090 | (55) 11 | (80.9) 17 | .170 | (47.6) 10 | (68.2) 15 | Liquid oil |
| 0.4 | 0.66 | (65) 13 | (71.4) 15 | .440 | (66.7) 14 | (77.3) 17 | High-fat dairy |
| 0.68 | 0.02 | ٭(65) 13 | (28.6) 6 | .030 | ٭(81) 17 | (50) 11 | Sweets |
| 0.31 | 0.06 | (90) 18 | (47.6) 10 | .030 | ٭(85.7) 18 | (54.5) 12 | High-fat meat |
before and after intervention.
Mean and Standard Deviation Values of Lipid Profile during 12 Weeks of Intervention
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| 229.0±5.2 | 246.4±7.1٭ | 0.04 |
|
| 218.1±5.6 | 229.5±8.2 | 0.23 |
|
| 223.6±5.8 | 223.1 ±9.6 | 0.96 |
|
| -2.35 | -9.46٭ | |
|
| 0.50 | 0.03 | |
|
| |||
|
| 43.4±1.7 | 43.8±1.29 | 0.75 |
|
| 43.6±1.5 | 41.8±1.4 | 0.54 |
|
| 42.1±1.5 | 40.1 ±1.5 | 0.35 |
|
| -2.97 | -8.33٭ | |
|
| 0.27 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||
|
| 148.9±4.9 | 165.2±6.2٭ | 0.04 |
|
| 142.3±4.9 | 150.6±7.3 | 0.23 |
|
| 148.9±5.0 | 149.0 ±9.1 | 0.96 |
|
| -1.95 | -9.80٭ | |
|
| 0.90 | 0.03 | |
|
| |||
|
| 3.49±.12 | 3.82±.17 | 0.13 |
|
| 3.30±.12 | 3.65±.20 | 0.2 |
|
| 3.60±.16 | 3.76±.23 | 0.57 |
|
| +3.15 | -1.57 | |
|
| 0.02 | 0.39 | |
|
| |||
|
| 181.0±13.9 | 188.0±13.2 | 0.80 |
|
| 160.4±15.2 | 185.1±18.5 | 0.30 |
|
| 158.9±14.4 | 169.4±17.9 | 0.65 |
|
| -12.26 | -9.90 | |
|
| 0.11 | 0.31 | |
p≤.05