| Literature DB >> 29387418 |
Yuki Nagata1, Akiyoshi Hirayama2, Satsuki Ikeda2, Aoi Shirahata2, Futaba Shoji2, Midori Maruyama2, Mitsunori Kayano3, Masahiko Bundo4, Kotaro Hattori5, Sumiko Yoshida5, Yu-Ichi Goto5, Katsuya Urakami6, Tomoyoshi Soga2, Kouichi Ozaki1, Shumpei Niida1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a most common dementia in elderly people. Since AD symptoms resemble those of other neurodegenerative diseases, including idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), it is difficult to distinguish AD from iNPH for a precise and early diagnosis. iNPH is caused by the accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and involves gait disturbance, urinary incontinence, and dementia. iNPH is treatable with shunt operation which removes accumulated CSF from the brain ventricles.Entities:
Keywords: 2-hydroxybutyrate; Alzheimer’s disease; Cerebrospinal fluid; Diagnostic marker; Glycerate; Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; N-acetylneuraminate; Serine
Year: 2018 PMID: 29387418 PMCID: PMC5778653 DOI: 10.1186/s40364-018-0119-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomark Res ISSN: 2050-7771
Subject characteristics.
| Metabolomics | Validation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | iNPH | AD | iNPH | |
| Subject No. | 39 | 19 | 42 | 38 |
| Mean age (SD) | 73.5 (9.8) | 77.8 (4.5) | 74.1 (9.6) | 77.9 (5.6) |
| Age range | 47-86 | 70-86 | 47-86 | 57-87 |
| P-value | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||
| Male/female | 14/25 | 9/10 | 15/27 | 22/16 |
| P-value | 0.24 | 0.09 | ||
| Mean MMSE (SD) | 21.4 (5.1) | 23.5 (2.9) | 21.2 (5.0) | 22.1 (3.1) |
| P-value | 0.08 | 0.46 | ||
| Missing values | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Statistically significant metabolites between AD and iNPH in the metabolomics
| Mean concentration, μmol/L (SD) | Welch’s t-test | ROC | AD/iNPH | Valid value | Missing value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PubChem ID | Metabolite | AD | iNPH | AUC | Fold change | AD | iNPH | AD | iNPH | |||
| 752 | Glycerate | 60.61 | (30.94) | 26.23 | (6.22) | 6.E-07 | 0.88 | 2.31 | 32 | 16 | 7 | 3 |
| 1060 | Pyruvate | 45.22 | (13.45) | 68.34 | (12.95) | 1.E-04 | 0.89 | 0.66 | 12 | 16 | 27 | 3 |
| 3441 | 2-Oxoisopentanoate | 4.29 | (1.19) | 5.64 | (1.29) | 0.001 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 30 | 19 | 9 | 0 |
| 3568 | N-Acetylneuraminate | 16.75 | (3.89) | 13.35 | (3.2) | 0.001 | 0.76 | 1.25 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 617 | Serine | 24.63 | (3.9) | 30.12 | (6.15) | 0.002 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 273,260 | N-Acetylhistidinea | 1.19 | (0.88) | 0.88 | (0.92) | 0.002 | 0.72 | 1.36 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 8180 | Undecanoatea | 0.54 | (0.17) | 0.71 | (0.09) | 0.003 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 17 | 7 | 22 | 12 |
| 3,527,278 | 4-Methyl-2-oxopentanoate | 2.64 | (0.85) | 3.51 | (0.98) | 0.003 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 11,266 | 2-Hydroxybutyrate | 18.08 | (5.98) | 23.14 | (6.06) | 0.005 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 525 | Malate | 1.17 | (0.33) | 1.54 | (0.46) | 0.005 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 602 | Alanine | 32.03 | (8.53) | 42.82 | (14.42) | 0.006 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 876 | Methionine | 2.79 | (1.08) | 3.67 | (1.07) | 0.006 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 205 | Threonine | 27.56 | (6.43) | 34.81 | (9.53) | 0.006 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 232 | Arginine | 23.08 | (4.5) | 26.79 | (4.6) | 0.006 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 64,969 | 3-Methylhistidine | 1.12 | (0.88) | 1.81 | (0.92) | 0.010 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 1081 | Citramalate | 1.20 | (0.96) | 0.57 | (0.12) | 0.010 | 0.74 | 2.12 | 19 | 8 | 20 | 11 |
| 1175 | Urate | 20.84 | (11.36) | 30.61 | (15.74) | 0.023 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 866 | Lysine | 30.00 | (5.84) | 36.35 | (10.66) | 0.023 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
aUndecanoate and N-Acetylhistidine were excluded from further analysis
AD Alzheimer’s disease, iNPH idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, AUC area under the curve, ROC receiver operator characteristic
Statistically significant metabolites between AD and iNPH in the validation
| Mean concentration, μmol/L (SD) | Welch’s t-test | ROC | AD/iNPH | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolite | AD | iNPH | AUC | Fold change | |||
| Serine | 29.1 | (5.3) | 34.5 | (4.9) | 1.6E-04 | 0.78 | 0.84 |
| Glycerate | 54.6 | (22.2) | 37.3 | (12.9) | 2.0E-04 | 0.71 | 1.46 |
| 3-Methylhistidine | 1.1 | (0.9) | 2.1 | (1.2) | 6.4E-04 | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| Threonine | 29.0 | (7.0) | 39.4 | (12.9) | 7.4E-04 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| Methionine | 2.6 | (1.0) | 3.6 | (1.2) | 9.4E-04 | 0.77 | 0.71 |
| Urate | 19.9 | (8.6) | 28.7 | (9.9) | 1.3E-03 | 0.78 | 0.70 |
| N-Acetylneuraminate | 16.1 | (3.9) | 12.9 | (3.2) | 1.9E-03 | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Alanine | 33.0 | (8.4) | 42.4 | (12.6) | 3.9E-03 | 0.73 | 0.78 |
| 2-Hydroxybutyrate | 17.5 | (4.6) | 22.2 | (6.7) | 0.009 | 0.72 | 0.79 |
aBonferroni correction was applied
AD Alzheimer’s disease, iNPH idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, AUC area under the curve, ROC receiver operator characteristic
Fig. 1Statistically significant metabolites in the cerebrospinal fluid between Alzheimer’s disease and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Four metabolites were statistically significant in the multiple logistic regression analysis
Statistically significant metabolites in multiple logistic regression analysis
| Metabolite | Odds ratio | CI 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serine | 0.002 | 0.78 | 0.66-0.91 |
| Glycerate | 0.009 | 1.06 | 1.01-1.10 |
| N-Acetylneuraminate | 0.003 | 1.45 | 1.14-1.85 |
| 2-Hydroxybutyrate | 0.034 | 0.84 | 0.72-0.99 |
Age was used as a covariate
Fig. 2Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of statistically significant metabolites in the cerebrospinal fluid between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). ROC curve analysis was performed to compare the predictive power of AD and iNPH with the combined metabolites
Fig. 3Correlation diagram of p-tau versus the four metabolites. (a) serine, (b) glycerate, (c) Neu5Ac, and (d) 2-HB with regression lines are indicated
Fig. 4Correlation diagram of Aβ42 versus the four metabolites. (a) serine, (b) glycerate, (c) Neu5Ac, and (d) 2-HB with regression lines are indicated
Fig. 5Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of p-tau and Aβ42 in the cerebrospinal fluid between Alzheimer’s disease and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. ROC curve analysis was performed to compare the predictive power of p-tau (left) and Aβ42 (right)
Fig. 6A model of the relationship of Alzheimer’s disease-specific metabolites indicated in this study. Serine, glycerate, Neu5Ac, and 2-HB are depicted with the AD-related metabolites, phenomenon, structures and metabolic pathways. Metabolites detected in this study are indicated in green oval with bold letters. Other related metabolites are indicated in light green oval. Enzymes are indicated in light blue oval. The phenomena, structure and pathways known to participate with AD pathogenesis are indicated in square. Valid allows indicate the interactions previously reported. Dotted allows indicate predicted interactions. Red bold line indicates the brain and CSF boundary. 2-KB: 2-ketobutyrate; 2-HB: 2-hydroxybutyrate; AD: Alzheimer’s disease; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; NADPH: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; Neu5Ac: N-acetylneuraminate; PC: phosphatidylcholine; PE: phosphatidylethanolamine; PPP: pentose phosphate pathway; PSS: phosphatidylserine synthase