| Literature DB >> 29387368 |
Hamid Bakhshabadi1, HabibOllah Mirzaei1, Alireza Ghodsvali2, Seid Mahdi Jafari1, Aman Mohammad Ziaiifar1.
Abstract
Application of novel technologies such as microwave and pulsed electric fields (PEF) might increase the speed and efficiency of oil extraction. In the present research, PEF (3.25 kV/cm electric field intensity and 30 pulse number) and microwave (540 W for 180 s) pretreatments were used to study the process of oil extraction from black cumin (Nigella sativa) seeds. After applying the selected pretreatments, the oil of seeds was extracted with the use of a screw press and the extraction efficiency, refractive index, oil density, color index, oxidative stability, and chemical components of oil and protein of meal were evaluated. The achieved results expressed that PEF and microwave pretreatments increased the oil extraction efficiency and its oxidative stability. Different pretreatments didn't have any significant influence on the refractive index of black cumin seed oil (p>.05). When microwave and PEF were used, the oil density showed an enhancement as the following: 1.51% and 0.96%, respectively in comparison with the samples with no pretreatments. Evaluation of the extracted oils, using GC/MS analysis indicated that thymoquinone was the dominant phenolic component in the black cumin oil. Finally, the SEM analysis revealed that microwave and PEF can be useful in the extraction of oil from black cumin seeds since these treatments damaged cell walls and facilitated the oil extraction process.Entities:
Keywords: Black cumin seed; efficiency; microwave; oil extraction; oxidative stability; pulsed electric fields
Year: 2017 PMID: 29387368 PMCID: PMC5778200 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.535
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1The influence of various pretreatments on the efficiency of oil extraction process from black cumin seed
Figure 2SEM micrographs of the control sample (a), the treated sample with pulsed electric fields (b) and the treated sample with MW (c)
Figure 3The influence of various pretreatments on the refractive index of black cumin seed oil
Figure 4The influence of various pretreatments on the oil density of black cumin seed
Figure 5The influence of different pretreatments on the color index of black cumin seed oil
Figure 6The influence of different pretreatments on the oxidative stability of black cumin seed oil
Figure 7The influence of different pretreatments on the amount of protein in the meals of black cumin seed
The influence of different pretreatments on the chemical composition of black cumin seed oil
| Compound | Treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | MW | PEF | |
| Cymeme | 0.71c | 1.34b | 1.94a |
| Thymoquinone | 1.02c | 2.06b | 2.57a |
| Cyclopropanemethanol, α., 2‐di methyl‐2‐(4‐methyl‐3‐pentenyl) | 0.02b | 0.37a | 0.36a |
| 2‐Amino‐4,6‐dihydroxypyrimidine,N,O,O′‐tris(trifluoroacetyl) | 0.00c | 0.11a | 0.08b |
| Cyclohexanol | 0.35c | 1.30a | 1.10b |
| Chlorine compounds | 0.35c | 0.96a | 0.75b |
| β‐Pinene | 0.00c | 0.10b | 0.14a |
| D‐Limonene | 0.00c | 0.09b | 0.12a |
| Longifolene | 0.00c | 0.10b | 0.17a |
| γ‐Terpinene | 0.00b | 0.00b | 0.21a |
Numbers with different letters in each row imply significant differences in the 5% level of probability.
PEF, pulsed electric fields.