Literature DB >> 29386408

Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation of the lumbar and sacral spinal cord: a modelling study.

Sofia R Fernandes1, Ricardo Salvador, Cornelia Wenger, Mamede de Carvalho, Pedro C Miranda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to perform a computational study of the electric field (E-field) generated by transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) applied over the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spinal cord, in order to assess possible neuromodulatory effects on spinal cord circuitry related with lower limb functions. APPROACH: A realistic volume conductor model of the human body consisting of 14 tissues was obtained from available databases. Rubber pad electrodes with a metallic connector and a conductive gel layer were modelled. The finite element (FE) method was used to calculate the E-field when a current of 2.5 mA was passed between two electrodes. The main characteristics of the E-field distributions in the spinal grey matter (spinal-GM) and spinal white matter (spinal-WM) were compared for seven montages, with the anode placed either over T10, T8 or L2 spinous processes (s.p.), and the cathode placed over right deltoid (rD), umbilicus (U) and right iliac crest (rIC) areas or T8 s.p. Anisotropic conductivity of spinal-WM and of a group of dorsal muscles near the vertebral column was considered. MAIN
RESULTS: The average E-field magnitude was predicted to be above 0.15 V m-1 in spinal cord regions located between the electrodes. L2-T8 and T8-rIC montages resulted in the highest E-field magnitudes in lumbar and sacral spinal segments (>0.30 V m-1). E-field longitudinal component is 3 to 6 times higher than the ventral-dorsal and right-left components in both the spinal-GM and WM. Anatomical features such as CSF narrowing due to vertebrae bony edges or disks intrusions in the spinal canal correlate with local maxima positions. SIGNIFICANCE: Computational modelling studies can provide detailed information regarding the electric field in the spinal cord during tsDCS. They are important to guide the design of clinical tsDCS protocols that optimize stimulation of application-specific spinal targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29386408     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaac38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  3 in total

1.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) does not affect postural sway of young and healthy subjects during quiet upright standing.

Authors:  Felipe Fava de Lima; Cristiano Rocha Silva; Andre Fabio Kohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Cervical trans-spinal direct current stimulation: a modelling-experimental approach.

Authors:  Sofia Rita Fernandes; Mariana Pereira; Ricardo Salvador; Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda; Mamede de Carvalho
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases corticospinal transmission and enhances voluntary motor output in humans.

Authors:  Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Mikkel M Beck; Eva R Therkildsen; Christian Svane; Christian Forman; Jakob Lorentzen; Bernard A Conway; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen; Svend S Geertsen; Jens B Nielsen
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.