Literature DB >> 29386249

Precision Medicine in Type 2 Diabetes: Clinical Markers of Insulin Resistance Are Associated With Altered Short- and Long-term Glycemic Response to DPP-4 Inhibitor Therapy.

John M Dennis1, Beverley M Shields2, Anita V Hill2, Bridget A Knight2, Timothy J McDonald2,3, Lauren R Rodgers1, Michael N Weedon4, William E Henley1, Naveed Sattar5, Rury R Holman6, Ewan R Pearson7, Andrew T Hattersley2, Angus G Jones8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A precision approach to type 2 diabetes therapy would aim to target treatment according to patient characteristics. We examined if measures of insulin resistance and secretion were associated with glycemic response to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated whether markers of insulin resistance and insulin secretion were associated with 6-month glycemic response in a prospective study of noninsulin-treated participants starting DPP-4 inhibitor therapy (Predicting Response to Incretin Based Agents [PRIBA] study; n = 254), with replication for routinely available markers in U.K. electronic health care records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink [CPRD]; n = 23,001). In CPRD, we evaluated associations between baseline markers and 3-year durability of response. To test the specificity of findings, we repeated analyses for glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (PRIBA, n = 339; CPRD, n = 4,464).
RESULTS: In PRIBA, markers of higher insulin resistance (higher fasting C-peptide [P = 0.03], HOMA2 insulin resistance [P = 0.01], and triglycerides [P < 0.01]) were associated with reduced 6-month HbA1c response to DPP-4 inhibitors. In CPRD, higher triglycerides and BMI were associated with reduced HbA1c response (both P < 0.01). A subgroup defined by obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and high triglycerides (≥2.3 mmol/L) had reduced 6-month response in both data sets (PRIBA HbA1c reduction 5.3 [95% CI 1.8, 8.6] mmol/mol [0.5%] [obese and high triglycerides] vs. 11.3 [8.4, 14.1] mmol/mol [1.0%] [nonobese and normal triglycerides]; P = 0.01). In CPRD, the obese, high- triglycerides subgroup also had less durable response (hazard ratio 1.28 [1.16, 1.41]; P < 0.001). There was no association between markers of insulin resistance and response to GLP-1 receptor agonists.
CONCLUSIONS: Markers of higher insulin resistance are consistently associated with reduced glycemic response to DPP-4 inhibitors. This finding provides a starting point for the application of a precision diabetes approach to DPP-4 inhibitor therapy.
© 2018 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29386249      PMCID: PMC6591121          DOI: 10.2337/dc17-1827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  37 in total

1.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?

Authors:  Simon G Thompson; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Use and abuse of HOMA modeling.

Authors:  Tara M Wallace; Jonathan C Levy; David R Matthews
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Lower baseline glycemia reduces apparent oral agent glucose-lowering efficacy: a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Zachary T Bloomgarden; Regina Dodis; Catherine M Viscoli; Eric S Holmboe; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  The effect of obesity on glycaemic response to metformin or sulphonylureas in Type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  L A Donnelly; A S F Doney; A T Hattersley; A D Morris; E R Pearson
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.359

6.  Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head.

Authors:  Jesse A Berlin; Jill Santanna; Christopher H Schmid; Lynda A Szczech; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Urine C-peptide creatinine ratio is an alternative to stimulated serum C-peptide measurement in late-onset, insulin-treated diabetes.

Authors:  A G Jones; R E J Besser; T J McDonald; B M Shields; S V Hope; P Bowman; R A Oram; B A Knight; A T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Predictors of response to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: evidence from randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Matteo Monami; Francesco Cremasco; Caterina Lamanna; Niccolò Marchionni; Edoardo Mannucci
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.876

9.  Use of metabolic markers to identify overweight individuals who are insulin resistant.

Authors:  Tracey McLaughlin; Fahim Abbasi; Karen Cheal; James Chu; Cindy Lamendola; Gerald Reaven
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Urine C-peptide creatinine ratio is a noninvasive alternative to the mixed-meal tolerance test in children and adults with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Rachel E J Besser; Johnny Ludvigsson; Angus G Jones; Timothy J McDonald; Beverley M Shields; Bridget A Knight; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  26 in total

1.  Diabetes: Clinical markers of glycaemic response to DPP4 inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Ivone Leong
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Heterogeneity of Diabetes: β-Cells, Phenotypes, and Precision Medicine: Proceedings of an International Symposium of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research's Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes and the U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Authors:  William T Cefalu; Dana K Andersen; Guillermo Arreaza-Rubín; Christopher L Pin; Sheryl Sato; C Bruce Verchere; Minna Woo; Norman D Rosenblum
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 17.152

3.  Precision medicine in diabetes: a Consensus Report from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Wendy K Chung; Karel Erion; Jose C Florez; Andrew T Hattersley; Marie-France Hivert; Christine G Lee; Mark I McCarthy; John J Nolan; Jill M Norris; Ewan R Pearson; Louis Philipson; Allison T McElvaine; William T Cefalu; Stephen S Rich; Paul W Franks
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Glucose-lowering action through targeting islet dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: Focus on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition.

Authors:  Bo Ahrén
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.232

5.  Evaluating associations between the benefits and risks of drug therapy in type 2 diabetes: a joint modeling approach.

Authors:  John M Dennis; Beverley M Shields; Angus G Jones; Ewan R Pearson; Andrew T Hattersley; William E Henley
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  Disease progression and treatment response in data-driven subgroups of type 2 diabetes compared with models based on simple clinical features: an analysis using clinical trial data.

Authors:  John M Dennis; Beverley M Shields; William E Henley; Angus G Jones; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 44.867

7.  Clinical phenotyping of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in Yemen.

Authors:  Abdallah Ahmed Gunaid; Mohammed Mohammed Al-Kebsi; Mahfouth Abdalla Bamashmus; Saleh Ahmed Al-Akily; Ahmed Nasser Al-Radaei
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2018-12-07

8.  Sex and BMI Alter the Benefits and Risks of Sulfonylureas and Thiazolidinediones in Type 2 Diabetes: A Framework for Evaluating Stratification Using Routine Clinical and Individual Trial Data.

Authors:  John M Dennis; William E Henley; Michael N Weedon; Mike Lonergan; Lauren R Rodgers; Angus G Jones; William T Hamilton; Naveed Sattar; Salim Janmohamed; Rury R Holman; Ewan R Pearson; Beverley M Shields; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Randomised cross-over trial of vildagliptin and pioglitazone as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: predicting Which One is Right Here (WORTH) study protocol.

Authors:  Rui Qian Yeu; Rebecca Brandon; Yannan Jiang; Dale Griffiths; Kate Smallman; Allan Moffitt; Glenn Doherty; Ryan Paul; Jennie Harré Hindmarsh; Tony R Merriman; Kerry Macaskill-Smith; Brandon Orr-Walker; Rinki Murphy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Precision diabetes: Where do we stand today?

Authors:  Viswanathan Mohan; Ranjit Unnikrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.